• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

16层多排螺旋CT检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄与检测非支架置入冠状动脉狭窄的诊断准确性

Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries.

作者信息

Kefer Joelle M, Coche Emmanuel, Vanoverschelde Jean-Louis J, Gerber Bernhard L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc UCL, Av Hippocrate 10/2806, Woluwe St. Lambert, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0291-5. Epub 2006 May 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-006-0291-5
PMID:16733682
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for detecting in-stent restenosis. Fifty patients with 69 previously implanted coronary stents underwent 16-slice MDCT before quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for detection of in-stent restenosis defined as >50% lumen diameter stenosis (DS) in stented and nonstented coronary segments >1.5-mm diameter was computed using QCA as reference. According to QCA, 18/69 (25%) stented segments had restenosis. In addition, 33/518 (6.4%) nonstented segments had >50% DS. In-stent restenosis was correctly identified on MDCT images in 12/18 stents, and absence of restenosis was correctly identified in 50/51 stents. Stenosis in native coronary arteries was correctly identified in 22/33 segments and correctly excluded in 482/485 segments. Thus, sensitivity (67% vs 67% p=1.0), specificity (98% vs 99%, p=0.96) and overall diagnostic accuracy (90% vs 97%, p=0.68) was similarly high for detecting in-stent restenosis as for detecting stenosis in nonstented coronary segments. MDCT has similarly high diagnostic accuracy for detecting in-stent restenosis as for detecting coronary artery disease in nonstented segments. This suggests that MDCT could be clinically useful for identification of restenosis in patients after coronary stenting.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估16层多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)检测支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性。50例患者共69个先前植入的冠状动脉支架在定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)前接受了16层MDCT检查。以QCA为参考,计算MDCT检测支架内再狭窄(定义为支架内及直径>1.5mm的非支架冠状动脉节段管腔直径狭窄(DS)>50%)的诊断准确性。根据QCA,18/69(25%)个支架节段存在再狭窄。此外,33/518(6.4%)个非支架节段的DS>50%。12/18个支架的支架内再狭窄在MDCT图像上被正确识别,50/51个支架的再狭窄未被正确识别。22/33个节段的天然冠状动脉狭窄被正确识别,482/485个节段的狭窄被正确排除。因此,检测支架内再狭窄与检测非支架冠状动脉节段狭窄的敏感性(67%对67%,p=1.0)、特异性(98%对99%,p=0.96)和总体诊断准确性(90%对97%,p=0.68)同样高。MDCT检测支架内再狭窄与检测非支架节段冠状动脉疾病的诊断准确性同样高。这表明MDCT在临床上可用于识别冠状动脉支架置入术后患者的再狭窄。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries.16层多排螺旋CT检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄与检测非支架置入冠状动脉狭窄的诊断准确性
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):87-96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0291-5. Epub 2006 May 30.
2
Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).使用多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)评估冠状动脉近端支架内再狭窄。
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):1452-63. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0510-0. Epub 2006 Nov 18.
3
Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography.64层多排螺旋计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架再狭窄
Eur Heart J. 2006 Nov;27(21):2567-72. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl303. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
4
Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients.三维导航门控磁共振成像与16层计算机断层扫描在检测患者冠状动脉狭窄中的头对头比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.057.
5
Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.64层螺旋计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影术、有创冠状动脉造影术及血管内超声评估支架内再狭窄的可行性及诊断准确性比较
Am J Cardiol. 2009 May 15;103(10):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.343. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
6
[Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography compared with coronary angiography].[64层计算机断层扫描与冠状动脉造影术相比的诊断准确性]
Laeknabladid. 2008 Mar;94(3):199-205.
7
Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography.使用64层计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架通畅性和再狭窄。
Acad Radiol. 2006 Dec;13(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.044.
8
Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography.多层螺旋计算机断层扫描诊断冠状动脉支架内再狭窄
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1573-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.049. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography.64层螺旋CT血管造影术检测椎动脉开口支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性:与传统血管造影术的比较
Acta Radiol. 2014 Oct;55(8):1000-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113507922. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.320 排多层螺旋 CT 冠状动脉成像无创评估支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性。
Invest Radiol. 2010 Jun;45(6):331-40. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181dfa312.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of 16-slice computed tomography with conventional angiography to evaluate coronary artery stent patency.16层计算机断层扫描与传统血管造影术评估冠状动脉支架通畅性的比较。
Eurasian J Med. 2009 Apr;41(1):4-9.
2
Recent improvement in coronary computed tomography angiography diagnostic accuracy.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影诊断准确性的近期改善。
Clin Cardiol. 2014 Jul;37(7):428-33. doi: 10.1002/clc.22286. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
3
CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future.冠状动脉支架的CT成像:过去、现在与未来

