Department of Respiratory Medicine, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1115-0.
Antipseudomonal antibiotics should be restricted to patients at risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. However, the indications in different guidelines on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are discordant. Our objectives were to assess the prevalence of antipseudomonal antibiotic prescriptions and to identify determinants of empirical antibiotic choices in the emergency department.
Observational, retrospective, one-year cohort study in hospitalized adults with pneumonia. Antibiotic choices and clinical and demographic data were recorded on a standardized form. Antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity were classified into two groups: a) β-lactam antipseudomonals (β-APS), including carbapenems, piperacillin / tazobactam or cefepime (in monotherapy or combination) and b) monotherapy with antipseudomonal quinolones.
Data were recorded from 549 adults with pneumonia, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa being isolated in only nine (1.6%). Most (85%) prescriptions were compliant with SEPAR guidelines and 207 (37%) patients received antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity (14% β-APS and 23% levofloxacin). The use of β-APS was independently associated with ICU admission (OR 8.16 95% CI 3.69-18.06) and prior hospitalization (OR 6.76 95% CI 3.02-15.15), while levofloxacin was associated with negative pneumococcal urine antigen tests (OR 3.41 95% CI 1.70-6.85) but negatively associated with ICU admission (OR 0.26 95% CI 0.08-0.86). None of these factors were associated with P aeruginosa episodes. In univariate analysis, prior P aeruginosa infection/colonization (2/9 vs 6/372, p = 0.013), severe COPD (3/9 vs 26/372, p = 0.024), multilobar involvement (7/9 vs 119/372, p = 0.007) and prior antibiotic (6/9 vs 109/372, p = 0.025) were significantly associated with P aeruginosa episodes.
Antipseudomonal prescriptions were common, in spite of the very low incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The rationale for prescription was influenced by both severity-of-illness and pneumococcal urine antigen test (levofloxacin) and prior hospitalization and ICU admission (β-APS). However, these factors were not associated with P aeruginosa episodes. Only prior P aeruginosa infection/colonization and severe COPD seem to be reliable indicators in clinical practice.
抗假单胞菌抗生素应限于有假单胞菌感染风险的患者。然而,不同社区获得性肺炎(CAP)指南中的适应证并不一致。我们的目的是评估经验性抗生素选择中抗假单胞菌抗生素处方的流行率,并确定其决定因素。
对住院肺炎成年患者进行观察性、回顾性、为期一年的队列研究。在标准化表格上记录抗生素选择和临床及人口统计学数据。具有抗假单胞菌活性的抗生素分为两组:a)β-内酰胺类抗假单胞菌药物(β-APS),包括碳青霉烯类、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟(单药或联合使用)和 b)抗假单胞菌喹诺酮类单药治疗。
共记录了 549 例肺炎成人患者的数据,其中仅 9 例(1.6%)分离出铜绿假单胞菌。大多数(85%)处方符合 SEPAR 指南,207 例(37%)患者接受了具有抗假单胞菌活性的抗生素(14%β-APS 和 23%左氧氟沙星)。β-APS 的使用与 ICU 入院(OR 8.16,95%CI 3.69-18.06)和既往住院(OR 6.76,95%CI 3.02-15.15)独立相关,而左氧氟沙星与阴性肺炎球菌尿抗原检测(OR 3.41,95%CI 1.70-6.85)相关,但与 ICU 入院(OR 0.26,95%CI 0.08-0.86)呈负相关。这些因素均与铜绿假单胞菌感染无关。单因素分析显示,既往铜绿假单胞菌感染/定植(2/9 比 6/372,p=0.013)、严重 COPD(3/9 比 26/372,p=0.024)、多叶受累(7/9 比 119/372,p=0.007)和既往抗生素治疗(6/9 比 109/372,p=0.025)与铜绿假单胞菌感染显著相关。
尽管铜绿假单胞菌的发病率很低,但抗假单胞菌处方仍很常见。处方的合理性既受疾病严重程度的影响,也受肺炎球菌尿抗原检测(左氧氟沙星)和既往住院和 ICU 入院(β-APS)的影响。然而,这些因素与铜绿假单胞菌感染无关。只有既往铜绿假单胞菌感染/定植和严重 COPD 似乎是临床实践中的可靠指标。