McKibbin Trevor, Frei Christopher R, Greene Rebecca E, Kwan Peter, Simon Jody, Koeller Jim M
College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 930 Madison Suite 890, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.
Oncologist. 2008 Aug;13(8):876-85. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0061. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
The clinical trials on which the treatment of advanced colorectal (CRC) is based enroll few elderly patients. Furthermore, few investigations have determined the use and outcomes of the treatment of advanced CRC in practice. This study evaluated the treatment of advanced CRC in community oncology practices, focusing on age-related differences in treatment and outcome.
A national, retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the management of advanced CRC in 10 community practices across the U.S. All medical records of patients diagnosed with advanced CRC initiating chemotherapy treatment after January 1, 2003 through 2006 were included. The primary aim was to compare the proportion receiving doublet chemotherapy (irinotecan or oxaliplatin with a fluoropyrimidine) as initial therapy in young (age <or=65 years) and elderly (age >65 years) patients. Additional aims included age-based comparisons of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy, overall chemotherapy use, all-cause mortality, and toxicity-related events.
Overall, 520 patients (56% elderly) received 6,253 cycles of chemotherapy. Of the younger patients, 84% received doublet chemotherapy first-line, compared with 58% of elderly patients (p < .001). The use of each of the medications--irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab--was lower in elderly patients (p < .001). Independent predictors of a higher risk for mortality were age >65 (adjusted hazards ratio [HR],1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.39) and performance status score >or=2 (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.41-1.91).
Elderly patients are less likely to receive first-line doublet chemotherapy than younger patients. Age and performance status are independent predictors of treatment and overall survival.
晚期结直肠癌(CRC)治疗所依据的临床试验纳入的老年患者较少。此外,很少有研究确定晚期CRC治疗在实际应用中的使用情况和结果。本研究评估了社区肿瘤实践中晚期CRC的治疗情况,重点关注治疗和结果方面与年龄相关的差异。
进行了一项全国性的回顾性图表审查,以评估美国10个社区实践中晚期CRC的管理情况。纳入了2003年1月1日至2006年期间开始化疗治疗的所有诊断为晚期CRC患者的医疗记录。主要目的是比较年轻(年龄≤65岁)和老年(年龄>65岁)患者中接受双联化疗(伊立替康或奥沙利铂联合氟嘧啶)作为初始治疗的比例。其他目的包括基于年龄比较化疗联合贝伐单抗的使用情况、总体化疗使用情况、全因死亡率和毒性相关事件。
总体而言,520例患者(56%为老年患者)接受了6253个周期的化疗。年轻患者中,84%一线接受双联化疗,而老年患者为58%(p<.001)。老年患者中伊立替康、奥沙利铂和贝伐单抗每种药物的使用都较低(p<.001)。死亡风险较高的独立预测因素是年龄>65岁(调整后的风险比[HR],1.19;95%置信区间[CI],1.02 - 1.39)和体能状态评分≥2(HR,1.65;95%CI,1.41 - 1.91)。
老年患者比年轻患者接受一线双联化疗的可能性更小。年龄和体能状态是治疗和总生存的独立预测因素。