Royal Botanic Garden, 20 Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, TW9 3DS, UK Département Systématique et Evolution, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 16 Rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Mar;9(2):439-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02439.x. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
There has been considerable debate, but little consensus regarding locus choice for DNA barcoding land plants. This is partly attributable to a shortage of comparable data from all proposed candidate loci on a common set of samples. In this study, we evaluated the seven main candidate plastid regions (rpoC1, rpoB, rbcL, matK, trnH-psbA, atpF-atpH, psbK-psbI) in three divergent groups of land plants [Inga (angiosperm); Araucaria (gymnosperm); Asterella s.l. (liverwort)]. Across these groups, no single locus showed high levels of universality and resolvability. Interspecific sharing of sequences from individual loci was common. However, when multiple loci were combined, fewer barcodes were shared among species. Evaluation of the performance of previously published suggestions of particular multilocus barcode combinations showed broadly equivalent performance. Minor improvements on these were obtained by various new three-locus combinations involving rpoC1, rbcL, matK and trnH-psbA, but no single combination clearly outperformed all others. In terms of absolute discriminatory power, promising results occurred in liverworts (e.g. c. 90% species discrimination based on rbcL alone). However, Inga (rapid radiation) and Araucaria (slow rates of substitution) represent challenging groups for DNA barcoding, and their corresponding levels of species discrimination reflect this (upper estimate of species discrimination = 69% in Inga and only 32% in Araucaria; mean = 60% averaging all three groups).
对于陆地植物的 DNA 条形码基因座选择,存在大量的争论,但很少达成共识。这部分归因于缺乏来自所有拟议候选基因座在共同样本集中的可比数据。在这项研究中,我们评估了三个不同陆地植物群(豆科植物 Inga;裸子植物南洋杉科 Araucaria;地钱 Asterella s.l.)的七个主要候选质体区域(rpoC1、rpoB、rbcL、matK、trnH-psbA、atpF-atpH、psbK-psbI)。在这些群体中,没有一个基因座表现出高度的普遍性和分辨率。来自个别基因座的序列在种间共享是很常见的。然而,当多个基因座组合时,物种之间共享的条形码较少。对先前发表的特定多位点条形码组合建议的性能评估表明,它们的性能大致相当。通过涉及 rpoC1、rbcL、matK 和 trnH-psbA 的各种新的三基因座组合,可以获得对这些建议的微小改进,但没有任何单一组合明显优于其他组合。就绝对鉴别力而言,地钱(例如,仅基于 rbcL 就可区分约 90%的物种)的结果很有前景。然而,豆科植物(快速辐射)和南洋杉科植物(替代率慢)代表 DNA 条形码的挑战群体,它们相应的物种鉴别能力反映了这一点(豆科植物的物种鉴别力上限估计值为 69%,而南洋杉科植物仅为 32%;平均值为 60%,平均所有三个群体)。