Bermúdez Valmore, Cano Raquel, Cano Clímaco, Bermúdez Fernando, Leal Elliuz, Acosta Karen, Mengual Edgardo, Arraiz Nailet, Briceño Carlos, Gómez Juan, Bustamante Magaly, Aparicio Daniel, Cabrera Mayela, Valdelamar Lysney, Rodriguez Moisés, Manuel Velasco, Hernández Rafael
Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, University of Zulia School of Medicine, Maracaibo, Venezuela.
Am J Ther. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):409-16. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318160b909.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that results from defects in both insulin secretion and insulin action. Questions remain about when insulin therapy is indicated; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate homeostasis model assessment beta-cell (HOMAbetacell) values as surrogate criteria for insulin therapy indication in patients with type 2 diabetes. A prospective study was performed involving 189 type 2 diabetic patients with deficient metabolic control assessed by clinical and laboratory parameters. All patients received nutritional intervention and combination therapy with metformin and glimepiride. Patients who did not respond were admitted to the next phase, which consisted of glimepiride + metformin + rosiglitazone oral therapy and revaluation after 3 months. Comparisons between responders and nonresponders in this phase were made in order to achieve differences in metabolic parameters and beta cell function. Of 189 patients studied, 150 (79.36%) were considered full responders in the first phase of this study. The remaining 39 patients were admitted in the second trial phase, in which 20 patients (51.28%) responded to triple oral therapy, while the other 19 (49.72%) required insulin therapy. Significant differences were found in fasting and postprandial glycemia (P < 0.001; P < 0.004) between the non-insulin-requiring group (200 +/- 12.0 mg/dL; 266.05 +/- 17,67 mg/dL) and the insulin-requiring group (291.5 +/- 17.6 mg/dL; 361.6 +/- 26.1 mg/dL). Likewise, significant differences were observed in homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMAIR) and HOMAbetacell values (P < 0.002; P < 0.04) between non-insulin-requiring patients (7.7 +/- 0.8; 24.5 +/- 1.3%) and insulin-requiring patients (12.6 +/- 1.2; 19.4 +/- 2.4%). Finally, significant differences were observed when comparing body mass index (non-insulin-requiring group, 29.2 +/- 0.4 kg/m, versus insulin-requiring group, 27.1 +/- 0.9 kg/m; P < 0.05). HOMAbetacell determination in clinical practice is a useful tool to determine when insulin therapy should be started for type 2 diabetic patients.
2型糖尿病是一种由胰岛素分泌缺陷和胰岛素作用缺陷导致的代谢紊乱疾病。关于何时开始胰岛素治疗仍存在疑问;因此,本研究的目的是评估稳态模型评估β细胞(HOMAbetacell)值,作为2型糖尿病患者胰岛素治疗指征的替代标准。进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入了189例2型糖尿病患者,这些患者的代谢控制不佳,通过临床和实验室参数进行评估。所有患者均接受营养干预以及二甲双胍和格列美脲联合治疗。无反应的患者进入下一阶段,该阶段包括格列美脲+二甲双胍+罗格列酮口服治疗,并在3个月后重新评估。对该阶段有反应者和无反应者进行比较,以找出代谢参数和β细胞功能的差异。在研究的189例患者中,150例(79.36%)在本研究的第一阶段被认为是完全反应者。其余39例患者进入第二试验阶段,其中20例患者(51.28%)对三联口服治疗有反应,而另外19例(49.72%)需要胰岛素治疗。在非胰岛素治疗组(空腹血糖200±12.0mg/dL;餐后血糖266.05±17.67mg/dL)和胰岛素治疗组(空腹血糖291.5±17.6mg/dL;餐后血糖361.6±26.1mg/dL)之间,空腹和餐后血糖水平存在显著差异(P<0.001;P<0.004)。同样,在非胰岛素治疗患者(稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗(HOMAIR)为7.7±0.8;HOMAbetacell值为24.5±1.3%)和胰岛素治疗患者(HOMAIR为12.6±1.2;HOMAbetacell值为19.4±2.4%)之间,HOMAIR和HOMAbetacell值也存在显著差异(P<0.002;P<0.04)。最后,比较体重指数时观察到显著差异(非胰岛素治疗组为29.2±0.4kg/m²,胰岛素治疗组为27.1±0.9kg/m²;P<0.05)。在临床实践中,测定HOMAbetacell是确定2型糖尿病患者何时应开始胰岛素治疗的有用工具。