• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙语中100个人际动词的隐含因果关系规范研究。

Normative study of the implicit causality of 100 interpersonal verbs in Spanish.

作者信息

Goikoetxea Edurne, Pascual Gema, Acha Joana

机构信息

Departamento de Psicopedagogia, Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):760-72. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.760.

DOI:10.3758/brm.40.3.760
PMID:18697672
Abstract

This study provides normative data on the implicit causality of interpersonal verbs in Spanish. Two experiments were carried out. In Experiment 1, ratings of the implicit causality of 100 verbs classified into four types (agent-patient, agent-evocator, stimulus-experiencer, and experiencer-stimulus) were examined. An offline task was used in which 105 adults and 163 children had to complete sentences containing one verb. Both age and gender effects in the causal biases were examined. In Experiment 2, reading times for sentences containing 60 verbs were analyzed. An online reading task was used in which 34 adults had to read sentences that were both congruent and incongruent with the implicit causality of the verb. The results support the effect of implicit causality in both adults and children, and they support the taxonomy used.

摘要

本研究提供了西班牙语中人际动词隐含因果关系的规范数据。进行了两项实验。在实验1中,研究了100个分为四种类型(施事-受事、施事-引发者、刺激-体验者和体验者-刺激)的动词的隐含因果关系评级。使用了一项离线任务,其中105名成年人和163名儿童必须完成包含一个动词的句子。研究了因果偏差中的年龄和性别效应。在实验2中,分析了包含60个动词的句子的阅读时间。使用了一项在线阅读任务,其中34名成年人必须阅读与动词隐含因果关系一致和不一致的句子。结果支持了成年人和儿童中隐含因果关系的效应,并且支持所使用的分类法。

相似文献

1
Normative study of the implicit causality of 100 interpersonal verbs in Spanish.西班牙语中100个人际动词的隐含因果关系规范研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):760-72. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.760.
2
The production of referring expressions is influenced by the likelihood of next mention.指称语的产生受到下一次提及可能性的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Oct;76(10):2256-2284. doi: 10.1177/17470218231157268. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
3
Implicit causality biases and thematic roles in American Sign Language.美国手语中的隐含因果偏见和主题角色。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2172-2190. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01561-1. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
4
The influence of linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit causality.语言和认知因素对基于动词的隐含因果关系时间进程的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(3):455-81. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1055282. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
5
[Implicit causality in language: criteria for selection of stimulus material in studies of verb causality].[语言中的隐含因果关系:动词因果关系研究中刺激材料的选择标准]
Z Exp Psychol. 1997;44(2):293-304.
6
How long does it take to find a cause? An online investigation of implicit causality in sentence production.找到原因需要多长时间?句子生成中隐性因果关系的在线调查。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Sep;59(9):1535-55. doi: 10.1080/17470210500269105.
7
The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.句子理解中的主题层次结构:一项关于西班牙语中动词类别与词序相互作用的研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(10):1981-2007. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1000345. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
8
Sentence production in students with dyslexia.诵读困难学生的句子生成能力。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb;43(1):55-76. doi: 10.1080/13682820701284522.
9
Because there was a cause for concern: an investigation into a word-specific prediction account of the implicit-causality effect.因为存在一个值得关注的问题:对隐含因果效应的特定词汇预测账户的调查。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jan;63(1):3-15. doi: 10.1080/17470210903134344.
10
Implicit Causality and Pronoun Resolution in Intersubjective Discourse Relations.主体间话语关系中的隐性因果关系与代词指代消解
Front Psychol. 2022 May 10;13:866103. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866103. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Implicit causality biases and thematic roles in American Sign Language.美国手语中的隐含因果偏见和主题角色。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2172-2190. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01561-1. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
Pronoun interpretation in Mandarin Chinese follows principles of Bayesian inference.汉语代词解释遵循贝叶斯推理原则。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237012. eCollection 2020.
3
Prediction at the Discourse Level in Spanish-English Bilinguals: An Eye-Tracking Study.西班牙语-英语双语者语篇层面的预测:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 3;10:956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00956. eCollection 2019.
4
Immune to Situation: The Self-Serving Bias in Unambiguous Contexts.对情境免疫:明确情境下的自利偏差
Front Psychol. 2017 May 22;8:822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00822. eCollection 2017.
5
The Causes and Consequences Explicit in Verbs.动词中明确的原因和后果。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015;30(6):716-734. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1008524.
6
Misleading Bias-Driven Expectations in Referential Processing and the Facilitative Role of Contrastive Accent.指称加工中由误导性偏差驱动的预期以及对比重音的促进作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Oct;44(5):623-50. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9306-6.