• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用移植前供体和受体特征进行肝移植成本预测。

Cost prediction in liver transplantation using pretransplant donor and recipient characteristics.

作者信息

Earl T Markley, Cooil Bruce, Rubin Josh E, Chari Ravi S

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-4753, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2008 Jul 27;86(2):238-44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181778d54.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181778d54
PMID:18645485
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is a costly procedure and its cost is likely driven by both donor and recipient factors. Recently, the recipient model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score has been correlated with increased posttransplant cost; however, other factors have not been identified. We sought to identify if other donor and recipient factors are associated with increased cost.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-six liver transplants performed at our center from January 2004 through February 2006 were included in the estimation sample, and the subsequent 75 transplants were used as a validation cohort. To determine whether donor factors influenced cost, two latent class linear regression models were created from the estimation sample: one considering only recipient variables (model A) and a second incorporating both donor and recipient factors (model B). The resultant models were then validated in the second group of patients and compared with the best single-segment linear regression models.

RESULTS

Model A predictors include pretransplant intensive care unit (ICU) stay, age x body mass index, and calculated MELD. In model B, significant predictors are calculated MELD, age, age x pretransplant ICU stay, and donor age more than 40 as significant variables. In validation, only model A remained predictive of cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Although marginal donor factors are recognized to influence clinical outcome, they did not factor significantly in cost modeling. In addition to MELD, the recipient factors of pretransplant ICU stay, age, and body mass index are pretransplant variables correlated mostly with posttransplant cost across broad populations.

摘要

背景

肝移植是一项成本高昂的手术,其费用可能由供体和受体因素共同驱动。最近,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与移植后成本增加相关;然而,其他因素尚未明确。我们试图确定其他供体和受体因素是否与成本增加有关。

方法

将2004年1月至2006年2月在我们中心进行的166例肝移植纳入估计样本,随后的75例移植用作验证队列。为了确定供体因素是否影响成本,从估计样本中创建了两个潜在类别线性回归模型:一个仅考虑受体变量(模型A),另一个纳入供体和受体因素(模型B)。然后在第二组患者中对所得模型进行验证,并与最佳单段线性回归模型进行比较。

结果

模型A的预测因素包括移植前重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、年龄×体重指数和计算得出的MELD。在模型B中,显著的预测因素是计算得出的MELD、年龄、年龄×移植前ICU住院时间以及供体年龄大于40岁作为显著变量。在验证中,只有模型A仍然能够预测成本。

结论

虽然边缘供体因素被认为会影响临床结果,但它们在成本建模中并未起到显著作用。除了MELD之外,移植前ICU住院时间、年龄和体重指数等受体因素是广泛人群中与移植后成本最相关的移植前变量。

相似文献

1
Cost prediction in liver transplantation using pretransplant donor and recipient characteristics.利用移植前供体和受体特征进行肝移植成本预测。
Transplantation. 2008 Jul 27;86(2):238-44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181778d54.
2
Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission.终末期肝病时代模型中的肝移植成本:超越移植入院的考量
Liver Transpl. 2009 Oct;15(10):1270-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.21802.
3
Comprehensive cost comparison of adult-adult right hepatic lobe living-donor liver transplantation with cadaveric transplantation.成人对成人右肝叶活体肝移植与尸体肝移植的综合成本比较。
Transplantation. 2003 Feb 27;75(4):473-6. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000047310.04069.ED.
4
Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.预测肝移植后的结局:终末期肝病模型及新推导的判别函数的效用。
Transplantation. 2004 Jan 15;77(1):99-106. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101009.91516.FC.
5
Factors influencing liver transplant length of stay at two large-volume transplant centers.影响两家大型移植中心肝移植患者住院时间的因素。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Nov;15(11):1570-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.21858.
6
Development and validation of a model predicting graft survival after liver transplantation.肝移植后移植物存活预测模型的开发与验证
Liver Transpl. 2006 Nov;12(11):1594-606. doi: 10.1002/lt.20764.
7
[Influence of recipient pretransplant MELD-AS score and graft size on the outcome of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation].[受体移植前MELD-AS评分及移植物大小对成人对成人活体肝移植结局的影响]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2008 Sep;39(5):801-4.
8
Analysis of liver transplant outcomes for United Network for Organ Sharing recipients 60 years old or older identifies multiple model for end-stage liver disease-independent prognostic factors.分析美国器官共享网络 60 岁及以上受者的肝移植结局,确定了多个与终末期肝病模型无关的预后因素。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Aug;16(8):950-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22098.
9
Prognostic value of MELD score and donor quality in liver transplantation: implications for the donor recipient match.
Transplant Proc. 2006 May;38(4):1059-62. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.03.008.
10
Utilization of extended donor criteria liver allograft: Is the elevated risk of failure independent of the model for end-stage liver disease score of the recipient?扩大标准供体肝移植的应用:移植失败风险升高是否独立于受者的终末期肝病模型评分?
Transplantation. 2006 Dec 27;82(12):1653-7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000250571.41361.21.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients Benefit from Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond Milan Criteria without Harming the Health Care System.肝细胞癌患者接受超出米兰标准的肝移植治疗可从中获益,且不会损害医疗保健系统。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;14(5):1136. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051136.
2
Predictors of micro-costing components in liver transplantation.肝移植中微观成本核算组成部分的预测因素。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Jun;72(6):333-342. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(06)02.
3
High MELD score and extended operating time predict prolonged initial ICU stay after liver transplantation and influence the outcome.
高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分和延长的手术时间预示着肝移植术后最初入住重症监护病房(ICU)的时间延长,并影响预后。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0174173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174173. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparable outcome of liver transplantation with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate vs. University of Wisconsin preservation solution: a retrospective observational double-center trial.组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸与威斯康星大学保存液用于肝移植的疗效比较:一项回顾性观察性双中心试验
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 28;14:169. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-169.