Suppr超能文献

珊瑚的白化易感性和死亡率由共生体类型的细微差异决定。

Bleaching susceptibility and mortality of corals are determined by fine-scale differences in symbiont type.

作者信息

Sampayo E M, Ridgway T, Bongaerts P, Hoegh-Guldberg O

机构信息

Centre for Marine Studies, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia QLD 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 29;105(30):10444-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708049105. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

Abstract

Coral bleaching has been identified as one of the major contributors to coral reef decline, and the occurrence of different symbionts determined by broad genetic groupings (clades A-H) is commonly used to explain thermal responses of reef-building corals. By using Stylophora pistillata as a model, we monitored individual tagged colonies in situ over a two-year period and show that fine level genetic variability within clade C is correlated to differences in bleaching susceptibility. Based on denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of the internal transcribed spacer region 2, visual bleaching assessments, symbiont densities, host protein, and pulse amplitude modulated fluorometry, we show that subcladal types C78 and C8/a are more thermally tolerant than C79 and C35/a, which suffered significant bleaching and postbleaching mortality. Although additional symbiont types were detected during bleaching in colonies harboring types C79 and C35/a, all colonies reverted back to their original symbionts postbleaching. Most importantly, the data propose that the differential mortality of hosts harboring thermally sensitive versus resistant symbionts rather than symbiont shuffling/switching within a single host is responsible for the observed symbiont composition changes of coral communities after bleaching. This study therefore highlights that the use of broad cladal designations may not be suitable to describe differences in bleaching susceptibility, and that differential mortality results in a loss of both symbiont and host genetic diversity and therefore represents an important mechanism in explaining how coral reef communities may respond to changing conditions.

摘要

珊瑚白化已被确认为珊瑚礁衰退的主要原因之一,根据宽泛的基因分类(A - H类群)确定的不同共生体的出现情况,常被用于解释造礁珊瑚的热响应。以鹿角杯形珊瑚为模型,我们在两年时间里对单个标记的珊瑚群体进行了原位监测,结果表明C类群内精细水平的遗传变异性与白化易感性差异相关。基于对转录间隔区2的变性梯度凝胶电泳、目视白化评估、共生体密度、宿主蛋白以及脉冲幅度调制荧光测定,我们发现亚类群类型C78和C8/a比C79和C35/a更耐热,后两者遭受了显著的白化和白化后死亡。尽管在含有C79和C35/a类型的群体白化过程中检测到了其他共生体类型,但所有群体在白化后都恢复到了原来的共生体。最重要的是,数据表明,携带热敏性与抗性共生体的宿主的差异死亡率,而非单个宿主内的共生体洗牌/转换,是导致白化后珊瑚群落共生体组成变化的原因。因此,本研究强调,使用宽泛的类群划分可能不适用于描述白化易感性差异,差异死亡率导致共生体和宿主遗传多样性的丧失,因此是解释珊瑚礁群落如何应对变化条件的一个重要机制。

相似文献

9
Protein evolution in two co-occurring types of Symbiodinium: an exploration into the genetic basis of thermal tolerance in Symbiodinium clade D.两种共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生共生 ## 技术与健康伦理 ## 1. 引言 随着科技的快速发展,我们正步入一个技术与健康相互交融的新时代。技术在为我们带来便利和进步的同时,也引发了一系列关于健康和伦理的挑战。本文旨在探讨技术与健康伦理之间的关系,旨在探讨如何在技术的发展中确保健康和伦理的平衡。 ## 2. 技术的进步对健康的影响 - **医疗保健的进步**:医疗技术的发展使人们能够更好地预防、诊断和治疗疾病,提高了全球健康水平。例如,基因编辑、基因治疗和基因测序等技术为治疗遗传疾病提供了新的希望。 - **远程医疗**:远程医疗的发展使患者能够获得远程医疗服务,提高了医疗的可及性和效率。这有助于改善医疗资源的分配,特别是在偏远和资源匮乏的地区。 - **电子健康记录**:电子健康记录的发展使医疗记录的管理更加便捷和高效,提高了医疗质量和安全性。 ## 3. 技术的发展引发的伦理问题 - **隐私和数据安全**:随着互联网和大数据技术的发展,个人数据的收集、存储和共享引发了隐私和数据安全的问题。这可能导致个人隐私的侵犯和数据滥用的风险。 - **技术的不平等**:技术的发展可能加剧社会的不平等,例如数字鸿沟和数字排斥。这可能导致一些人无法获得技术带来的益处,加剧社会的不平等。 - **技术的滥用**:技术的滥用可能对健康产生负面影响,例如过度使用抗生素导致的抗生素耐药性的出现。这可能威胁到公共卫生。 ## 4. 技术与健康伦理的平衡 - **监管和法律框架**:制定和实施相关的政策和法规,以确保技术的发展符合伦理标准。这包括制定和更新伦理准则、伦理审查程序和法规,以确保技术的发展符合伦理原则。 - **公众教育**:提高公众对技术与健康伦理问题的认识和理解,增强公众的技术素养和伦理意识。这有助于公众能够做出明智的决策,参与技术的发展和应用,并能够识别和应对技术带来的伦理挑战。 - **伦理准则和指南**:制定和发布伦理准则和指南,为技术的发展提供指导。这些准则和指南应考虑到不同技术的特点和潜在影响,为技术的开发和应用提供指导。 - **利益相关者的参与**:鼓励利益相关者的参与,包括患者、医生、技术开发者、政策制定者和公众,以确保技术的发展和应用符合伦理原则。这有助于确保各方的利益得到考虑,促进技术与健康的平衡。 ## 5. 结论 技术与健康伦理的平衡是一个复杂而重要的议题,需要综合考虑技术的潜在益处、伦理原则和公众利益。通过制定和实施相关政策、加强公众教育、制定伦理准则和指南以及鼓励利益相关者的参与,可以促进技术与健康的平衡,确保技术的发展符合伦理标准,为人类的健康和福祉服务。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Nov 12;12:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-217.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验