• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期肝病时代模型中的肝移植成本:超越移植入院的考量

Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission.

作者信息

Buchanan Paula, Dzebisashvili Nino, Lentine Krista L, Axelrod David A, Schnitzler Mark A, Salvalaggio Paolo R

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2009 Oct;15(10):1270-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.21802.

DOI:10.1002/lt.21802
PMID:19790155
Abstract

We examined the relationship between the total cost incurred by liver transplantation (LT) recipients and their Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the time of transplant. We used a novel database linking billing claims from a large private payer with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry. Included were adults who underwent LT from March 2002 through August 2007 (n = 990). Claims within the year preceding and following transplantation were analyzed according to the recipient's calculated MELD score. Cost was the primary endpoint and was assessed by the length of stay and charges. Transplant admission charges represented approximately 50% of the total cost of LT. MELD was a significant cost driver for pretransplant, transplant, and total charges. A MELD score of 28 to 40 was associated with additional charges of $349,213 (P < 0.05) in comparison with a score of 15 to 20. Pretransplant and transplant admission charges were higher by $152,819 (P < 0.05) and $64,286 (P < 0.05), respectively, in this higher MELD group. No differences by MELD score were found for posttransplant charges. Those in the highest MELD group also experienced longer hospital stays both in the pretransplant period and at the time of LT but did not have higher rates of re-admissions. In conclusion, high-MELD patients incur significantly higher costs prior to and at the time of LT. Following LT, the MELD score is not a significant predictor of cost or re-admission.

摘要

我们研究了肝移植(LT)受者产生的总费用与其移植时的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分之间的关系。我们使用了一个新颖的数据库,该数据库将来自大型私人支付方的计费索赔与器官获取和移植网络登记处相链接。纳入的患者为2002年3月至2007年8月期间接受肝移植的成年人(n = 990)。根据受者计算出的MELD评分,分析移植前后一年内的索赔情况。费用是主要终点,通过住院时间和收费来评估。移植入院费用约占肝移植总费用的50%。MELD是移植前、移植及总费用的一个重要费用驱动因素。与15至20分的评分相比,28至40分的MELD评分与额外费用349,213美元相关(P < 0.05)。在这个较高MELD组中,移植前和移植入院费用分别高出152,819美元(P < 0.05)和64,286美元(P < 0.05)。未发现移植后费用在MELD评分上存在差异。MELD评分最高组的患者在移植前和肝移植时的住院时间也更长,但再入院率并不更高。总之,高MELD评分患者在肝移植前和肝移植时产生的费用显著更高。肝移植后,MELD评分不是费用或再入院的显著预测指标。

相似文献

1
Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission.终末期肝病时代模型中的肝移植成本:超越移植入院的考量
Liver Transpl. 2009 Oct;15(10):1270-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.21802.
2
Cost prediction in liver transplantation using pretransplant donor and recipient characteristics.利用移植前供体和受体特征进行肝移植成本预测。
Transplantation. 2008 Jul 27;86(2):238-44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181778d54.
3
Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function.预测肝移植后的结局:终末期肝病模型及新推导的判别函数的效用。
Transplantation. 2004 Jan 15;77(1):99-106. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101009.91516.FC.
4
The utility of the model for end-stage liver disease score: a reliable guide for liver transplant candidacy and, for select patients, simultaneous hospice referral.终末期肝病模型评分的效用:肝移植候选资格的可靠指南,以及为特定患者同时进行临终关怀转诊的依据。
Liver Transpl. 2008 Aug;14(8):1100-6. doi: 10.1002/lt.21398.
5
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients.终末期肝病模型评分不能预测活体肝移植受者的患者或移植物存活率。
Liver Transpl. 2003 Jul;9(7):737-40. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50122.
6
Impact of the MELD score on waiting time and disease severity in liver transplantation in United States veterans.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对美国退伍军人肝移植等待时间和疾病严重程度的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2007 Nov;13(11):1564-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.21262.
7
Hospitalization patterns before and after liver transplantation.肝移植前后的住院模式。
Transplantation. 2007 Dec 27;84(12):1590-4. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000295733.69375.2f.
8
Split-liver transplantation in the high-MELD adult patient: are we being too cautious?高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分成年患者的劈离式肝移植:我们是否过于谨慎?
Transpl Int. 2009 Jul;22(7):702-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.00850.x. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
9
Impact of pretransplant MELD score on posttransplant outcome in living donor liver transplantation.移植前终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对活体肝移植术后结局的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2004 Jun;36(5):1442-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.05.004.
10
MELD score versus conventional UNOS status in predicting short-term mortality after liver transplantation.肝移植后预测短期死亡率的MELD评分与传统的器官共享联合网络(UNOS)状态对比
Transpl Int. 2005 Jan;18(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.00024.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing landscape of liver transplant in the United States-.美国肝脏移植领域不断变化的局面-
Front Transplant. 2024 Aug 8;3:1449407. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1449407. eCollection 2024.
2
A decade of liver transplantation in Mongolia: Economic insights and cost analysis.蒙古国十年肝移植:经济洞察与成本分析
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00528-0.
3
Intensive care unit readmission in adult Egyptian patients undergoing living donor liver transplant: A single-centre retrospective cohort study.
成年埃及活体供肝移植患者重症监护病房再入院情况:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
World J Hepatol. 2022 Jun 27;14(6):1150-1161. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i6.1150.
4
Burden of early hospitalization after simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: Results from the US Multicenter SLKT Consortium.肝-肾联合移植后早期住院负担:来自美国多中心 SLKT 联盟的结果。
Liver Transpl. 2022 Nov;28(11):1756-1765. doi: 10.1002/lt.26523. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
5
Costs and Outcomes of Privately-Insured Kidney Transplant Recipients by Body Mass Index.按体重指数划分的私人保险肾移植受者的费用和结局
J Nephrol Ther. 2012;Suppl 4(SI Kidney Transplantation). doi: 10.4172/2161-0959.S4-003. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
Renal Dysfunction in Liver Transplant Candidates: Evaluation, Classification and Management in Contemporary Practice.肝移植候选者的肾功能障碍:当代实践中的评估、分类与管理
J Nephrol Ther. 2012;Suppl 4(SI Kidney Transplantation). doi: 10.4172/2161-0959.S4-006. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
7
Determinants of length of stay after pediatric liver transplantation.小儿肝移植术后住院时间的决定因素。
Pediatr Transplant. 2020 Jun;24(4):e13702. doi: 10.1111/petr.13702. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
Potential savings in the treatment pathway of liver transplantation: an inter-sectorial analysis of cost-rising factors.肝移植治疗途径的潜在节省:成本上升因素的跨部门分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):281-301. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0994-y. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
9
MELD as a metric for survival benefit of liver transplantation.MELD 作为肝移植生存获益的衡量指标。
Am J Transplant. 2018 May;18(5):1231-1237. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14660. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
10
Fifteen-Year Trends in Pediatric Liver Transplants: Split, Whole Deceased, and Living Donor Grafts.15 年儿童肝移植趋势:劈离式、全遗体和活体供肝移植。
J Pediatr. 2018 May;196:148-153.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.015. Epub 2018 Jan 4.