Suppr超能文献

[老年急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术。我们的经验]

[Laparoscopic surgery for acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Our experience].

作者信息

Guerriero Olimpio, D'Amore Emilia, Di Meo Ermanno, Santagata Alfonso, Robbio Giovanni, De Paola Paolo, Guida Giovanni, Fiorillo Isabella

机构信息

UOC di Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Ospedale AGP di Piedimonte Matese (Caserta), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Caserta/1.

出版信息

Chir Ital. 2008 Mar-Apr;60(2):189-97.

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis in the elderly is a severe illness with high operative risks and mortality, which, even if less than in the past, is still too high. The surgical approach has significantly changed over the past 10 years: conservative therapy in the early 1990's was considered the only sure approach, while the laparoscopic surgical approach is recommended today for the emergency treatment of acute cholecystitis, also in the elderly. The aim of this retrospective study was to define the safety and effectiveness of early surgery for acute cholecystitis with the laparoscopic approach in the elderly. From September 2002 to September 2006, 287 patients were admitted to our unit for cholelithiasis, including 135 for acute cholecystitis. The patients with acute illness and age > 70 yrs numbered 73. After immediate monitoring of vital parameters and a brief diagnostic and therapeutic interval to restore the patient's general condition in intensive care (fasting, SNG, antibiotics, parenteral fluid therapy and analgesic drugs) all patients underwent emergency surgery within 24-96 hours. Fifty-nine (80.8%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, whereas the remaining 14 (19.2%) underwent open cholecystectomy due to their high-risk for cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic status (ASA III-IV). In group 1 treated laparoscopically, morbidity was 11.9% versus 35.7% in group 2 treated with open cholecystectomy (p < 0.001). Mortality was 0 in group 1; and 7% (1 patient) in group 2 (p < 0.05). The median hospital stay was 3.87 (2-9) days in group 1 vs 10.5 (8-29) days in group 2 (p < 0.001). The results of our study confirm the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in expert hands in the management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients. This choice allowed a statistically significant reduction in morbidity and overall hospital stay. Nevertheless, open cholecystectomy remains a valuable procedure for high-risk elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. Poor outcome is related to the almost constant presence of comorbidity in the elderly = ASA score (ASA II vs. IV: p < 0.001) and independent of the type of surgical intervention (laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystecotmy: p = n.s.). Early cholecystectomy in case of symptomatic cholelithiasis, before infectious complications set in, could partly reduce the poor prognosis in the elderly.

摘要

老年人急性胆囊炎是一种严重疾病,手术风险和死亡率很高,即便比过去有所降低,但仍然过高。在过去10年里,手术方式发生了显著变化:20世纪90年代初,保守治疗被认为是唯一可靠的方法,而如今,腹腔镜手术方式被推荐用于急性胆囊炎的急诊治疗,包括老年患者。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定采用腹腔镜手术方式对老年急性胆囊炎进行早期手术的安全性和有效性。2002年9月至2006年9月,287例因胆结石入住我院的患者中,135例为急性胆囊炎。年龄>70岁的急性病患者有73例。在对生命体征进行即时监测,并在重症监护病房进行短暂的诊断和治疗以恢复患者的一般状况(禁食、鼻胃管减压、抗生素、肠外补液治疗和镇痛药)后,所有患者在24 - 96小时内接受了急诊手术。59例(80.8%)接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术,其余14例(19.2%)因心血管、呼吸和代谢状况高危(ASA III - IV级)接受了开腹胆囊切除术。在腹腔镜治疗的第1组中,发病率为11.9%,而在开腹胆囊切除术治疗的第2组中为35.7%(p < 0.001)。第1组死亡率为0;第2组为7%(1例患者)(p < 0.05)。第1组的中位住院时间为3.87(2 - 9)天,第2组为10.5(8 - 29)天(p < 0.001)。我们的研究结果证实了在专家手中,腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年急性胆囊炎的安全性和有效性。这种选择在统计学上显著降低了发病率和总体住院时间。然而,对于接受急诊手术的高危老年患者,开腹胆囊切除术仍然是一种有价值的手术方式。不良预后与老年人几乎始终存在的合并症有关 = ASA评分(ASA II级与IV级:p < 0.001),且与手术干预类型无关(腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术:p = 无显著差异)。有症状胆结石患者在感染并发症发生之前进行早期胆囊切除术,可能部分降低老年人的不良预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验