Suppr超能文献

选择植物的条形码基因座:在三个陆地植物分歧群中对七个候选基因座进行物种水平采样的评估。

Selecting barcoding loci for plants: evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants.

机构信息

Royal Botanic Garden, 20 Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, TW9 3DS, UK Département Systématique et Evolution, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 16 Rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France.

出版信息

Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Mar;9(2):439-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02439.x. Epub 2009 Jan 31.

Abstract

There has been considerable debate, but little consensus regarding locus choice for DNA barcoding land plants. This is partly attributable to a shortage of comparable data from all proposed candidate loci on a common set of samples. In this study, we evaluated the seven main candidate plastid regions (rpoC1, rpoB, rbcL, matK, trnH-psbA, atpF-atpH, psbK-psbI) in three divergent groups of land plants [Inga (angiosperm); Araucaria (gymnosperm); Asterella s.l. (liverwort)]. Across these groups, no single locus showed high levels of universality and resolvability. Interspecific sharing of sequences from individual loci was common. However, when multiple loci were combined, fewer barcodes were shared among species. Evaluation of the performance of previously published suggestions of particular multilocus barcode combinations showed broadly equivalent performance. Minor improvements on these were obtained by various new three-locus combinations involving rpoC1, rbcL, matK and trnH-psbA, but no single combination clearly outperformed all others. In terms of absolute discriminatory power, promising results occurred in liverworts (e.g. c. 90% species discrimination based on rbcL alone). However, Inga (rapid radiation) and Araucaria (slow rates of substitution) represent challenging groups for DNA barcoding, and their corresponding levels of species discrimination reflect this (upper estimate of species discrimination = 69% in Inga and only 32% in Araucaria; mean = 60% averaging all three groups).

摘要

对于陆地植物的 DNA 条形码基因座选择,存在大量的争论,但很少达成共识。这部分归因于缺乏来自所有拟议候选基因座在共同样本集中的可比数据。在这项研究中,我们评估了三个不同陆地植物群(豆科植物 Inga;裸子植物南洋杉科 Araucaria;地钱 Asterella s.l.)的七个主要候选质体区域(rpoC1、rpoB、rbcL、matK、trnH-psbA、atpF-atpH、psbK-psbI)。在这些群体中,没有一个基因座表现出高度的普遍性和分辨率。来自个别基因座的序列在种间共享是很常见的。然而,当多个基因座组合时,物种之间共享的条形码较少。对先前发表的特定多位点条形码组合建议的性能评估表明,它们的性能大致相当。通过涉及 rpoC1、rbcL、matK 和 trnH-psbA 的各种新的三基因座组合,可以获得对这些建议的微小改进,但没有任何单一组合明显优于其他组合。就绝对鉴别力而言,地钱(例如,仅基于 rbcL 就可区分约 90%的物种)的结果很有前景。然而,豆科植物(快速辐射)和南洋杉科植物(替代率慢)代表 DNA 条形码的挑战群体,它们相应的物种鉴别能力反映了这一点(豆科植物的物种鉴别力上限估计值为 69%,而南洋杉科植物仅为 32%;平均值为 60%,平均所有三个群体)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验