• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类体验与产品可用性:辅助设计用户与产品交互的原则。

Human experience and product usability: principles to assist the design of user-product interactions.

作者信息

Chamorro-Koc Marianella, Popovic Vesna, Emmison Michael

机构信息

School of Design, Faculty of Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St, GPO 2434 Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):648-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.05.004
PMID:18653170
Abstract

This paper introduces research that investigates how human experience influences people's understandings of product usability. It describes an experiment that employs visual representation of concepts to elicit participants' ideas of a product's use. Results from the experiment lead to the identification of relationships between human experience, knowledge, and context-of-use--relationships that influence designers' and users' concepts of product usability. These relationships are translated into design principles that inform the design activity with respect to the aspects of experience that trigger people's understanding of a product's use. A design tool (ECEDT) is devised to aid designers in the application of these principles. This tool is then trialled in the context of a design task in order to verify applicability of the findings.

摘要

本文介绍了一项研究,该研究调查了人类体验如何影响人们对产品可用性的理解。它描述了一个实验,该实验采用概念的视觉表示来引出参与者对产品用途的想法。实验结果导致确定了人类体验、知识和使用情境之间的关系——这些关系影响设计师和用户对产品可用性的概念。这些关系被转化为设计原则,这些原则就引发人们对产品用途理解的体验方面为设计活动提供指导。设计了一种设计工具(ECEDT)来帮助设计师应用这些原则。然后在设计任务的背景下对该工具进行试验,以验证研究结果的适用性。

相似文献

1
Human experience and product usability: principles to assist the design of user-product interactions.人类体验与产品可用性:辅助设计用户与产品交互的原则。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):648-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
2
The amount of ergonomics and user involvement in 151 design processes.151个设计流程中的人机工程学及用户参与程度。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:989-96. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0275-989.
3
Product design and apparent usability. The influence of novelty in product appearance.产品设计与明显可用性。产品外观新颖性的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Nov;43(6):1081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
4
A tool for rapid assessment of product usability and universal design: development and preliminary psychometric testing.
Work. 2011;39(2):141-50. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1160.
5
Towards a capabilities database to inform inclusive design: experimental investigation of effective survey-based predictors of human-product interaction.迈向能力数据库以支持包容性设计:基于调查的有效人类-产品交互预测因子的实验研究。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Jul;43(4):713-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
6
Increasing productivity and reducing errors through usability analysis: a case study and recommendations.通过可用性分析提高生产力并减少错误:一项案例研究与建议
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:394-8.
7
Usability of geographic information -- factors identified from qualitative analysis of task-focused user interviews.地理信息的可用性--从以任务为中心的用户访谈的定性分析中确定的因素。
Appl Ergon. 2013 Nov;44(6):940-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
8
Usability in product development practice; an exploratory case study comparing four markets.产品开发实践中的可用性;一项比较四个市场的探索性案例研究。
Appl Ergon. 2015 Mar;47:308-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
9
Measuring a product's usefulness.衡量产品的实用性。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:5266-73. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0016-5266.
10
The importance of user centered design methods applied to the design of a new workstation: a case study.以用户为中心的设计方法应用于新型工作站设计的重要性:一项案例研究。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:984-8. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0274-984.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of ICT-based intimate partner violence interventions: a systematic review.基于信息通信技术的亲密伴侣暴力干预措施的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):1372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09408-8.
2
Prototyping for context: exploring stakeholder feedback based on prototype type, stakeholder group and question type.情境原型设计:基于原型类型、利益相关者群体和问题类型探索利益相关者反馈
Res Eng Des. 2019 Oct;30(4):453-471. doi: 10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
"Why would you want to stand?" an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention.
员工参与工作场所坐立桌干预的生活体验述评:为何要站立?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 17;19(1):1692. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9.