• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在调查羊膜检测法(AmnioSense method)用于检测胎膜早破的可靠性。

Prospective cohort study investigating the reliability of the AmnioSense method for detection of spontaneous rupture of membranes.

作者信息

Mulhair L, Carter J, Poston L, Seed P, Briley A

机构信息

Women's Health Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(2):313-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01828.x. Epub 2008 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01828.x
PMID:18652589
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the reliability, sensitivity and specificity of a commercially available absorbent pad, AmnioSense, compared with speculum examination for detection of spontaneous ruptured membranes (SRM).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Antenatal Day Unit (ADU) of a UK inner-city teaching hospital.

POPULATION

Women attending the ADU with a history of suspected ruptured membranes between 18 and 42 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Eligible women were asked to use the absorbent pad in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. A midwife recorded the result. A second midwife performed a speculum examination according to unit protocol. Results were entered onto a password-protected study-specific database. Both midwives were blind to the other test result.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparability between the index test (AmnioSense) and reference standard (speculum).

RESULTS

A total of 157 women were recruited and results were analysed in 139 cases. Median gestational age at recruitment was 37(+2) weeks. The prevalence of SRM was 42% (59/139) with AmnioSense giving a sensitivity of 98% (58/59) and specificity of 65% (52/80).

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-eight percent (53/139 women) with SRM would have been correctly identified as having intact membranes without the need for a speculum examination. Twenty-five percent of AmnioSense false-positive results were associated with positive high vaginal swab results (7/28). These data suggest that a negative AmnioSense result can provide reassurance of intact membranes. Use of the AmnioSense test before considering speculum examination could reduce the number of speculum examinations undertaken, with benefit to women and concomitant health resource savings.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了一种市售吸收垫AmnioSense与窥器检查相比,用于检测胎膜早破(SRM)的可靠性、敏感性和特异性。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

英国市中心一家教学医院的产前日间病房(ADU)。

研究对象

妊娠18至42周因疑似胎膜破裂病史而到ADU就诊的女性。

方法

符合条件的女性被要求按照制造商的说明使用吸收垫。一名助产士记录结果。另一名助产士根据科室规程进行窥器检查。结果录入受密码保护的特定研究数据库。两名助产士均对另一个检测结果不知情。

主要观察指标

指标检测(AmnioSense)与参考标准(窥器检查)之间的可比性。

结果

共招募了157名女性,对139例的结果进行了分析。招募时的中位孕周为37(+2)周。AmnioSense检测到的SRM患病率为42%(59/139),敏感性为98%(58/59),特异性为65%(52/80)。

结论

38%(53/139名女性)的胎膜早破患者无需进行窥器检查就能被正确判定为胎膜完整。AmnioSense 25%的假阳性结果与高阴道拭子阳性结果相关(7/28)。这些数据表明,AmnioSense检测结果为阴性可使人放心胎膜完整。在考虑进行窥器检查之前使用AmnioSense检测可减少窥器检查的次数,对女性有益并能节省相应的医疗资源。

相似文献

1
Prospective cohort study investigating the reliability of the AmnioSense method for detection of spontaneous rupture of membranes.一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在调查羊膜检测法(AmnioSense method)用于检测胎膜早破的可靠性。
BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(2):313-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01828.x. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
2
Is a speculum examination sufficient for excluding the diagnosis of ruptured fetal membranes?窥器检查足以排除胎膜破裂的诊断吗?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Sep;76(8):739-42. doi: 10.3109/00016349709024339.
3
Association between lactate in vaginal fluid and time to spontaneous onset of labour for women with suspected prelabour rupture of the membranes.胎膜早破疑似患者阴道液中乳酸水平与自然临产时间的相关性
BJOG. 2006 Dec;113(12):1426-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01088.x.
4
Effectiveness of a novel home-based testing device for the detection of rupture of membranes.
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Jan;26(1):45-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1095183. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
5
Comparative study of three amniotic fluid markers in premature rupture of membranes: prolactin, beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin, and alpha-fetoprotein.胎膜早破中三种羊水标志物的比较研究:催乳素、人绒毛膜促性腺激素β亚基和甲胎蛋白。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;63(4):195-9. doi: 10.1159/000097844. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
6
Lactate determination in vaginal fluids: a new method in the diagnosis of prelabour rupture of membranes.阴道液中乳酸盐的测定:一种诊断胎膜早破的新方法。
BJOG. 2005 Jun;112(6):754-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00521.x.
7
[Detection of rupture of fetal membranes using a commercially available fibronectin test kit].[使用市售纤维连接蛋白检测试剂盒检测胎膜破裂]
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1992 Nov-Dec;196(6):242-3.
8
Prediction of time to spontaneous onset of labour with lactate concentration in vaginal fluid in women with suspected preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes.胎膜早破疑似早产女性阴道液乳酸浓度预测自然临产时间
BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(1):62-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02017.x.
9
Diagnosing rupture of membranes using combination monoclonal/polyclonal immunologic protein detection.使用单克隆/多克隆免疫蛋白检测组合诊断胎膜破裂。
J Reprod Med. 2013 May-Jun;58(5-6):187-94.
10
Significance of detecting insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in cervicovaginal secretions: comparison with nitrazine test and amniotic fluid volume assessment.检测宫颈阴道分泌物中胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-1的意义:与石蕊试纸试验及羊水量评估的比较
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jul;83(7):622-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00343.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Vision Amniotic Leak Detector (ALD) to Eliminate Amniotic Fluid Leakage as a Cause of Vaginal Wetness in Pregnancy: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.视觉羊水渗漏检测仪(ALD):消除羊水渗漏作为孕期阴道湿润原因的研究:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所医疗技术指南
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Oct;13(5):445-56. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0190-5.
2
Guidelines for the management of spontaneous preterm labor: identification of spontaneous preterm labor, diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preventive tools for preterm birth.自发性早产管理指南:自发性早产的识别、胎膜早破的诊断以及早产的预防措施
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 May;24(5):659-67. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.553694. Epub 2011 Mar 2.