• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴茎癌当前TNM分类的不足之处:是时候做出改变了吗?

Shortcomings of the current TNM classification for penile carcinoma: time for a change?

作者信息

Leijte Joost A P, Horenblas Simon

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2009 Apr;27(2):151-4. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0308-6. Epub 2008 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-008-0308-6
PMID:18690458
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Accurate tumor staging is essential in the management of malignancies. It provides a guide in selecting accurate treatment and gives an indication of prognosis based on the extent of disease. The current TNM classification for penile carcinoma has remained unchanged since 1987. In this article, we focus on several deficiencies of the current classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis of the current literature regarding the current classification was done, focusing on known prognostic factors for survival. Furthermore, we discuss in detail the results from a recent analysis of more than 500 patients treated at our institute to evaluate the practical and prognostic value of the TNM-classification.

RESULTS

We found that, using the current classification system, accurate clinical staging is often difficult, because the T and N categories are defined by structures that are not easily identified using physical examination or imaging. Furthermore, the prognostic stratification of the present staging system is not optimal and there is a substantial overlap in disease-specific survival between several categories. We give an overview of modifications that could improve clinical staging and prognostic ability.

CONCLUSION

The current TNM classification for penile carcinoma has several shortcomings in terms of usability in clinical staging and prognostic value. With modifications clinical staging is facilitated, while the prognostic stratification of the classification is improved.

摘要

引言

准确的肿瘤分期对于恶性肿瘤的治疗至关重要。它为选择准确的治疗方法提供指导,并根据疾病范围提示预后情况。阴茎癌的现行TNM分类自1987年以来一直未变。在本文中,我们聚焦于现行分类的几个不足之处。

材料与方法

对有关现行分类的当前文献进行了分析,重点关注已知的生存预后因素。此外,我们详细讨论了对我院治疗的500多名患者的近期分析结果,以评估TNM分类的实用性和预后价值。

结果

我们发现,使用现行分类系统时,准确的临床分期往往很困难,因为T和N类别是由体格检查或影像学不易识别的结构定义的。此外,现行分期系统的预后分层并不理想,几个类别之间的疾病特异性生存率存在大量重叠。我们概述了可以改善临床分期和预后能力的修改方法。

