Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-1207, USA.
Cortex. 2012 Nov-Dec;48(10):1329-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
Comprehension of insincere communication is an important aspect of social cognition requiring visual perspective taking, emotion reading, and understanding others' thoughts, opinions, and intentions. Someone who is lying intends to hide their insincerity from the listener, while a sarcastic speaker wants the listener to recognize they are speaking insincerely. We investigated whether face-to-face testing of comprehending insincere communication would effectively discriminate among neurodegenerative disease patients with different patterns of real-life social deficits. We examined ability to comprehend lies and sarcasm from a third-person perspective, using contextual cues, in 102 patients with one of four neurodegenerative diseases (behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia [bvFTD], Alzheimer's disease [AD], progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP], and vascular cognitive impairment) and 77 healthy older adults (normal controls--NCs). Participants answered questions about videos depicting social interactions involving deceptive, sarcastic, or sincere speech using The Awareness of Social Inference Test. All subjects equally understood sincere remarks, but bvFTD patients displayed impaired comprehension of lies and sarcasm compared with NCs. In other groups, impairment was not disease-specific but was proportionate to general cognitive impairment. Analysis of the task components revealed that only bvFTD patients were impaired on perspective taking and emotion reading elements and that both bvFTD and PSP patients had impaired ability to represent others' opinions and intentions (i.e., theory of mind). Test performance correlated with informants' ratings of subjects' empathy, perspective taking and neuropsychiatric symptoms in everyday life. Comprehending insincere communication is complex and requires multiple cognitive and emotional processes vulnerable across neurodegenerative diseases. However, bvFTD patients show uniquely focal and severe impairments at every level of theory of mind and emotion reading, leading to an inability to identify obvious examples of deception and sarcasm. This is consistent with studies suggesting this disease targets a specific neural network necessary for perceiving social salience and predicting negative social outcomes.
理解不真诚的交流是社会认知的一个重要方面,需要进行视觉视角转换、情绪解读以及理解他人的想法、意见和意图。说谎者意图向听众隐瞒自己的不真诚,而讽刺的说话者则希望听众意识到他们在不真诚地说话。我们调查了面对面测试理解不真诚交流是否能够有效地区分具有不同现实社交缺陷模式的神经退行性疾病患者。我们使用上下文线索,从第三人称视角检查了 102 名患有四种神经退行性疾病(行为变异额颞叶痴呆 [bvFTD]、阿尔茨海默病 [AD]、进行性核上性麻痹 [PSP] 和血管性认知障碍)和 77 名健康老年人(正常对照组 [NC])中的患者理解谎言和讽刺的能力。参与者回答了关于涉及欺骗性、讽刺性或真诚言语的社交互动视频的问题,使用了社会推理意识测试。所有受试者都能理解真诚的言论,但 bvFTD 患者与 NC 相比,理解谎言和讽刺的能力受损。在其他组中,损伤不是疾病特异性的,而是与一般认知损伤成比例的。对任务成分的分析表明,只有 bvFTD 患者在视角转换和情绪解读元素方面存在损伤,而 bvFTD 和 PSP 患者则在代表他人意见和意图(即心理理论)的能力方面存在损伤。测试表现与知情人对受试者在日常生活中的同理心、视角转换和神经精神症状的评分相关。理解不真诚的交流是复杂的,需要多种认知和情感过程,这些过程在神经退行性疾病中都很脆弱。然而,bvFTD 患者在心理理论和情绪解读的每一个层面都表现出独特的、严重的损伤,导致他们无法识别明显的欺骗和讽刺例子。这与研究一致,表明这种疾病针对的是感知社交显著性和预测负面社交结果所需的特定神经网络。