Tobia Colleen Cook, Aspinall Sherrie L, Good Chester B, Fine Michael J, Hanlon Joseph T
Department of Pharmacy, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15240-1000, USA.
Clin Ther. 2008 Jun;30(6):1135-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.06.009.
Studies that have assessed antibiotic appropriateness in acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) with a likely bacterial etiology have focused only on antibiotic choice and ignored other important aspects of prescribing, such as dosing, drug-drug interactions, and duration of treatment.
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing practices in outpatients with acute bacterial RTIs (community-acquired pneumonia [CAP], sinusitis, or acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis [AECB]).
This retrospective, cross-sectional study enrolled outpatients with CAP, sinusitis, or AECB who were evaluated in a Veterans Affairs emergency department over a 1-year period. Using electronic medical records, trained research assistants completed data-collection forms that included patient characteristics (eg, marital status, history of alcohol abuse), diagnosis, comorbidities, concurrent medications, and antibiotics prescribed. To assess antimicrobial appropriateness, a trained clinical pharmacist reviewed the data-collection forms and applied a Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), which rated the appropriateness of a medication using 10 criteria: indication, effectiveness, dosage, directions, practicality (defined as capability of being used or being put into practice), drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, unnecessary duplication, duration, and expensiveness (defined as the cost of the drug compared with other agents of similar efficacy and tolerability). Previous studies have found good inter- and intrarater reliabilities between a clinical pharmacist's and an internal medicine physician's MAI ratings (kappa=0.83 and 0.92, respectively).
One hundred fifty-three patients were included (mean age, 58 years; 92% male; and 65% white). Overall, 99 of 153 patients (65%) had inappropriate antibiotic prescribing as assessed using the MAI. Expensiveness (60 patients [39%]), impracticality (32 [21%]), and incorrect dosage (15 [10%]) were the most frequently rated problem. Penicillins, quinolones, and macrolides were the most common antibiotic classes prescribed inappropriately. A history of alcohol abuse was associated with a lower likelihood of inappropriate prescribing compared with no history of alcohol abuse (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.10-0.98), while patients who were married were more likely to receive inappropriately prescribed antibiotics than those who were not married (AOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.25-5.59).
Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing based on the MAI criteria was common (65%) in this selected patient population with acute bacterial RTIs, and often involved problems with expensiveness (39%), impracticality (21%), and incorrect dosage (10%). Future interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing should consider aspects beyond choice of agent.
评估可能由细菌引起的急性呼吸道感染(RTIs)中抗生素使用合理性的研究仅关注抗生素的选择,而忽略了处方的其他重要方面,如剂量、药物相互作用和治疗持续时间。
本研究旨在确定急性细菌性RTIs(社区获得性肺炎[CAP]、鼻窦炎或慢性支气管炎急性加重[AECB])门诊患者中不适当抗生素处方行为的发生率及预测因素。
这项回顾性横断面研究纳入了在退伍军人事务部急诊科接受评估的1年内患有CAP、鼻窦炎或AECB的门诊患者。使用电子病历,经过培训的研究助理完成数据收集表格,其中包括患者特征(如婚姻状况、酗酒史)、诊断、合并症、同时使用的药物以及所开具的抗生素。为评估抗菌药物的合理性,一名经过培训的临床药师审查数据收集表格并应用药物合理性指数(MAI),该指数使用10条标准对药物的合理性进行评分:适应证、有效性、剂量、用法、实用性(定义为可使用或可付诸实践的能力)、药物相互作用、药物与疾病相互作用、不必要的重复用药、疗程和昂贵性(定义为与具有相似疗效和耐受性的其他药物相比该药物的成本)。先前的研究发现临床药师和内科医生的MAI评分之间具有良好的评分者间和评分者内信度(kappa值分别为0.83和0.92)。
共纳入153例患者(平均年龄58岁;92%为男性;65%为白人)。总体而言,根据MAI评估,153例患者中有99例(65%)存在不适当的抗生素处方。昂贵性(60例患者[39%])、不实用性(32例[21%])和剂量错误(15例[10%])是最常被评定的问题。青霉素类、喹诺酮类和大环内酯类是最常被不适当处方的抗生素类别。与无酗酒史相比,酗酒史与不适当处方的可能性较低相关(调整后的优势比[AOR],0.32;95%置信区间[CI],0.10 - 0.98),而已婚患者比未婚患者更有可能接受不适当处方的抗生素(AOR,2.64;95%CI,1.25 - 5.59)。
在这个选定的急性细菌性RTIs患者群体中,基于MAI标准的不适当抗生素处方很常见(65%),并且经常涉及昂贵性(39%)、不实用性(21%)和剂量错误(10%)等问题。未来改善抗生素处方的干预措施应考虑除药物选择之外的其他方面。