Bonnard Arnaud, Demarche Monique, Dimitriu Carla, Podevin Guillaume, Varlet Francois, François Michel, Valioulis Ioannis, Allal Hossein
Department of Pediatric Surgery and EA3102, Robert Debré Hospital, APHP and Paris VII University, 75019 Paris, France.
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jul;43(7):1249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.11.022.
Surgical management of intussusception is required for cases where enema reduction fails. Some articles report an advantage of the laparoscopic over the open approach, but complications such as serosal tearing and frank perforation have been described. We aim to determine the best indication of laparoscopy in the decisional management tree of intussusception.
This is a retrospective chart review of all children with intussusception who failed hydrostatic enema reduction and who underwent immediate laparoscopic management. Cases were compiled from 7 pediatric surgical centers (French Study Group of Pediatric Laparoscopy) between 1992 and 2005. Data collected included age, duration of symptoms, findings on initial assessment, level of intussusceptum after attempted hydrostatic enema reduction, type of laparoscopic approach, operative time, conversion to open surgery, etiology, and postoperative complications. Two groups were analyzed-conversion to open surgery or not.
Sixty-nine patients (48 males and 21 females) were reviewed. In total, 22 patients required a conversion to open surgery (31.9%). Eleven of these were converted because of failure of laparoscopic reduction. The risk for conversion to open surgery is directly linked to the length of time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis (1.6 vs 3.1 days for conversion group, P = .048), the presence of signs of peritonitis on the initial clinical assessment (10.6% vs 41% in conversion group, P = .003), and the presence or absence of a pathologic lead point (17% vs 50% in conversion group, P = .004).
The child seen early after the onset of symptoms (<1.5 days) with no signs of peritonitis is the best candidate for a laparoscopic approach in management of intussusception requiring surgery. Particular attention must be paid to not miss a pathologic lead point, especially as most tactile cues are lost.
对于灌肠复位失败的肠套叠病例,需要进行手术治疗。一些文章报道了腹腔镜手术相对于开放手术的优势,但也描述了诸如浆膜撕裂和明显穿孔等并发症。我们旨在确定腹腔镜检查在肠套叠决策管理流程中的最佳适应证。
这是一项对所有因水压灌肠复位失败而立即接受腹腔镜手术治疗的肠套叠患儿进行的回顾性病历审查。病例收集自1992年至2005年期间的7个儿科外科中心(法国儿科腹腔镜研究组)。收集的数据包括年龄、症状持续时间、初始评估结果、尝试水压灌肠复位后肠套叠的部位、腹腔镜手术方式、手术时间、转为开放手术情况、病因及术后并发症。分析了两组——是否转为开放手术。
共审查了69例患者(48例男性和21例女性)。总共有22例患者需要转为开放手术(31.9%)。其中11例因腹腔镜复位失败而转为开放手术。转为开放手术的风险与症状出现至诊断的时间长短直接相关(转为开放手术组为1.6天,未转为开放手术组为3.1天,P = 0.048),初始临床评估时是否存在腹膜炎体征(转为开放手术组为10.6%,未转为开放手术组为41%,P = 0.003),以及是否存在病理性引导点(转为开放手术组为17%,未转为开放手术组为50%,P = 0.004)。
症状出现后早期(<1.5天)且无腹膜炎体征的患儿是需要手术治疗的肠套叠腹腔镜手术的最佳候选者。必须特别注意不要遗漏病理性引导点,尤其是因为大多数触觉线索已经消失。