Gadegbeku Crystal A, Stillman Phyllis Kreger, Huffman Mark D, Jackson James S, Kusek John W, Jamerson Kenneth A
University of Michigan Health System, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0725, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Nov;29(6):837-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
Recruitment of diverse populations into clinical trials remains challenging but is needed to fully understand disease processes and benefit the general public. Greater knowledge of key factors among ethnic and racial minority populations associated with the decision to participate in clinical research studies may facilitate recruitment and enhance the generalizibility of study results. Therefore, during the recruitment phase of the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) trial, we conducted a telephone survey, using validated questions, to explore potential facilitators and barriers of research participation among eligible candidates residing in seven U.S. locations. Survey responses included a range of characteristics and perceptions among participants and non-participants and were compared using bivariate and step-wise logistic regression analyses. One-hundred forty-one respondents in the one-hundred forty (70 trial participants and 71 non-participants) completed the survey. Trial participants and non-participants were similar in multiple demographic characteristics and shared similar views on discrimination, physician mistrust, and research integrity. Key group differences were related to their perceptions of the impact of their research participation. Participants associated enrollment with personal and societal health benefits, while non-participants were influenced by the health risks. In a step-wise linear regression analysis, the most powerful significant positive predictors of participation were acknowledgement of health status as important in the enrollment decision (OR=4.54, p=0.006), employment (OR=3.12, p = 0.05) and healthcare satisfaction (OR=2.12, p<0.01). Racially-based mistrust did not emerge as a negative predictor and subjects' decisions were not influenced by the race of the research staff. In conclusion, these results suggest that health-related factors, and not psychosocial perceptions, have predominant influence on research participation among African Americans.
将不同人群纳入临床试验仍然具有挑战性,但这对于全面了解疾病进程和造福公众是必要的。深入了解少数族裔人群中与参与临床研究决策相关的关键因素,可能有助于招募工作,并提高研究结果的普遍性。因此,在非裔美国人肾脏疾病与高血压研究(AASK)试验的招募阶段,我们使用经过验证的问题进行了一项电话调查,以探索居住在美国七个地点的符合条件的候选人参与研究的潜在促进因素和障碍。调查回复包括参与者和非参与者的一系列特征和看法,并使用双变量和逐步逻辑回归分析进行比较。一百四十名受访者中的一百四十一人(70名试验参与者和71名非参与者)完成了调查。试验参与者和非参与者在多个人口统计学特征方面相似,并且在歧视、对医生的不信任和研究诚信方面有相似的看法。关键的群体差异与他们对参与研究的影响的看法有关。参与者将参与试验与个人和社会健康益处联系起来,而非参与者则受到健康风险的影响。在逐步线性回归分析中,参与的最有力的显著正向预测因素是承认健康状况在参与决策中很重要(OR = 4.54,p = 0.006)、就业(OR = 3.12,p = 0.05)和医疗保健满意度(OR = 2.12,p < 0.01)。基于种族的不信任并未成为负面预测因素,受试者的决策也不受研究人员种族的影响。总之,这些结果表明,与健康相关的因素而非社会心理认知,对非裔美国人参与研究具有主要影响。