Kern R S, Green M F, Fiske A P, Kee K S, Lee J, Sergi M J, Horan W P, Subotnik K L, Sugar C A, Nuechterlein K H
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA.
Psychol Med. 2009 Apr;39(4):645-54. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003966. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
Interpersonal communication problems are common among persons with schizophrenia and may be linked, in part, to deficits in theory of mind (ToM), the ability to accurately perceive the attitudes, beliefs and intentions of others. Particular difficulties might be expected in the processing of counterfactual information such as sarcasm or lies.
The present study included 50 schizophrenia or schizo-affective out-patients and 44 demographically comparable healthy adults who were administered Part III of The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT; a measure assessing comprehension of sarcasm versus lies) as well as measures of positive and negative symptoms and community functioning.
TASIT data were analyzed using a 2 (group: patients versus healthy adults) x 2 (condition: sarcasm versus lie) repeated-measures ANOVA. The results show significant effects for group, condition, and the group x condition interaction. Compared to controls, patients performed significantly worse on sarcasm but not lie scenes. Within-group contrasts showed that patients performed significantly worse on sarcasm versus lie scenes; controls performed comparably on both. In patients, performance on TASIT showed a significant correlation with positive, but not negative, symptoms. The group and interaction effects remained significant when rerun with a subset of patients with low-level positive symptoms. The findings for a relationship between TASIT performance and community functioning were essentially negative.
The findings replicate a prior demonstration of difficulty in the comprehension of sarcasm using a different test, but are not consistent with previous studies showing global ToM deficits in schizophrenia.
人际沟通问题在精神分裂症患者中很常见,并且可能部分与心理理论(ToM)缺陷有关,心理理论是准确感知他人态度、信念和意图的能力。在处理诸如讽刺或谎言等反事实信息时可能会出现特别的困难。
本研究纳入了50名精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍门诊患者以及44名在人口统计学上与之匹配的健康成年人,对他们进行了社会推理意识测试第三部分(TASIT;一种评估对讽刺与谎言理解能力的测试),以及阳性和阴性症状及社区功能的测量。
使用2(组:患者与健康成年人)×2(情境:讽刺与谎言)重复测量方差分析对TASIT数据进行分析。结果显示组、情境以及组×情境交互作用均有显著影响。与对照组相比,患者在讽刺情境下的表现明显更差,但在谎言情境下并非如此。组内对比显示,患者在讽刺情境下的表现显著差于谎言情境;对照组在两种情境下表现相当。在患者中,TASIT测试的表现与阳性症状而非阴性症状显著相关。当对低水平阳性症状的患者子集重新进行分析时,组和交互作用效应仍然显著。TASIT表现与社区功能之间关系的研究结果基本为阴性。
研究结果重复了先前使用不同测试所证明的讽刺理解困难,但与先前显示精神分裂症存在整体心理理论缺陷的研究不一致。