• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多排螺旋计算机断层血管造影术评估支架内再狭窄:诊断性能的荟萃分析

Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.

作者信息

Vanhoenacker Piet K, Decramer Isabel, Bladt Olivier, Sarno Giovanna, Van Hul Erik, Wijns William, Dwamena Ben A

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Imaging, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2008 Jul 31;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-8-14.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2342-8-14
PMID:18671850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2533305/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA)of the coronary arteries after stenting has been evaluated in multiple studies.The purpose of this study was to perform a structured review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MDCTA for the detection of in-stent restenosis in the coronary arteries.

METHODS

A Pubmed and manual search of the literature on in-stent restenosis (ISR) detected on MDCTA compared with conventional coronary angiography (CA) was performed. Bivariate summary receiver operating curve (SROC) analysis, with calculation of summary estimates was done on a stent and patient basis. In addition, the influence of study characteristics on diagnostic performance and number of non-assessable segments (NAP) was investigated with logistic meta-regression.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. On a stent basis, Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82(0.72-0.89) and 0.91 (0.83-0.96). Pooled negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio were 0.20 (0.13-0.32) and 9.34 (4.68-18.62) respectively. The exclusion of non-assessable stents and the strut thickness of the stents had an influence on the diagnostic performance. The proportion of non-assessable stents was influenced by the number of detectors, stent diameter, strut thickness and the use of an edge-enhancing kernel.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of MDTCA for the detection of in-stent stenosis is insufficient to use this test to select patients for further invasive testing as with this strategy around 20% of the patients with in-stent stenosis would be missed. Further improvement of scanner technology is needed before it can be recommended as a triage instrument in practice. In addition, the number of non-assessable stents is also high.

摘要

背景

多项研究已对冠状动脉支架置入术后的多排螺旋CT血管造影(MDCTA)进行了评估。本研究的目的是对MDCTA检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的诊断性能进行结构化综述和荟萃分析。

方法

对MDCTA检测到的支架内再狭窄(ISR)与传统冠状动脉造影(CA)相关的文献进行了PubMed检索和手动检索。在支架和患者层面进行双变量汇总接受者操作特征曲线(SROC)分析,并计算汇总估计值。此外,通过逻辑荟萃回归研究了研究特征对诊断性能和不可评估节段数(NAP)的影响。

结果

纳入了14项研究。在支架层面,汇总敏感性和特异性分别为0.82(0.72 - 0.89)和0.91(0.83 - 0.96)。汇总阴性似然比和阳性似然比分别为0.20(0.13 - 0.32)和9.34(4.68 - 18.62)。排除不可评估的支架以及支架的支柱厚度对诊断性能有影响。不可评估支架的比例受探测器数量、支架直径、支柱厚度和边缘增强内核的使用影响。

结论

MDTCA检测支架内狭窄的敏感性不足以用于选择患者进行进一步的侵入性检测,因为采用这种策略会遗漏约20%的支架内狭窄患者。在其能够被推荐作为实际的分诊工具之前,需要进一步改进扫描仪技术。此外,不可评估支架的数量也很多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/b963237674f4/1471-2342-8-14-9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/0ba0b8faa259/1471-2342-8-14-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/e4d9a9dc429b/1471-2342-8-14-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/f3b570b723ee/1471-2342-8-14-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/1b7d214b197d/1471-2342-8-14-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/8735ebd3dfcb/1471-2342-8-14-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/bda1152e0efe/1471-2342-8-14-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/054f1ce52930/1471-2342-8-14-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/b963237674f4/1471-2342-8-14-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/b963237674f4/1471-2342-8-14-9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/0ba0b8faa259/1471-2342-8-14-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/e4d9a9dc429b/1471-2342-8-14-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/f3b570b723ee/1471-2342-8-14-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/1b7d214b197d/1471-2342-8-14-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/8735ebd3dfcb/1471-2342-8-14-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/bda1152e0efe/1471-2342-8-14-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/054f1ce52930/1471-2342-8-14-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/b963237674f4/1471-2342-8-14-8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5871/2533305/b963237674f4/1471-2342-8-14-9.jpg

