Department of Orthodontics, The Health Science Center, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Arch Oral Biol. 2009 Dec;54 Suppl 1:S107-17. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
Due to instrument imprecision and human inconsistencies, measurements are not free of error. Technical error of measurement (TEM) is the variability encountered between dimensions when the same specimens are measured at multiple sessions. A goal of a data collection regimen is to minimise TEM. The few studies that actually quantify TEM, regardless of discipline, report that it is substantial and can affect results and inferences. This paper reviews some statistical approaches for identifying and controlling TEM. Statistically, TEM is part of the residual ('unexplained') variance in a statistical test, so accounting for TEM, which requires repeated measurements, enhances the chances of finding a statistically significant difference if one exists.
The aim of this paper was to review and discuss common statistical designs relating to types of error and statistical approaches to error accountability. This paper addresses issues of landmark location, validity, technical and systematic error, analysis of variance, scaled measures and correlation coefficients in order to guide the reader towards correct identification of true experimental differences.
Researchers commonly infer characteristics about populations from comparatively restricted study samples. Most inferences are statistical and, aside from concerns about adequate accounting for known sources of variation with the research design, an important source of variability is measurement error. Variability in locating landmarks that define variables is obvious in odontometrics, cephalometrics and anthropometry, but the same concerns about measurement accuracy and precision extend to all disciplines. With increasing accessibility to computer-assisted methods of data collection, the ease of incorporating repeated measures into statistical designs has improved. Accounting for this technical source of variation increases the chance of finding biologically true differences when they exist.
由于仪器不精确和人为不一致,测量并非没有误差。测量技术误差(TEM)是指在多次测量同一标本时遇到的尺寸之间的可变性。数据收集方案的目标是尽量减少 TEM。少数实际上量化 TEM 的研究,无论学科如何,都报告说 TEM 很大,会影响结果和推论。本文回顾了一些用于识别和控制 TEM 的统计方法。从统计学上讲,TEM 是统计检验中剩余(“未解释”)方差的一部分,因此,考虑到 TEM 需要重复测量,这增加了如果存在统计学上显著差异的可能性。
本文的目的是回顾和讨论与误差类型和误差责任的统计方法相关的常见统计设计。本文讨论了地标定位、有效性、技术和系统误差、方差分析、比例测量和相关系数等问题,以指导读者正确识别真正的实验差异。
研究人员通常从相对有限的研究样本中推断出关于人群的特征。大多数推论都是统计学上的,除了对研究设计中已知变异源的充分考虑外,一个重要的变异源是测量误差。在牙测量学、头测量学和人体测量学中,定义变量的地标定位的变异性是显而易见的,但同样的关于测量精度和精密度的关注也适用于所有学科。随着计算机辅助数据收集方法的普及,将重复测量纳入统计设计变得更加容易。考虑到这种技术误差源,当存在生物学真实差异时,更容易发现它们。