Siddiq Farhan, Vazquez Gabriela, Memon Muhammad Zeeshan, Suri M Fareed K, Taylor Robert A, Wojak Joan C, Chaloupka John C, Qureshi Adnan I
Department of Neurosurgery, D-429, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Stroke. 2008 Sep;39(9):2505-10. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.515361. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
We sought to compare the clinical outcomes between primary angioplasty and stent placement for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis.
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and angiographic data of 190 patients treated with 95 primary angioplasty procedures and 98 intracranial stent placements (total of 193 procedures) in 3 tertiary care centers. Stroke and combined stroke and/or death were identified as primary clinical end points during the periprocedural and follow-up period of 5 years. The rates of significant postoperative residual stenosis (>/=50% of greater stenosis immediately after the procedure) and binary restenosis (>/=50% stenosis at follow-up angiography within 3 years) were also compared. The comparative analysis was performed after adjusting for age, sex, and center.
Fourteen procedures in the angioplasty-treated group (15%) and 4 in the stent-treated group (4.1%) had significant postoperative residual stenosis (relative risk [RR]=2.8, 95% CI, 0.85 to 9.5, P=0.09, for the adjusted model). There were 3 periprocedural deaths (1.5%), 1 in the angioplasty group (1.1%) and 2 in the stent-treated group (2.0%) and 14 periprocedural strokes (7.3%), 7 periprocedural strokes in each group (7.4% and 7.1%, respectively; hazard ratio=1.1; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.9, P=0.85). Angiographic follow-up was available for 134 procedures (66 angioplasty-treated and 68 stent-treated cases). Forty-eight procedures (36.1%) had evidence of binary restenosis (25 of 66 angioplasties, 23 of 68 stents, P=0.85). Binary restenosis-free survival at 12 months was 68% for the angioplasty-treated group and 64% for the stent-treated group. There was no difference in follow-up survival (stroke, or stroke and/or death) between the angioplasty-treated and the stent-treated groups (hazard ratio=0.54; 95% CI, 0.11 to 2.5, P=0.44 and hazard ratio=0.50; 95%, CI 0.17 to 1.5, P=0.22, respectively, after adjusting for age, sex, and center). The stroke- and/or death-free survival at 2 years for the angioplasty-treated group and the stent-treated group was 92+/-4% and 89+/-5%, respectively.
Stent treatment for intracranial atherosclerosis may lower the rate of significant postoperative residual stenosis compared with primary angioplasty alone. No benefit of stent placement over primary angioplasty in reducing stroke or stroke and/or death could be identified in this study.
我们旨在比较症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化患者接受单纯血管成形术与支架置入术的临床疗效。
我们回顾性分析了3家三级医疗中心190例患者的临床及血管造影数据,这些患者接受了95例单纯血管成形术和98例颅内支架置入术(共193例手术)。将卒中以及卒中合并死亡作为围手术期及5年随访期的主要临床终点。同时比较术后严重残余狭窄(术后即刻狭窄≥50%或更严重狭窄)及再狭窄(3年内随访血管造影显示狭窄≥50%)的发生率。在对年龄、性别和中心进行校正后进行比较分析。
血管成形术治疗组有14例手术(15%)出现术后严重残余狭窄,支架治疗组有4例(4.1%)出现术后严重残余狭窄(校正模型的相对风险[RR]=2.8,95%可信区间[CI]为0.85至9.5,P=0.09)。围手术期有3例死亡(1.5%),血管成形术组1例(1.1%),支架治疗组2例(2.0%);围手术期有14例卒中(7.3%),每组各7例(分别为7.4%和7.1%;风险比=1.1;95%CI为0.57至1.9,P=0.85)。134例手术(66例血管成形术治疗和68例支架治疗病例)有血管造影随访数据。48例手术(36.1%)有再狭窄证据(66例血管成形术中有25例,68例支架中有23例,P=0.85)。血管成形术治疗组12个月时无再狭窄生存率为68%,支架治疗组为64%。血管成形术治疗组与支架治疗组在随访生存率(卒中或卒中合并死亡)方面无差异(校正年龄、性别和中心后,风险比分别为0.54;95%CI为0.11至2.5,P=0.44和风险比为0.50;95%CI为0.17至1.5,P=0.22)。血管成形术治疗组和支架治疗组2年时无卒中及死亡生存率分别为92±4%和89±5%。
与单纯血管成形术相比,颅内动脉粥样硬化的支架治疗可能降低术后严重残余狭窄的发生率。本研究未发现支架置入术在降低卒中或卒中合并死亡方面优于单纯血管成形术。