• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

事件发生后的信息会在一年后影响儿童的自传体记忆。

Post-event information affects children's autobiographical memory after one year.

作者信息

London Kamala, Bruck Maggie, Melnyk Laura

机构信息

Department of Psychology/MS948, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2009 Aug;33(4):344-55. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9147-7. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10979-008-9147-7
PMID:18679779
Abstract

In two experiments, we examined whether post-event information (PEI) about true and false events persisted in children's reports after approximately 1 year. In Experiment 1, 4- to 6-year-olds were given PEI and then were given memory tests 2 weeks and 15 months later. Although PEI appeared in free recall at the initial testing, it decreased substantially by the long-term test. In contrast, on recognition tasks the children showed facilitation and misinformation effects at initial and follow-up tests. Experiment 2 replicated lasting misinformation and facilitation effects in recognition memory among 4- to 9-year-olds who were tested after 1-week and 10-month delays. We conclude that true and false reminders about an experienced event continue to affect children's memory approximately 1 year later.

摘要

在两项实验中,我们研究了关于真实和虚假事件的事后信息(PEI)在大约一年后是否会持续存在于儿童的报告中。在实验1中,4至6岁的儿童被给予事后信息,然后在2周和15个月后接受记忆测试。尽管事后信息在初次测试的自由回忆中出现,但在长期测试中大幅减少。相比之下,在识别任务中,儿童在初次和后续测试中均表现出促进和错误信息效应。实验2在1周和10个月延迟后接受测试的4至9岁儿童中重复了识别记忆中持续存在的错误信息和促进效应。我们得出结论,关于经历过的事件的真实和虚假提示在大约一年后仍会继续影响儿童的记忆。

相似文献

1
Post-event information affects children's autobiographical memory after one year.事件发生后的信息会在一年后影响儿童的自传体记忆。
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Aug;33(4):344-55. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9147-7. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
2
Does the nature of the experience influence suggestibility? A study of children's event memory.经历的性质会影响易受暗示性吗?一项关于儿童事件记忆的研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Apr;81(4):502-30. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2002.2662.
3
Parameters of remembering and forgetting in the transition from infancy to early childhood.从婴儿期到幼儿期过渡阶段的记忆与遗忘参数。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2000;65(4):i-vi, 1-204.
4
The roles of prior experience and the timing of misinformation presentation on young children's event memories.先前经验以及错误信息呈现时机对幼儿事件记忆的影响
Child Dev. 2007 Jul-Aug;78(4):1137-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01057.x.
5
A temporal discriminability account of children's eyewitness suggestibility.儿童目击证人易受暗示性的时间辨别力解释
Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):647-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00811.x.
6
When initial interviews are delayed a year: effect on children's 2-year recall.当初次访谈推迟一年时:对儿童两年后回忆的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2005 Oct;29(5):527-41. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-6833-6.
7
Children's and adults' spontaneous false memories: long-term persistence and mere-testing effects.儿童和成人的自发错误记忆:长期持续性和单纯测试效应。
Child Dev. 1998 Oct;69(5):1361-77.
8
The consistency of false suggestions moderates children's reports of a single instance of a repeated event: predicting increases and decreases in suggestibility.错误暗示的一致性会调节儿童对重复事件单个实例的报告:预测易受暗示性的增加和减少。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 May;94(1):68-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
9
What the stories children tell can tell about their memory: narrative skill and young children's suggestibility.儿童讲述的故事能揭示他们的记忆:叙事技巧与幼儿的易受暗示性。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1442-56. doi: 10.1037/a0012849.
10
The strategic regulation of children's memory performance and suggestibility.儿童记忆表现和易受暗示性的策略性调控。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 May;91(1):24-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Resulting from Road Traffic Accidents (RTA): A Systematic Literature Review.道路交通事故所致创伤后应激障碍:一项系统文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 23;22(7):985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22070985.
2
Unringing the bell: Successful debriefing following a rich false memory study.敲响的钟声无法召回:一项丰富的虚假记忆研究后的成功汇报。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jul;52(5):1079-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01524-9. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Normative developmental vs. reverse developmental trends in memory distortion: a framework to investigate the impact of internal and external influences on memory and their relevance to legal decisions.
记忆扭曲中的规范性发展与逆向发展趋势:一个用于研究内部和外部影响对记忆的作用及其与法律决策相关性的框架。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1232753. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232753. eCollection 2023.
4
Effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview and Drawing Pictures for Eliciting Eyewitness Memories.自我访谈和绘图法在唤起目击证人记忆方面的有效性。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Dec 12;24(5):643-654. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1254587. eCollection 2017.