Shon Won Yong, Gupta Siddhartha, Biswal Sandeep, Hur Chang Yong, Jajodia Nirmal, Hong Suk Joo, Myung Jae Sung
Department of Orthopedics, Korea University College of Medicine, Guro Hospital, # 80, Guro-Dong, Guro-Gu, Seoul, 152-703, South Korea.
Skeletal Radiol. 2008 Dec;37(12):1119-27. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0550-4. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
Orientation of acetabular component, influenced by pelvic tilt, body position, and individual variations affects the outcome following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently available methods of evaluation are either imprecise or require advanced image processing. We analyzed intersubject and intrasubject variability of pelvic tilt, measured by sagittal sacral tilt (ST) and its relationship with acetabular component tilt (AT) by using a simple method based on standard radiographs.
ST was measured on lateral radiographs of pelvis including lumbosacral spine obtained in supine, sitting, standing, and lateral decubitus position for 40 asymptomatic THA patients and compared to computed tomography (CT) data obtained in supine position. AT was measured on lateral radiographs (measured acetabular tilt: MAT) in each position and compared to measurement of AT on CT and an indirectly calculated AT (CAT).
Mean ST changed from supine to sitting, standing, and lateral decubitus positions as follows: 26.5 +/- 15.5 degrees (range 4.6-73.4 degrees ), 8.4 +/- 6.2 degrees (range 0.6-24.5 degrees ), and 13.4 +/- 8.4 degrees (range 0.1-24.2 degrees ; p < 0.0001, p = 0.002, p = 0.006). The MAT on radiographs was not significantly different from the MAT measured on CT (p = 0.002) and the CAT (p = 0.06). There is a good correlation between change in ST and MAT in sagittal plane (r = 0.93).
Measurement of ST on radiographs is a simple and reliable method to track changes in pelvic tilt in different body positions. There is significant intersubject and intrasubject variation of ST and MAT with postural changes and it may explain causes of impingement or instability following THA, which could not be previously explained.
髋臼组件的定位受骨盆倾斜、身体位置和个体差异影响,会影响全髋关节置换术(THA)的结果。目前可用的评估方法要么不精确,要么需要先进的图像处理技术。我们通过一种基于标准X线片的简单方法,分析了矢状骶骨倾斜度(ST)测量的骨盆倾斜度的个体间和个体内变异性,及其与髋臼组件倾斜度(AT)的关系。
对40例无症状THA患者在仰卧位、坐位、站立位和侧卧位时包括腰骶椎的骨盆侧位X线片上测量ST,并与仰卧位时获得的计算机断层扫描(CT)数据进行比较。在每个位置的侧位X线片上测量AT(测量髋臼倾斜度:MAT),并与CT上的AT测量值和间接计算的AT(CAT)进行比较。
从仰卧位到坐位、站立位和侧卧位,平均ST变化如下:26.5±15.5度(范围4.6 - 73.4度),8.4±6.2度(范围0.6 - 24.5度),13.4±8.4度(范围0.1 - 24.2度;p < 0.0001,p = 0.002,p = 0.006)。X线片上的MAT与CT上测量的MAT(p = 0.002)和CAT(p = 0.06)无显著差异。矢状面ST变化与MAT之间存在良好的相关性(r = 0.93)。
在X线片上测量ST是一种简单可靠的方法,可追踪不同身体位置时骨盆倾斜度的变化。ST和MAT随体位变化存在显著的个体间和个体内变异,这可能解释了THA后撞击或不稳定的原因,而这些原因以前无法解释。