• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生对老年患者胰岛素处方的处理方式:一项定性研究。

GPs' approach to insulin prescribing in older patients: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Agarwal Gina, Nair Kalpana, Cosby Jarold, Dolovich Lisa, Levine Mitchell, Kaczorowski Janusz, Butler Chris, Burns Sheri

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, St Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Aug;58(553):569-75. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319639.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp08X319639
PMID:18682013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2566521/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that insulin is under-prescribed in older people. Some reasons for this include physician's concerns about potential side-effects or patients' resistance to insulin. In general, however, little is known about how GPs make decisions related to insulin prescribing in older people.

AIM

To explore the process and rationale for prescribing decisions of GPs when treating older patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Qualitative individual interviews using a grounded theory approach.

SETTING

Primary care.

METHOD

A thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes that reflected factors that influence the prescribing of insulin.

RESULTS

Twenty-one GPs in active practice in Ontario completed interviews. Seven factors influencing the prescribing of insulin for older patients were identified: GPs' beliefs about older people; GPs' beliefs about diabetes and its management; gauging the intensity of therapy required; need for preparation for insulin therapy; presence of support from informal or formal healthcare provider; frustration with management complexity; and GPs' experience with insulin administration. Although GPs indicated that they would prescribe insulin allowing for the above factors, there was a mismatch in intended approach to prescribing and self-reported prescribing.

CONCLUSION

GPs' rationale for prescribing (or not prescribing) insulin is mediated by both practitioner-related and patient-related factors. GPs intended and actual prescribing varied depending on their assessment of each patient's situation. In order to improve prescribing for increasing numbers of older people with type 2 diabetes, more education for GPs, specialist support, and use of allied health professionals is needed.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,老年人中胰岛素的处方量不足。造成这种情况的一些原因包括医生对潜在副作用的担忧或患者对胰岛素的抵触。然而,总体而言,对于全科医生如何做出与老年人胰岛素处方相关的决策知之甚少。

目的

探讨全科医生在治疗老年2型糖尿病患者时处方决策的过程和依据。

研究设计

采用扎根理论方法进行定性个体访谈。

研究地点

初级保健机构。

方法

进行主题分析,以确定反映影响胰岛素处方因素的主题。

结果

安大略省21名在职全科医生完成了访谈。确定了影响老年患者胰岛素处方的七个因素:全科医生对老年人的看法;全科医生对糖尿病及其管理的看法;评估所需治疗强度;胰岛素治疗准备的必要性;有无来自非正式或正式医疗服务提供者的支持;对管理复杂性的无奈;以及全科医生胰岛素给药的经验。尽管全科医生表示会考虑上述因素来开具胰岛素处方,但在预期的处方方法和自我报告的处方之间存在差异。

结论

全科医生开具(或不开具)胰岛素处方的依据受从业者相关因素和患者相关因素的共同影响。全科医生预期的和实际的处方因他们对每个患者情况的评估而异。为了改善越来越多老年2型糖尿病患者的处方情况,需要对全科医生进行更多教育、提供专科支持并利用专职医疗人员。

