Winther Rasmus Grønfeldt
Philosophy Department, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):11833-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711445105. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
Darwin's 19th century evolutionary theory of descent with modification through natural selection opened up a multidimensional and integrative conceptual space for biology. We explore three dimensions of this space: explanatory pattern, levels of selection, and degree of difference among units of the same type. Each dimension is defined by a respective pair of poles: law and narrative explanation, organismic and hierarchical selection, and variational and essentialist thinking. As a consequence of conceptual debates in the 20th century biological sciences, the poles of each pair came to be seen as mutually exclusive opposites. A significant amount of 21st century research focuses on systems (e.g., genomic, cellular, organismic, and ecological/global). Systemic Darwinism is emerging in this context. It follows a "compositional paradigm" according to which complex systems and their hierarchical networks of parts are the focus of biological investigation. Through the investigation of systems, Systemic Darwinism promises to reintegrate each dimension of Darwin's original logical space. Moreover, this ideally and potentially unified theory of biological ontology coordinates and integrates a plurality of mathematical biological theories (e.g., self-organization/structure, cladistics/history, and evolutionary genetics/function). Integrative Systemic Darwinism requires communal articulation from a plurality of perspectives. Although it is more general than these, it draws on previous advances in Systems Theory, Systems Biology, and Hierarchy Theory. Systemic Darwinism would greatly further bioengineering research and would provide a significantly deeper and more critical understanding of biological reality.
达尔文19世纪提出的通过自然选择进行有修改的进化理论,为生物学开辟了一个多维且综合的概念空间。我们探讨这个空间的三个维度:解释模式、选择层次以及同一类型单元之间的差异程度。每个维度都由各自的一对极点定义:定律解释与叙事解释、机体选择与层次选择、变分思维与本质主义思维。由于20世纪生物学领域的概念性争论,每一对极点逐渐被视为相互排斥的对立面。21世纪的大量研究聚焦于系统(如基因组、细胞、机体以及生态/全球系统)。在这种背景下,系统达尔文主义正在兴起。它遵循一种“构成范式”,根据该范式,复杂系统及其层次化的部分网络是生物学研究的重点。通过对系统的研究,系统达尔文主义有望重新整合达尔文原始逻辑空间的每个维度。此外,这种理想且潜在统一的生物本体论理论协调并整合了多种数学生物学理论(如自组织/结构、分支系统学/历史以及进化遗传学/功能)。综合系统达尔文主义需要从多个视角进行共同阐述。尽管它比这些理论更具一般性,但它借鉴了系统理论、系统生物学和层次理论先前取得的进展。系统达尔文主义将极大地推动生物工程研究,并能提供对生物现实更深入、更具批判性的理解。