相似文献

1
Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.多排螺旋计算机断层血管造影术评估支架内再狭窄:诊断性能的荟萃分析
BMC Med Imaging. 2008 Jul 31;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-8-14.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis.64 层多层螺旋 CT 血管造影术评估冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性:荟萃分析。
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Feb;73(2):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.025. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
3
Prevalence and prognosis of coronary stent gap detected by multi-detector CT: a follow-up study.多排螺旋 CT 检测冠状动脉支架间隙的发生率及其对预后的影响:一项随访研究。
Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep;22(9):1896-903. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2458-6. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.320 排多层螺旋 CT 冠状动脉成像无创评估支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性。
Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun;45(6):331-40. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa312.
5
Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review.多排探测器CT血管造影术在评估冠状动脉支架内再狭窄中的应用:一项系统评价
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Mar;69(3):489-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.030. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
6
Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis.64 层 CT 评价冠状动脉支架内再狭窄:影响评估和准确诊断的因素。
J Thorac Imaging. 2010 Feb;25(1):57-63. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181b5d813.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT for detection of in-stent restenosis in an unselected, consecutive patient population.64 层多排螺旋 CT 对未经选择的连续患者人群中支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性。
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Nov;76(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.030. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
8
Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT.应用64排CT对既往有冠状动脉支架植入史的患者进行评估。
Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):416-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452061199. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
9
Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.计算机断层血管造影术在检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄中的诊断性能:一项更新荟萃分析的证据。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1373-1382. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5097-0. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography.64层螺旋CT血管造影术检测椎动脉开口支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性:与传统血管造影术的比较
Acta Radiol. 2014 Oct;55(8):1000-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113507922. Epub 2013 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.计算机断层血管造影术在检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄中的诊断性能:一项更新荟萃分析的证据。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1373-1382. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5097-0. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
2
Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT.韩国心脏CT合理使用指南。
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;16(2):251-85. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.251. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
3
In-vitro assessment of coronary artery stents in 256-multislice computed tomography angiography.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis.多层螺旋CT血管造影术评估冠状动脉疾病的诊断性能:荟萃分析
Radiology. 2007 Aug;244(2):419-28. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442061218.
2
We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews.我们不应在系统评价中合并诊断似然比。
Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):687-97. doi: 10.1002/sim.2992.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
256层计算机断层扫描血管造影术中冠状动脉支架的体外评估
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jan 14;7:38. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-38.
4
Prognostic value of dual-source multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stent implantation.双源多层螺旋 CT 冠状动脉成像对支架植入患者的预后价值。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;29(7):1603-11. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0236-4. Epub 2013 May 12.
5
CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future.冠状动脉支架的CT成像:过去、现在与未来
ISRN Cardiol. 2012;2012:139823. doi: 10.5402/2012/139823. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
64层计算机断层扫描对冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性:与有创冠状动脉造影的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 6;49(9):951-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.065. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
4
Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience.冠状动脉支架通畅性及支架内再狭窄:采用64层多排探测器CT冠状动脉造影进行判定——初步经验
Radiology. 2007 Feb;242(2):403-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2422060065.
5
Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2--asking answerable questions and searching for evidence.循证放射学:步骤1和2——提出可回答的问题并寻找证据。
Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):23-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2421052135.
6
Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography.使用64层计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架通畅性和再狭窄。
Acad Radiol. 2006 Dec;13(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.044.
7
Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).使用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)评估冠状动脉近端支架内再狭窄。
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):1452-63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0510-0. Epub 2006 Nov 18.
8
Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography.64层多排螺旋计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架再狭窄
Eur Heart J. 2006 Nov;27(21):2567-72. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl303. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
9
Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.多层螺旋计算机断层扫描用于评估左主干冠状动脉支架置入术后支架通畅情况:与传统冠状动脉造影和血管内超声的比较
Circulation. 2006 Aug 15;114(7):645-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.608950. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries.16层多排螺旋CT检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄与检测非支架置入冠状动脉狭窄的诊断准确性
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0291-5. Epub 2006 May 30.