University College London Hospital, London, UK.
The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1280-1288. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2018-0134.R1.
This study aims to: determine the difference in pelvic position that occurs between surgery and radiographic, supine, postoperative assessment; examine how the difference in pelvic position influences subsequent component orientation; and establish whether differences in pelvic position, and thereafter component orientation, exist between total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in the supine versus the lateral decubitus positions.
The intra- and postoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 321 THAs were included; 167 were performed with the patient supine using the anterior approach and 154 were performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus using the posterior approach. The inclination and anteversion of the acetabular component was measured and the difference (Δ) between the intra- and postoperative radiographs was determined. The target zone was inclination/anteversion of 40°/20° (± 10°). Changes in the tilt, rotation, and obliquity of the pelvis on the intra- and postoperative radiographs were calculated from Δinclination/anteversion using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm.
The mean postoperative inclination/anteversion was 40° (± 8°)/23° (± 9°) with Δinclination and/or Δanteversion > ± 10° in 74 (21%). Intraoperatively, the pelvis was anteriorly tilted by a mean of 4° (± 10°), internally rotated by a mean of 1° (± 10°) and adducted by a mean of 1° (± 5°). Having Δinclination and/or Δanteversion > ± 10° was associated with a 3.5 odds ratio of having the acetabular component outside the target zone. A greater proportion of THAs that were undertaken with the patient in the lateral decubitus position had Δinclination and/or Δanteversion > ± 10° (35.3%, 54/153) compared with those in the supine position (4.8%, 8/167; p < 0.001). A greater number of acetabular components were within the target zone in THAs undertaken with the patient in the supine position (72%, 120/167), compared with those in the lateral decubitus position (44%, 67/153; p < 0.001). Intraoperatively, the pelvis was more anteriorly tilted (p < 0.001) and more internally rotated (p = 0.04) when the patient was in the lateral decubitus position.
The pelvic position is more reliable when the patient is in the supine position, leading to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component. Significant differences in pelvic tilt and rotation are seen with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1280-8.
本研究旨在:确定手术与影像学仰卧位、术后评估之间骨盆位置的差异;研究骨盆位置的差异如何影响后续的部件方向;并确定在仰卧位与侧卧位施行的全髋关节置换术(THA)之间,骨盆位置以及随后的部件方向是否存在差异。
纳入了 321 例 THA 的术中及术后前后骨盆 X 线片;167 例患者采用前路仰卧位,154 例患者采用后路侧卧位。测量髋臼部件的倾斜度和前倾角,并确定术中与术后 X 线片之间的差异(Δ)。目标区域为 40°/20°(±10°)的倾斜度/前倾角。使用 Levenberg-Marquardt 算法,根据 Δ倾斜度/前倾角计算术中及术后 X 线片上骨盆倾斜度、旋转和倾斜度的变化。
术后平均倾斜度/前倾角为 40°(±8°)/23°(±9°),74 例(21%)的 Δ倾斜度和/或 Δ前倾角>±10°。术中骨盆平均前倾 4°(±10°),平均内旋 1°(±10°),平均内收 1°(±5°)。如果 Δ倾斜度和/或 Δ前倾角>±10°,髋臼部件位于目标区域外的可能性为 3.5 倍。与仰卧位相比,采用侧卧位的 THA 中,更多的患者存在 Δ倾斜度和/或 Δ前倾角>±10°(35.3%,54/153),而仰卧位的患者仅为 4.8%(8/167;p<0.001)。采用仰卧位的患者中,髋臼部件位于目标区域内的比例更高(72%,120/167),而采用侧卧位的患者为 44%(67/153;p<0.001)。术中,当患者处于侧卧位时,骨盆的前倾角度更大(p<0.001),内旋程度更大(p=0.04)。
当患者处于仰卧位时,骨盆位置更可靠,从而导致髋臼部件的方向更一致。当患者处于侧卧位时,骨盆倾斜和旋转存在明显差异。