Suppr超能文献

来自质体基因组的多个多基因座DNA条形码在区分植物物种方面同样出色。

Multiple multilocus DNA barcodes from the plastid genome discriminate plant species equally well.

作者信息

Fazekas Aron J, Burgess Kevin S, Kesanakurti Prasad R, Graham Sean W, Newmaster Steven G, Husband Brian C, Percy Diana M, Hajibabaei Mehrdad, Barrett Spencer C H

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2008 Jul 30;3(7):e2802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002802.

Abstract

A universal barcode system for land plants would be a valuable resource, with potential utility in fields as diverse as ecology, floristics, law enforcement and industry. However, the application of plant barcoding has been constrained by a lack of consensus regarding the most variable and technically practical DNA region(s). We compared eight candidate plant barcoding regions from the plastome and one from the mitochondrial genome for how well they discriminated the monophyly of 92 species in 32 diverse genera of land plants (N = 251 samples). The plastid markers comprise portions of five coding (rpoB, rpoC1, rbcL, matK and 23S rDNA) and three non-coding (trnH-psbA, atpF-atpH, and psbK-psbI) loci. Our survey included several taxonomically complex groups, and in all cases we examined multiple populations and species. The regions differed in their ability to discriminate species, and in ease of retrieval, in terms of amplification and sequencing success. Single locus resolution ranged from 7% (23S rDNA) to 59% (trnH-psbA) of species with well-supported monophyly. Sequence recovery rates were related primarily to amplification success (85-100% for plastid loci), with matK requiring the greatest effort to achieve reasonable recovery (88% using 10 primer pairs). Several loci (matK, psbK-psbI, trnH-psbA) were problematic for generating fully bidirectional sequences. Setting aside technical issues related to amplification and sequencing, combining the more variable plastid markers provided clear benefits for resolving species, although with diminishing returns, as all combinations assessed using four to seven regions had only marginally different success rates (69-71%; values that were approached by several two- and three-region combinations). This performance plateau may indicate fundamental upper limits on the precision of species discrimination that is possible with DNA barcoding systems that include moderate numbers of plastid markers. Resolution to the contentious debate on plant barcoding should therefore involve increased attention to practical issues related to the ease of sequence recovery, global alignability, and marker redundancy in multilocus plant DNA barcoding systems.

摘要

一个适用于陆地植物的通用条形码系统将是一项宝贵的资源,在生态学、植物区系学、执法和工业等诸多不同领域都具有潜在用途。然而,植物条形码的应用受到限制,原因是对于最具变异性且在技术上可行的DNA区域缺乏共识。我们比较了来自质体基因组的八个候选植物条形码区域和来自线粒体基因组的一个区域,看它们在区分32个不同属的92种陆地植物(N = 251个样本)的单系性方面表现如何。质体标记包括五个编码区(rpoB、rpoC1、rbcL、matK和23S rDNA)和三个非编码区(trnH-psbA、atpF-atpH和psbK-psbI)的部分。我们的调查涵盖了几个分类学上复杂的类群,并且在所有情况下我们都检查了多个种群和物种。这些区域在区分物种的能力以及在扩增和测序成功率方面的检索难易程度上存在差异。单一位点分辨率在能得到有力支持的单系性物种中从7%(23S rDNA)到59%(trnH-psbA)不等。序列回收率主要与扩增成功率相关(质体基因座为85 - 100%),matK要获得合理的回收率需要付出最大努力(使用10对引物时为88%)。几个基因座(matK、psbK-psbI、trnH-psbA)在生成完全双向序列方面存在问题。抛开与扩增和测序相关的技术问题不谈,组合使用变异性更强的质体标记在解析物种方面有明显益处,不过收益递减,因为使用四到七个区域评估的所有组合的成功率仅略有不同(69 - 71%;一些两个和三个区域的组合也接近这个值)。这种性能平稳状态可能表明,对于包含适度数量质体标记的DNA条形码系统来说,在物种区分精度方面存在基本的上限。因此,要解决关于植物条形码的有争议的辩论,应该更多地关注与序列回收的难易程度、全局比对性以及多位点植物DNA条形码系统中的标记冗余度相关的实际问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca7b/2475660/0030ead66b9b/pone.0002802.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验