Shitrit David, Ollech Jacob E, Ollech Ayelet, Peled Nir, Amital Anat, Fox Ben, Kramer Mordechai R
Pulmonary Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqwa, Israel.
Respir Med. 2008 Nov;102(11):1631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.05.008. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
We prospectively assessed the diagnostic value of pleural fluid complement levels (total, C3, C4) in 135 patients with pleural effusion of five main etiologies, using novel markers. Complement levels correlated with pleural levels of protein, amylase, and transuded fluids. On univariate analysis, CHF-related pleural effusions were associated with significantly lower C4 levels than postsurgery or parapneumonic effusions. On multivariate analysis, pleural fluid C4 level was a significant predictor of CHF. Although the specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of the parameters were low in all diagnostic groups, their negative predictive value as well as the AUC ROC was high for CHF and post-LTX. We conclude that pleural fluid C4 levels can differentiate CHF-related pleural effusion from other etiologies and that normal level of C3 or C4 rule out CHF or LTX as causes of pleural effusion. Complement should be included in the assessment of pleural effusion when traditional diagnostic methods fail.
我们前瞻性地评估了135例五种主要病因所致胸腔积液患者胸腔积液补体水平(总补体、C3、C4)的诊断价值,采用了新的标志物。补体水平与胸腔积液中的蛋白质、淀粉酶及漏出液水平相关。单因素分析显示,与心力衰竭(CHF)相关的胸腔积液的C4水平显著低于术后或肺炎旁胸腔积液。多因素分析显示,胸腔积液C4水平是CHF的重要预测指标。尽管所有诊断组中这些参数的特异性、阳性预测值和准确性较低,但它们对CHF和肺移植术后(LTX)的阴性预测值以及曲线下面积(AUC)ROC较高。我们得出结论,胸腔积液C4水平可将CHF相关胸腔积液与其他病因区分开来,C3或C4水平正常可排除CHF或LTX作为胸腔积液的病因。当传统诊断方法无效时,应将补体纳入胸腔积液的评估中。