Hancox Robert J
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2006 Oct-Dec;31(2-3):279-88. doi: 10.1385/criai:31:2:279.
Beta-agonists have clearly demonstrated benefits for the treatment of both acute and chronic asthma. Therefore, it is perhaps surprising that many of the articles in this issue have focused on concerns about their safety. Much of this concern can be traced back to the "beta-agonist controversy"--the association of high-dose isoprenaline and fenoterol inhalers with asthma mortality in the 1960s and 1970s. Although a causal link was never proven, lingering doubts about the safety of beta-agonists remain. It is unclear whether a similar adverse effect is responsible for recently reported association of long-acting beta-agonists with asthma deaths. No mechanism for the beta-agonist controversy was established, but the evidence presented in this collection of articles points to a number of contributing factors. I suggest that a combination of these effects provides a plausible mechanism for the association of frequent beta-agonist use with asthma mortality. Rebound bronchoconstriction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness occur on withdrawal of regular beta-agonist treatment. Regular use of fenoterol is associated with a reduction in morning peak flow suggesting that the overnight interval between doses is sufficient to allow rebound bronchoconstriction. This has not been observed with terbutaline or salbutamol, although rebound phenomena do occur when these drugs are withdrawn for slightly longer periods. Regular use of beta-agonists also leads to tolerance to their bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects. Tolerance becomes more apparent with worsening bronchoconstriction. In severe asthma, this could result in a poor response to emergency treatment. The combination of rebound deterioration of asthma and a poor response to beta-agonist treatment resulting from tolerance could explain the increased mortality associated with fenoterol and isoprenaline. Both effects are probably caused by downregulation of beta-receptors which occurs with all beta-agonists. Long-acing beta-agonists cause a similar degree of tolerance to short-acting beta-agonists, but avoid the problem of overnight withdrawal. Long-acting beta-agonists have also been shown to improve asthma control when taken in combination with inhaled corticosteroids. The clinical significance of tolerance in this context remains to be determined.
β-激动剂已明确显示出对急性和慢性哮喘治疗的益处。因此,本期的许多文章都聚焦于对其安全性的担忧,这或许令人惊讶。这种担忧很大程度上可追溯到“β-激动剂争议”——20世纪60年代和70年代高剂量异丙肾上腺素和非诺特罗吸入器与哮喘死亡率的关联。尽管从未证实存在因果关系,但对β-激动剂安全性的疑虑依然存在。目前尚不清楚近期报道的长效β-激动剂与哮喘死亡之间的关联是否由类似的不良反应所致。β-激动剂争议的机制尚未明确,但本系列文章中所呈现的证据指出了一些促成因素。我认为这些效应的综合作用为频繁使用β-激动剂与哮喘死亡率之间的关联提供了一个合理的机制。在停用常规β-激动剂治疗时会出现反跳性支气管收缩和支气管高反应性。规律使用非诺特罗与晨间峰值流速降低有关,这表明剂量之间的夜间间隔足以引发反跳性支气管收缩。特布他林或沙丁胺醇未观察到这种情况,尽管当这些药物停药时间稍长时确实会出现反跳现象。规律使用β-激动剂还会导致对其支气管保护和支气管扩张作用产生耐受性。随着支气管收缩加剧,耐受性会更加明显。在重度哮喘中,这可能导致对紧急治疗反应不佳。哮喘反跳性恶化与因耐受性导致的对β-激动剂治疗反应不佳相结合,可能解释了与非诺特罗和异丙肾上腺素相关的死亡率增加。这两种效应可能都是由所有β-激动剂都会出现的β受体下调所引起的。长效β-激动剂对短效β-激动剂产生的耐受性程度相似,但避免了夜间停药的问题。长效β-激动剂与吸入性糖皮质激素联合使用时,也已显示出能改善哮喘控制。在这种情况下,耐受性的临床意义仍有待确定。