The University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2007, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
Shared decision-making (SDM) is an important component of patient-centered healthcare and is positively associated with improved health outcomes (e.g. diabetes and hypertension control). In shared decision-making, patients and physicians engage in bidirectional dialogue about patients' symptoms and treatment options, and select treatment plans that address patient preferences. Existing research shows that African-Americans experience SDM less often than whites, a fact which may contribute to racial disparities in diabetes outcomes. Yet little is known about the reasons for racial disparities in shared decision-making. We explored patient perceptions of how race may influence SDM between African-American patients and their physicians. We conducted in-depth interviews (n=24) and five focus groups (n=27) among a purposeful sample of African-American diabetes patients aged over 21 years, at an urban academic medical center in Chicago. Each interview/focus group was audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and imported into Atlas.ti software. Coding was conducted iteratively; each transcription was independently coded by two research team members. Although there was heterogeneity in patients' perceptions about the influence of race on SDM, in each of the SDM domains (information-sharing, deliberation/physician recommendations, and decision-making), participants identified a range of race-related issues that may influence SDM. Participants identified physician bias/discrimination and/or cultural discordance as issues that may influence physician-related SDM behaviors (e.g. less likely to share information such as test results and more likely to be domineering with African-American patients). They identified mistrust of white physicians, negative attitudes and internalized racism as patient-related issues that may influence African-American patients' SDM behaviors (e.g. less forthcoming with physicians about health information, more deference to physicians, less likely to adhere to treatment regimens). This study suggests that race-related patient and physician-related barriers may serve as significant barriers to shared decision-making between African-American patients and their physicians. Finding innovative ways to address such communication barriers is an important area of future research.
共同决策(SDM)是以患者为中心的医疗保健的重要组成部分,与改善健康结果(例如糖尿病和高血压控制)呈正相关。在共同决策中,患者和医生就患者的症状和治疗方案进行双向对话,并选择解决患者偏好的治疗方案。现有研究表明,非裔美国人进行共同决策的频率低于白人,这一事实可能导致糖尿病结果的种族差异。然而,对于共同决策中种族差异的原因知之甚少。我们探讨了患者对种族可能如何影响非裔美国患者及其医生之间共同决策的看法。我们在芝加哥一家城市学术医疗中心,对 21 岁以上的有目的的非裔美国糖尿病患者进行了深入访谈(n=24)和五次焦点小组(n=27)。每次访谈/焦点小组都进行了录音,逐字转录,并导入 Atlas.ti 软件。编码是迭代进行的;两名研究小组成员独立对每份转录进行编码。尽管患者对种族对 SDM 影响的看法存在差异,但在 SDM 的各个领域(信息共享、审议/医生建议和决策)中,参与者都确定了一系列可能影响 SDM 的与种族相关的问题。参与者确定医生的偏见/歧视和/或文化差异可能影响与医生相关的 SDM 行为(例如,不太可能像医生分享测试结果等信息,更有可能对非裔美国患者专横)。他们确定了对白人医生的不信任、对医生的消极态度和内化的种族主义是可能影响非裔美国患者 SDM 行为的患者相关问题(例如,对医生隐瞒健康信息,更尊重医生,不太可能遵守治疗方案)。这项研究表明,与种族相关的患者和医生相关的障碍可能是非裔美国患者与其医生之间共同决策的重大障碍。寻找解决此类沟通障碍的创新方法是未来研究的一个重要领域。