本文引用的文献

1
64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.64层多探测器冠状动脉CT血管造影术:68种不同支架的体外评估
Eur Radiol. 2006 Apr;16(4):818-26. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0062-8. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
2
High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography.接受诊断性传统冠状动脉造影检查的患者的高分辨率螺旋计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影。
Circulation. 2005 Oct 11;112(15):2318-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.533471. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
3
Incremental cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents compared with a third-generation bare-metal stent in a real-world setting: randomised Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial (BASKET).
ISRN Cardiol. 2012;2012:139823. doi: 10.5402/2012/139823. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
4
In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound.64 层多排螺旋 CT 冠状动脉造影显示支架内面积狭窄:支架最小管腔横截面积的最佳截断值与血管内超声比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28 Suppl 1:21-31. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0057-x. Epub 2012 May 6.
5
[Imaging of coronary stents using multislice computed tomography].[使用多层螺旋计算机断层扫描对冠状动脉支架进行成像]
Radiologe. 2010 Jun;50(6):507-13. doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-1990-0.
6
Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: are we really making progress?从16层螺旋CT过渡到64层螺旋CT用于评估冠状动脉疾病:我们真的取得进展了吗?
Can J Cardiol. 2009 Sep;25(9):533-42. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70144-8.
7
Evaluation of right ventricular function with multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability.多排螺旋计算机断层扫描评估右心室功能:与磁共振成像的比较及观察者间和观察者内变异性分析
Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):278-89. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1146-z. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
8
Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance.多排螺旋计算机断层血管造影术评估支架内再狭窄:诊断性能的荟萃分析
BMC Med Imaging. 2008 Jul 31;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-8-14.
9
Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography.回顾性心电图门控64层CT血管造影对冠状动脉支架通畅性的无创评估
Eur Radiol. 2008 Feb;18(2):234-43. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0756-1. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.多层螺旋计算机断层扫描检测冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2008 Feb;18(2):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0743-6. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
在真实临床环境中药物洗脱支架与第三代裸金属支架相比的增量成本效益:随机巴塞尔支架成本效益试验(BASKET)
Lancet. 2005;366(9489):921-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67221-2.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography.使用64层螺旋计算机断层扫描进行无创冠状动脉造影的诊断准确性
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):552-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056.
5
Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound.64层计算机断层扫描对阻塞性和非阻塞性冠状动脉病变的定量分析:与定量冠状动脉造影和血管内超声的对比研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.071.
6
Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients.三维导航门控磁共振成像与16层计算机断层扫描在检测患者冠状动脉狭窄中的头对头比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.057.
7
New diagnostic technique in multi-slice computed tomography for in-stent restenosis: pixel count method.多层螺旋CT诊断支架内再狭窄的新方法:像素计数法
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 4;108(2):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.05.013. Epub 2005 Jun 27.
8
Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience.
Radiol Med. 2005 May-Jun;109(5-6):500-7.
9
Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.具有188毫秒时间分辨率的16层螺旋计算机断层扫描非侵入性冠状动脉成像的图像质量和诊断准确性
Heart. 2005 Jul;91(7):938-41. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.044735.
10
Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation.使用具有16×0.75准直和375毫秒旋转的多探测器CT检测冠状动脉狭窄。
Eur Heart J. 2005 Oct;26(19):1978-86. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi326. Epub 2005 May 27.