结论

阴茎癌的现行TNM分类在临床分期的可用性和预后价值方面存在若干缺点。通过修改,临床分期变得更容易,同时分类的预后分层得到改善。

相似文献

1
Shortcomings of the current TNM classification for penile carcinoma: time for a change?阴茎癌当前TNM分类的不足之处:是时候做出改变了吗?
World J Urol. 2009 Apr;27(2):151-4. doi: 10.1007/s00345-008-0308-6. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
2
Evaluation of current TNM classification of penile carcinoma.阴茎癌现行TNM分类的评估。
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):933-8; discussion 938. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
3
A modified clinicopathological tumor staging system for survival prediction of patients with penile cancer.改良的阴茎癌患者生存预测临床病理肿瘤分期系统。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018 Nov 23;38(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0340-x.
4
Re: Evaluation of current TNM classification of penile carcinoma: J. A. Leijte, M. Gallee, N. Antonini and S. Horenblas J Urol 2008; 180: 933-938.回复:阴茎癌当前TNM分类的评估:J. A. 莱伊特、M. 加莱、N. 安东尼尼和S. 霍伦布拉斯,《泌尿外科杂志》2008年;180: 933 - 938。
J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1501-2; author reply 1502. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.046. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
5
Challenging the prognostic impact of the new WHO and TNM classifications with special emphasis on HPV status in penile carcinoma.挑战新 WHO 和 TNM 分类对阴茎癌预后的影响,特别强调 HPV 状态。
Virchows Arch. 2019 Aug;475(2):211-221. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02566-0. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Prognosis of the 8th TNM Staging System for Penile Cancer and Refinement of Prognostication by Incorporating High Risk Human Papillomavirus Status.第 8 版 TNM 分期系统在阴茎癌中的预后评估及结合高危型人乳头瘤病毒状态对预后的细化评估。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):562-569. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000584. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Clear-cell differentiation and lymphatic invasion, but not the revised TNM classification, predict lymph node metastases in pT1 penile cancer: a clinicopathologic study of 76 patients from a low incidence area.透明细胞分化和淋巴管浸润,但不是修订后的 TNM 分类,可预测低发地区 76 例 pT1 阴茎癌中的淋巴结转移:一项临床病理研究。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
8
External validation of the proposed T and N categories of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.阴茎鳞状细胞癌拟议的T和N分类的外部验证。
Int J Urol. 2011 Apr;18(4):312-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02722.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
9
What Is New in the Pathologic Staging of Penile Carcinoma in the 8th Edition of AJCC TNM Model: Rationale for Changes With Practical Stage-by-stage Category Diagnostic Considerations.第 8 版 AJCC TNM 模型中阴茎癌病理分期的新变化:变化的理由及分阶段类别诊断的实际考虑。
Adv Anat Pathol. 2021 Jul 1;28(4):209-227. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000297.
10
Subclassification of pN3 staging systems for penile cancer: Proposal for modification of the current TNM classification.阴茎癌pN3分期系统的亚分类:对当前TNM分类进行修改的建议。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Sep;35(9):543.e1-543.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic value of the 8th American Joint Committee on cancer anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer: A multicenter collaboration study.美国癌症联合委员会第8版阴茎癌解剖学和预后分期分组的预后价值:一项多中心合作研究。
Asian J Urol. 2025 Jan;12(1):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Outcomes of Prophylactic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Malignancies of Lower Limb.下肢恶性肿瘤预防性腹股沟淋巴结清扫的结果
Ann Afr Med. 2024 Oct 1;23(4):656-662. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_164_22. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3
Factors predictive of recurrence, metastasis and death in node-negative penile squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicentre cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of current TNM classification of penile carcinoma.阴茎癌现行TNM分类的评估。
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):933-8; discussion 938. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
2
Radical excision of the inguinal and iliac lymph glands; a study based upon 450 anatomical dissections and upon supportive clinical observations.腹股沟和髂淋巴结根治性切除术:基于450例解剖 dissections 及支持性临床观察的研究。 (这里“dissections”直译为“解剖”,结合语境可能是“解剖研究”之类更准确的表达,但按照要求未添加解释,保留原文形式)
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1948 Dec;87(6):679-94.
3
Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival.
阴茎鳞状细胞癌淋巴结阴性患者复发、转移及死亡的预测因素:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Mar;39(3):576-585. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20093. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
4
Low level of interobserver concordance in assessing histological subtype and tumor grade in patients with penile cancer may impair patient care.阴茎癌患者组织学亚型和肿瘤分级评估中观察者间一致性水平较低可能会损害患者护理。
Virchows Arch. 2022 Apr;480(4):879-886. doi: 10.1007/s00428-021-03249-5. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
Corpora Cavernos invasion vs. Corpus Spongiosum invasion in Penile Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阴茎癌中海绵体侵犯与尿道海绵体侵犯的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer. 2021 Jan 30;12(7):1960-1966. doi: 10.7150/jca.56504. eCollection 2021.
6
Proposal for reclassification of N staging system in penile cancer patients, based on number of positive lymph nodes.基于阳性淋巴结数量对阴茎癌患者N分期系统重新分类的提议。
Cancer Sci. 2018 Mar;109(3):764-770. doi: 10.1111/cas.13484. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
7
Modification of N staging systems for penile cancer: a more precise prediction of prognosis.阴茎癌N分期系统的修订:对预后更精确的预测
Br J Cancer. 2015 May 26;112(11):1766-71. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.141. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
Reproducibility of histopathologic tumor grading in penile cancer--results of a European project.阴茎癌组织病理学肿瘤分级的可重复性——一项欧洲项目的结果。
Virchows Arch. 2014 Apr;464(4):453-61. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1548-z. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
9
Penile cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.阴茎癌:肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 May 1;11(5):594-615. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0075.
10
Lymph node metastases and prognosis in penile cancer.阴茎癌中的淋巴结转移与预后。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2012 Jun;24(2):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s11670-012-0090-2.
阴茎癌的盆腔淋巴结清扫术:腹股沟淋巴结受累范围作为盆腔淋巴结受累及生存的指标
J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):947-52; discussion 952. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.060.
4
A prospective study of 100 cases of penile cancer managed according to European Association of Urology guidelines.一项根据欧洲泌尿外科学会指南对100例阴茎癌患者进行的前瞻性研究。
BJU Int. 2006 Sep;98(3):526-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06296.x.
5
Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis.阴茎淋巴结阳性癌的预后因素
J Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;93(2):133-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.20414.
6
EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer.欧洲泌尿外科学会阴茎癌指南。
Eur Urol. 2004 Jul;46(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.03.007.
7
Advanced penile carcinoma.晚期阴茎癌
J Urol. 2003 Aug;170(2 Pt 1):359-65. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000062829.43654.5e.
8
Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors and natural history in monocentric study with a conservative policy.阴茎鳞状细胞癌:单中心保守治疗策略下预后因素及自然史的多因素分析
Ann Oncol. 1997 Nov;8(11):1089-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1008248319036.
9
Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. III. Treatment of regional lymph nodes.阴茎鳞状细胞癌。III. 区域淋巴结的治疗
J Urol. 1993 Mar;149(3):492-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36126-8.
10
Correlation between the extent of nodal involvement and survival following groin dissection for carcinoma of the penis.阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后淋巴结受累范围与生存率的相关性。
Br J Urol. 1993 Nov;72(5 Pt 2):817-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16273.x.