相似文献

1
GPs' approach to insulin prescribing in older patients: a qualitative study.全科医生对老年患者胰岛素处方的处理方式:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Aug;58(553):569-75. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319639.
2
Socially responsible antibiotic choices in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' decisions to prescribe broad-spectrum and fluroquinolone antibiotics.基层医疗中具有社会责任感的抗生素选择:对全科医生开具广谱和氟喹诺酮类抗生素决策的定性研究
Fam Pract. 2007 Oct;24(5):427-34. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm040. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
3
Telephone prescribing of antibiotics. General practitioners' views and reflections.抗生素的电话处方。全科医生的观点与思考。
Eur J Public Health. 2001 Sep;11(3):260-3. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/11.3.260.
4
GPs' decisions about prescribing end-of-life anticipatory medications: a qualitative study.全科医生对临终前预开医嘱的决策:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Oct 1;70(699):e731-e739. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712625. Print 2020 Oct.
5
Professional experience guides opioid prescribing for chronic joint pain in primary care.专业经验指导初级保健中慢性关节痛的阿片类药物处方。
Fam Pract. 2011 Feb;28(1):102-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq083. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
6
Reasons of general practitioners for not prescribing lipid-lowering medication to patients with diabetes: a qualitative study.全科医生不给糖尿病患者开降脂药物的原因:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Apr 21;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-24.
7
The prescribing of specialist medicines: what factors influence GPs' decision making?专科药物的处方:哪些因素会影响全科医生的决策?
Fam Pract. 2009 Aug;26(4):301-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp030. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
8
Attitudes, norms and controls influencing lifestyle risk factor management in general practice.影响全科医疗中生活方式风险因素管理的态度、规范和控制措施。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Aug 26;10:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-59.
9
Factors affecting feasibility and acceptability of a practice-based educational intervention to support evidence-based prescribing: a qualitative study.影响基于实践的教育干预以支持循证处方的可行性和可接受性的因素:一项定性研究
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):661-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh614. Epub 2004 Nov 4.
10
GPs' perceptions of patient influence on prescribing.全科医生对患者在处方开具方面影响力的看法。
Fam Pract. 1999 Jun;16(3):255-61. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.3.255.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision making and patient-centeredness for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care-results of the cluster-randomised controlled DEBATE trial.在初级保健中,针对血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的共同决策和以患者为中心-DEBATE 试验的集群随机对照结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 May 15;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01436-6.
2
Psychosocial information use for clinical decisions in diabetes care.糖尿病护理中临床决策的社会心理信息使用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):813-824. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz053.
3
How general practitioners decide on maxims of action in response to demands from conflicting sets of norms: a grounded theory study.全科医生如何根据来自相互冲突的规范集的要求决定行动准则:一项扎根理论研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 14;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0360-3.
4
Changes in Medication Use After Dementia Diagnosis in an Observational Cohort of Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病患者观察性队列中痴呆症诊断后用药情况的变化
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jan;65(1):77-82. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14429. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review.基层医疗中2型糖尿病有效管理的障碍:定性系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Feb;66(643):e114-27. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683509.
6
Type 2 diabetes patients' and providers' differing perspectives on medication nonadherence: a qualitative meta-synthesis.2型糖尿病患者与医疗服务提供者对药物治疗不依从的不同观点:一项定性元分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 23;15:516. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1174-8.
7
Doctors' perspectives on the barriers to appropriate prescribing in older hospitalized patients: a qualitative study.医生对老年住院患者合理用药障碍的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May;79(5):860-9. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12555.
8
A meta-synthesis of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients.老年患者潜在不适当处方的元综合分析。
Drugs Aging. 2014 Aug;31(8):631-8. doi: 10.1007/s40266-014-0190-4.
9
Perspectives and experiences of health care professionals and patients regarding treatments for type 2 diabetes.医疗保健专业人员和患者对2型糖尿病治疗的看法与经历。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014 Jan;147(1):45-54. doi: 10.1177/1715163513506547.
10
Choice of therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and a sulphonylurea: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis.二甲双胍和磺脲类药物治疗血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的治疗选择:一项系统评价和混合治疗比较的荟萃分析
Open Med. 2012 Jun 4;6(2):e62-74. Print 2012.

本文引用的文献

1
Implications of the United kingdom prospective diabetes study.英国前瞻性糖尿病研究的启示
Diabetes Care. 2003 Jan;26 Suppl 1:S28-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s28.
2
Evaluation of alternative strategies for optimizing glycemia: progress to date.优化血糖的替代策略评估:迄今进展
Am J Med. 2002 Oct 28;113 Suppl 6A:23S-35S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01278-0.
3
The underuse of insulin therapy in North America.胰岛素疗法在北美的使用不足。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002 Sep-Oct;18 Suppl 3:S42-9. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.277.
4
Diabetes in the elderly: problems of care and service provision.老年糖尿病:护理与服务提供问题
Diabet Med. 2002 Jul;19 Suppl 4:66-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.19.s4.12.x.
5
Poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: a conspiracy of disease, suboptimal therapy and attitude.2型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳:疾病、治疗欠佳与态度的共同影响
QJM. 2000 Jun;93(6):369-74. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/93.6.369.
6
Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients.熊本2型糖尿病患者最佳血糖控制研究的长期结果
Diabetes Care. 2000 Apr;23 Suppl 2:B21-9.
7
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.磺脲类或胰岛素强化血糖控制与传统治疗及2型糖尿病患者并发症风险的比较(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究[UKPDS 33])。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)小组
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
8
Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections.1995 - 2025年全球糖尿病负担:患病率、数值估计及预测
Diabetes Care. 1998 Sep;21(9):1414-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1414.
9
United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 24: a 6-year, randomized, controlled trial comparing sulfonylurea, insulin, and metformin therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that could not be controlled with diet therapy. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group.英国前瞻性糖尿病研究24:一项为期6年的随机对照试验,比较磺脲类药物、胰岛素和二甲双胍疗法对新诊断的、饮食疗法无法控制的2型糖尿病患者的疗效。英国前瞻性糖尿病研究小组。
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Feb 1;128(3):165-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-3-199802010-00001.
10
Beliefs and attitudes of persons with diabetes.糖尿病患者的信念与态度。
Fam Med. 1995 Apr;27(4):267-71.