• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A tool for rapid assessment of product usability and universal design: development and preliminary psychometric testing.

作者信息

Lenker James A, Nasarwanji Mahiyar, Paquet Victor, Feathers David

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Science, School of Public Health & Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.

出版信息

Work. 2011;39(2):141-50. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1160.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-2011-1160
PMID:21673441
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While there are many available tools and methods to evaluate product usability, few have been tested on user groups with disabilities and even fewer systematically consider universal design principles.

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes the development and preliminary psychometric testing of the Rapid Assessment of Product Usability & Universal Design (RAPUUD), a 12-item user-report tool based on the seven principles of universal design.

METHOD

A preliminary set of items was created to elicit ratings of diverse product characteristics (e.g., physical effort, cognitive effort, assistance required, safety). Data were gathered from 61 participants who rated the usability of products they use in their own environments.

RESULTS

Each item elicited a full range of responses, with no apparent floor or ceiling effects. Collectively, the 12 items achieved a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.80). The data indicate that the tool was sensitive to differences in functional abilities, as well as differences in product characteristics. The instrument was usable for a range of consumer products, though not all items were appropriate for each and every product.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the instrument could become a pragmatic tool for designers to identify usability problems experienced by a diversity of user populations.

摘要

相似文献

1
A tool for rapid assessment of product usability and universal design: development and preliminary psychometric testing.
Work. 2011;39(2):141-50. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1160.
2
Human experience and product usability: principles to assist the design of user-product interactions.人类体验与产品可用性:辅助设计用户与产品交互的原则。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):648-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
3
Survey instrument for the universal design of consumer products.消费品通用设计调查工具。
Appl Ergon. 2005 May;36(3):363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.10.014.
4
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
5
Validation of the COURAGE Built Environment Self-Reported Questionnaire.验证 COURAGE 建筑环境自评问卷。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):215-26. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1859. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
6
Usability in product development practice; an exploratory case study comparing four markets.产品开发实践中的可用性;一项比较四个市场的探索性案例研究。
Appl Ergon. 2015 Mar;47:308-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
7
Usability in product design--the importance and need for systematic assessment models in product development--Usa-Design Model (U-D) ©.产品设计中的可用性——产品开发中系统评估模型的重要性与必要性——美国设计模型(U-D)©
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:1045-52. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1011-1045.
8
The amount of ergonomics and user involvement in 151 design processes.151个设计流程中的人机工程学及用户参与程度。
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:989-96. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0275-989.
9
Product design and apparent usability. The influence of novelty in product appearance.产品设计与明显可用性。产品外观新颖性的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Nov;43(6):1081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
10
Practicing universal design to actual hand tool design process.
Appl Ergon. 2015 Sep;50:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived Usability of Tablet Crushers: Comparison of Devices by People with and without Limited Hand Functions.片剂碾碎器的感知易用性:手部功能受限者与非受限者对不同设备的比较。
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 3;15(2):517. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020517.
2
Accessibility Retrofit of a Shared Automated Vehicle: Challenges and Lessons Learned.共享自动驾驶车辆的无障碍改造:挑战与经验教训
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2021 Nov 12;65(1):385-389.
3
How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.
多元化的研究生态系统如何产生新的康复技术:对 NIDILRR 康复工程研究中心的回顾。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0321-3.
4
Design principles to accommodate older adults.适应老年人的设计原则。
Glob J Health Sci. 2012 Feb 29;4(2):2-25. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n2p2.