Suppr超能文献

[哌替啶还是纳布啡用于产科镇痛?]

[Pethidine or nalbuphine for obstetric analgesia?].

作者信息

Mitterschiffthaler G, Huter O

机构信息

Univ.-Klinik für Anästhesie und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin Innsbruck.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991 May;51(5):362-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1026158.

Abstract

Because of the risk of ventilatory depression, agonistic and partially agonistic/antagonistic opiates are well suited for providing pain relief in obstetrics. We compared two groups of 20 women each with pregnancy on term who received equipotent doses of nalbuphin (0.1 mg/kg) and pethidin (0.8 mg/kg) intramuscularly. We found a significantly longer (6h) and better analgesic effect in the nalbuphin group but also a significantly more pronounced sedation. Other side effects were fewer in this last-named group. There were no differences in the behaviour of the babies between both groups. We consider that because of the "ceiling effect" of ventilatory depression, nalbuphin may allow better analgesia without the risk of ventilatory depression of both mother and newborn.

摘要

由于存在呼吸抑制的风险,激动性和部分激动性/拮抗性阿片类药物非常适合用于产科镇痛。我们比较了两组各20名足月妊娠妇女,她们分别肌肉注射等效剂量的纳布啡(0.1毫克/千克)和哌替啶(0.8毫克/千克)。我们发现纳布啡组的镇痛效果明显更长(6小时)且更好,但镇静作用也明显更显著。后一组的其他副作用较少。两组之间婴儿的行为没有差异。我们认为,由于呼吸抑制的“天花板效应”,纳布啡可能在不增加母亲和新生儿呼吸抑制风险的情况下提供更好的镇痛效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验