Van den Heede Koen, Sermeus Walter, Diya Luwis, Clarke Sean P, Lesaffre Emmanuel, Vleugels Arthur, Aiken Linda H
Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/4, Leuven B-3000, Belgium.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jul;46(7):928-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
Studies have linked nurse staffing levels (number and skill mix) to several nurse-sensitive patient outcomes. However, evidence from European countries has been limited.
This study examines the association between nurse staffing levels (i.e. acuity-adjusted Nursing Hours per Patient Day, the proportion of registered nurses with a Bachelor's degree) and 10 different patient outcomes potentially sensitive to nursing care. DESIGN-SETTING-PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional analyses of linked data from the Belgian Nursing Minimum Dataset (general acute care and intensive care nursing units: n=1403) and Belgian Hospital Discharge Dataset (general, orthopedic and vascular surgery patients: n=260,923) of the year 2003 from all acute hospitals (n=115).
Logistic regression analyses, estimated by using a Generalized Estimation Equation Model, were used to study the association between nurse staffing and patient outcomes.
The mean acuity-adjusted Nursing Hours per Patient Day in Belgian hospitals was 2.62 (S.D.=0.29). The variability in patient outcome rates between hospitals is considerable. The inter-quartile ranges for the 10 patient outcomes go from 0.35 for Deep Venous Thrombosis to 3.77 for failure-to-rescue. No significant association was found between the acuity-adjusted Nursing Hours per Patient Day, proportion of registered nurses with a Bachelor's degree and the selected patient outcomes.
The absence of associations between hospital-level nurse staffing measures and patient outcomes should not be inferred as implying that nurse staffing does not have an impact on patient outcomes in Belgian hospitals. To better understand the dynamics of the nurse staffing and patient outcomes relationship in acute hospitals, further analyses (i.e. nursing unit level analyses) of these and other outcomes are recommended, in addition to inclusion of other study variables, including data about nursing practice environments in hospitals.
研究已将护士配备水平(数量和技能组合)与若干对护士敏感的患者结局联系起来。然而,来自欧洲国家的证据有限。
本研究考察护士配备水平(即按病情严重程度调整的每日每位患者护理时长、拥有学士学位的注册护士比例)与10种可能对护理敏感的不同患者结局之间的关联。设计-地点-参与者:对来自比利时护理最低数据集(普通急症护理和重症护理单元:n = 1403)和2003年比利时医院出院数据集(普通、骨科和血管外科患者:n = 260,923)的关联数据进行横断面分析,数据来自所有急症医院(n = 115)。
采用广义估计方程模型估计的逻辑回归分析来研究护士配备与患者结局之间的关联。
比利时医院平均按病情严重程度调整的每日每位患者护理时长为2.62(标准差 = 0.29)。各医院之间患者结局发生率的差异相当大。10种患者结局的四分位间距从深静脉血栓形成的0.35到未能挽救的3.77不等。在按病情严重程度调整的每日每位患者护理时长、拥有学士学位的注册护士比例与所选患者结局之间未发现显著关联。
不应推断医院层面的护士配备措施与患者结局之间不存在关联就意味着护士配备对比利时医院的患者结局没有影响。为了更好地理解急症医院中护士配备与患者结局关系的动态变化,除了纳入其他研究变量,包括有关医院护理实践环境的数据外,建议对这些及其他结局进行进一步分析(即护理单元层面分析)。