Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Dose Response. 2006 May 1;3(3):342-52. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.003.03.005.
Regression models are routinely used in many applied sciences for describing the relationship between a response variable and an independent variable. Statistical inferences on the regression parameters are often performed using the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE). In the case of nonlinear models the standard errors of MLE are often obtained by linearizing the nonlinear function around the true parameter and by appealing to large sample theory. In this article we demonstrate, through computer simulations, that the resulting asymptotic Wald confidence intervals cannot be trusted to achieve the desired confidence levels. Sometimes they could underestimate the true nominal level and are thus liberal. Hence one needs to be cautious in using the usual linearized standard errors of MLE and the associated confidence intervals.
回归模型在许多应用科学中被常规地用于描述因变量和自变量之间的关系。通常使用最大似然估计量(MLE)对回归参数进行统计推断。在非线性模型的情况下,通过围绕真实参数对非线性函数进行线性化,并诉诸大样本理论,来获得 MLE 的标准误差。在本文中,我们通过计算机模拟证明,所得渐近 Wald 置信区间不能被信任以达到所需的置信水平。有时,它们可能低估真实的名义水平,因此是宽松的。因此,在使用 MLE 的常用线性化标准误差和相关置信区间时,需要谨慎。