Cleland John, Freemantle Nick, Ghio Stefano, Fruhwald Friedrich, Shankar Aparna, Marijanowski Monique, Verboven Yves, Tavazzi Luigi
Department of Cardiology, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Aug 5;52(6):438-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.036.
This study was designed to investigate whether selected baseline variables and early response markers predict the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on long-term mortality.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with moderate or severe heart failure and markers of cardiac dyssynchrony, but not all patients respond to a similar extent.
In the CARE-HF (Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure) study, 813 patients with heart failure and markers of cardiac dyssynchrony were randomly assigned to receive or not receive CRT in addition to pharmacological treatment and were followed for a median of 37.6 months. A model including assigned treatment, 15 pre-specified baseline variables, and 8 markers of response at 3 months was constructed to predict all-cause mortality.
On multivariable analysis, plasma concentration of amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (univariate and multivariable model chi-square test: 105.0 and 48.4; both p < 0.0001) and severity of mitral regurgitation (chi-square test: 44.0 and 17.9; both p < 0.0001) at 3 months, regardless of assigned treatment, were the strongest predictors of mortality. Ischemic heart disease as the cause of ventricular dysfunction (chi-square test: 34.9 and 7.4; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0066), being in New York Heart Association functional class IV (chi-square test: 18.8 and 9.6; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0020), or having less interventricular mechanical delay (chi-square test: 29.8 and 8.8; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0029) at baseline all predicted a worse outcome. However, the reduction in mortality in patients assigned to CRT was similar before (hazard ratio: 0.602; 95% confidence interval: 0.468 to 0.774) and after (hazard ratio: 0.679; 95% confidence interval: 0.494 to 0.914) adjustment for variables measured at baseline and at 3 months.
Patients who have more severe mitral regurgitation or persistently elevated amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide despite treatment for heart failure, including CRT, have a higher mortality. However, patients assigned to CRT had a lower mortality even after adjusting for variables measured before and 3 months after intervention. The effect of CRT on mortality cannot be usefully predicted using such information. (CARE-HF CArdiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure; NCT00170300).
本研究旨在调查选定的基线变量和早期反应标志物是否能预测心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对长期死亡率的影响。
心脏再同步治疗可降低中重度心力衰竭和心脏不同步标志物患者的长期发病率和死亡率,但并非所有患者的反应程度相似。
在心力衰竭心脏再同步治疗(CARE-HF)研究中,813例患有心力衰竭和心脏不同步标志物的患者被随机分配接受或不接受除药物治疗外的CRT,并随访了37.6个月的中位数时间。构建了一个包括指定治疗、15个预先指定的基线变量和3个月时的8个反应标志物的模型来预测全因死亡率。
在多变量分析中,无论指定治疗如何,3个月时氨基末端脑钠肽前体的血浆浓度(单变量和多变量模型卡方检验:105.0和48.4;均p<0.0001)和二尖瓣反流的严重程度(卡方检验:44.0和17.9;均p<0.0001)是死亡率的最强预测因子。作为心室功能障碍原因的缺血性心脏病(卡方检验:34.9和7.4;p<0.0001和p = 0.0066)、纽约心脏协会功能分级为IV级(卡方检验:18.8和9.6;p<0.0001和p = 0.0020)或基线时心室间机械延迟较小(卡方检验:29.8和8.8;p<0.0001和p = 0.0029)均预测预后较差。然而,在对基线和3个月时测量的变量进行调整之前(风险比:0.602;95%置信区间:0.468至0.774)和之后(风险比:0.679;95%置信区间:0.494至0.914),分配接受CRT的患者死亡率的降低相似。
二尖瓣反流更严重或尽管接受了包括CRT在内的心力衰竭治疗但氨基末端脑钠肽前体持续升高的患者死亡率更高。然而,即使在对干预前和干预后3个月测量的变量进行调整后,分配接受CRT的患者死亡率仍较低。使用此类信息无法有效预测CRT对死亡率的影响。(CARE-HF心力衰竭心脏再同步治疗;NCT00170300)