Titt U, Sahoo N, Ding X, Zheng Y, Newhauser W D, Zhu X R, Polf J C, Gillin M T, Mohan R
The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 21;53(16):4455-70. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/16/016. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
In recent years, the Monte Carlo method has been used in a large number of research studies in radiation therapy. For applications such as treatment planning, it is essential to validate the dosimetric accuracy of the Monte Carlo simulations in heterogeneous media. The AAPM Report no 105 addresses issues concerning clinical implementation of Monte Carlo based treatment planning for photon and electron beams, however for proton-therapy planning, such guidance is not yet available. Here we present the results of our validation of the Monte Carlo model of the double scattering system used at our Proton Therapy Center in Houston. In this study, we compared Monte Carlo simulated depth doses and lateral profiles to measured data for a magnitude of beam parameters. We varied simulated proton energies and widths of the spread-out Bragg peaks, and compared them to measurements obtained during the commissioning phase of the Proton Therapy Center in Houston. Of 191 simulated data sets, 189 agreed with measured data sets to within 3% of the maximum dose difference and within 3 mm of the maximum range or penumbra size difference. The two simulated data sets that did not agree with the measured data sets were in the distal falloff of the measured dose distribution, where large dose gradients potentially produce large differences on the basis of minute changes in the beam steering. Hence, the Monte Carlo models of medium- and large-size double scattering proton-therapy nozzles were valid for proton beams in the 100 MeV-250 MeV interval.
近年来,蒙特卡罗方法已被用于大量放射治疗的研究中。对于治疗计划等应用,验证蒙特卡罗模拟在非均匀介质中的剂量学准确性至关重要。美国医学物理学家协会第105号报告讨论了基于蒙特卡罗的光子和电子束治疗计划临床实施的相关问题,然而对于质子治疗计划,尚无此类指导。在此,我们展示了对休斯顿质子治疗中心使用的双散射系统蒙特卡罗模型验证的结果。在本研究中,我们将蒙特卡罗模拟的深度剂量和横向剂量分布与一系列束流参数的测量数据进行了比较。我们改变了模拟质子能量和扩展布拉格峰的宽度,并将其与休斯顿质子治疗中心调试阶段获得的测量结果进行了比较。在这191个模拟数据集中,189个与测量数据集的最大剂量差异在3%以内,最大射程或半影尺寸差异在3毫米以内。两个与测量数据集不一致的模拟数据集处于测量剂量分布的远端剂量下降区,在该区域大剂量梯度可能会因束流方向的微小变化而产生较大差异。因此,中大型双散射质子治疗喷嘴的蒙特卡罗模型对于100 MeV - 250 MeV区间的质子束是有效的。