Edmiston Charles E, Krepel Candace J, Seabrook Gary R, Lewis Brian D, Brown Kellie R, Towne Jonathan B
Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Aug;207(2):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.054. Epub 2008 May 23.
Skin asepsis is a sentinel strategy for reducing risk of surgical site infections. In this study, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) skin concentrations were determined after preoperative showering/skin cleansing using 4% CHG soap or 2% CHG-impregnated polyester cloth.
Subjects were randomized to one of three shower (4% soap)/skin cleansing (2% cloth) groups (n = 20 per group): (group 1 A/B) evening, (group 2 A/B) morning, or (group 3 A/B) evening and morning. After showering or skin cleansing, volunteers returned to the investigator's laboratory where CHG skin surface concentrations were determined at five separate skin sites. CHG concentrations were compared with CHG minimal inhibitory concentration that inhibits 90% (MIC(90)) of staphylococcal skin isolates.
CHG MIC(90) for 61 skin isolates was 4.8 parts per million (ppm). In group 1A, 4% CHG skin concentrations ranged from 17.2 to 31.6 ppm, and CHG concentrations were 361.5 to 589.5 ppm (p < 0.0001) in group 1B (2%). In group 2A (4%), CHG levels ranged from 51.6 to 119.6 ppm and 848.1 to 1,049.6 ppm in group 2B (2%), respectively (p < 0.0001). CHG levels ranged from 101.4 to 149.4 ppm in the 4% CHG group (group 3A) compared with 1,484.6 to 2,031.3 ppm in 2% CHG cloth (group 3B) group (p < 0.0001). Effective CHG levels were not detected in the 4% CHG group in selected sites in seven (35%) subjects in group 1A, three (15%) in group 2A, and five (25%) in group 3A.
Effective CHG levels were achieved on most skin sites after using 4% CHG; gaps in antiseptic coverage were noted at selective sites even after repeated application. Use of the 2% CHG polyester cloth resulted in considerably higher skin concentrations with no gaps in antiseptic coverage. Effective decolonization of the skin before hospital admission can play an important role in reducing risk of surgical site infections.
皮肤无菌操作是降低手术部位感染风险的关键策略。在本研究中,使用4%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)肥皂或2%CHG浸渍聚酯布进行术前沐浴/皮肤清洁后,测定了皮肤CHG浓度。
受试者被随机分为三个沐浴(4%肥皂)/皮肤清洁(2%布)组之一(每组n = 20):(第1组A/B)晚上,(第2组A/B)早上,或(第3组A/B)晚上和早上。沐浴或皮肤清洁后,志愿者返回研究者实验室,在五个不同的皮肤部位测定CHG皮肤表面浓度。将CHG浓度与抑制90%(MIC(90))葡萄球菌皮肤分离株的CHG最低抑菌浓度进行比较。
61株皮肤分离株的CHG MIC(90)为百万分之4.8(ppm)。在第1组A中,4%CHG皮肤浓度范围为17.2至31.6 ppm,而在第1组B(2%)中CHG浓度为361.5至589.5 ppm(p < 0.0001)。在第2组A(4%)中,CHG水平范围为51.6至119.6 ppm,在第2组B(2%)中为848.1至1,049.6 ppm(p < 0.0001)。4%CHG组(第3组A)的CHG水平范围为101.4至149.4 ppm,相比之下,2%CHG布组(第3组B)为1,484.6至2,031.3 ppm(p < 0.0001)。在第1组A的7名(35%)受试者、第2组A的3名(15%)受试者和第3组A的5名(25%)受试者的选定部位,4%CHG组未检测到有效的CHG水平。
使用4%CHG后,大多数皮肤部位达到了有效的CHG水平;即使重复应用,在选择性部位仍注意到抗菌覆盖存在缺口。使用2%CHG聚酯布导致皮肤浓度显著更高,且抗菌覆盖无缺口。入院前对皮肤进行有效的去定植在降低手术部位感染风险方面可发挥重要作用。