Lisboa Thiago, Blot Stijn, Waterer Grant W, Canalis Emili, de Mendoza Diego, Rodriguez Alejandro, Rello Jordi
Critical Care Department, Joan XXIII University Hospital & University Rovira i Virgili, Ciber Enfermedades Respiratorias, Tarragona, Spain; Department of Infectious Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Faculty of Healthcare, Ghent University College, Ghent, Belgium.
Chest. 2009 Jan;135(1):165-172. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1216. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
It remains unknown whether bacteremia and rapid radiologic progression of pulmonary infiltrates increase the risk of shock and mortality in ICU patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The objective of this study was to investigate the relative importance of these two factors in the outcome of patients with severe CAP (sCAP).
A secondary analysis in a multicenter observational study was conducted in 457 patients with CAP admitted to the ICU. Patients were classified into four groups: group RB, rapid radiographic spread of pulmonary infiltrates and bacteremia (n = 48); group R, rapid radiographic spread but no bacteremia (n = 183); group B, bacteremia but without rapid radiographic spread (n = 39); and group C, neither rapid radiographic spread nor bacteremia (n = 187).
Logistic regression analysis showed that group RB and group R had a greater risk for shock than group C (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0 to 19.7; and aOR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.5 to 5.9; respectively), while patients in group B had no increased risk. In addition, compared to group C, group RB and group R had an increased risk of ICU death (aOR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 8.1; and aOR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.7 to 5.7, respectively), while patients in group B had none.
In this cohort of patients with severe CAP, radiologic progression of pulmonary infiltrates in the first 48 h is a significant adverse prognostic feature. In contrast, bacteremia does not affect outcomes.
在患有社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,菌血症和肺部浸润的快速影像学进展是否会增加休克和死亡风险仍不清楚。本研究的目的是调查这两个因素在重症CAP(sCAP)患者预后中的相对重要性。
对457例入住ICU的CAP患者进行了一项多中心观察性研究的二次分析。患者被分为四组:RB组,肺部浸润快速影像学扩散且有菌血症(n = 48);R组,肺部浸润快速影像学扩散但无菌血症(n = 183);B组,有菌血症但无肺部浸润快速影像学扩散(n = 39);C组,既无肺部浸润快速影像学扩散也无菌血症(n = 187)。
逻辑回归分析显示,RB组和R组发生休克的风险高于C组(调整后的优势比[aOR]分别为8.9;95%置信区间[CI]为4.0至19.7;以及aOR为3.8;95% CI为2.5至5.9),而B组患者的风险没有增加。此外,与C组相比,RB组和R组ICU死亡风险增加(aOR分别为3.4;95% CI为1.4至8.1;以及aOR为3.1;95% CI为1.7至5.7)),而B组患者没有增加。
在这一重症CAP患者队列中,最初48小时内肺部浸润的影像学进展是一个显著的不良预后特征。相比之下,菌血症不影响预后。