Suppr超能文献

系统达尔文主义

Systemic darwinism.

作者信息

Winther Rasmus Grønfeldt

机构信息

Philosophy Department, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):11833-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711445105. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

Abstract

Darwin's 19th century evolutionary theory of descent with modification through natural selection opened up a multidimensional and integrative conceptual space for biology. We explore three dimensions of this space: explanatory pattern, levels of selection, and degree of difference among units of the same type. Each dimension is defined by a respective pair of poles: law and narrative explanation, organismic and hierarchical selection, and variational and essentialist thinking. As a consequence of conceptual debates in the 20th century biological sciences, the poles of each pair came to be seen as mutually exclusive opposites. A significant amount of 21st century research focuses on systems (e.g., genomic, cellular, organismic, and ecological/global). Systemic Darwinism is emerging in this context. It follows a "compositional paradigm" according to which complex systems and their hierarchical networks of parts are the focus of biological investigation. Through the investigation of systems, Systemic Darwinism promises to reintegrate each dimension of Darwin's original logical space. Moreover, this ideally and potentially unified theory of biological ontology coordinates and integrates a plurality of mathematical biological theories (e.g., self-organization/structure, cladistics/history, and evolutionary genetics/function). Integrative Systemic Darwinism requires communal articulation from a plurality of perspectives. Although it is more general than these, it draws on previous advances in Systems Theory, Systems Biology, and Hierarchy Theory. Systemic Darwinism would greatly further bioengineering research and would provide a significantly deeper and more critical understanding of biological reality.

摘要

达尔文19世纪提出的通过自然选择进行有修改的进化理论,为生物学开辟了一个多维且综合的概念空间。我们探讨这个空间的三个维度:解释模式、选择层次以及同一类型单元之间的差异程度。每个维度都由各自的一对极点定义:定律解释与叙事解释、机体选择与层次选择、变分思维与本质主义思维。由于20世纪生物学领域的概念性争论,每一对极点逐渐被视为相互排斥的对立面。21世纪的大量研究聚焦于系统(如基因组、细胞、机体以及生态/全球系统)。在这种背景下,系统达尔文主义正在兴起。它遵循一种“构成范式”,根据该范式,复杂系统及其层次化的部分网络是生物学研究的重点。通过对系统的研究,系统达尔文主义有望重新整合达尔文原始逻辑空间的每个维度。此外,这种理想且潜在统一的生物本体论理论协调并整合了多种数学生物学理论(如自组织/结构、分支系统学/历史以及进化遗传学/功能)。综合系统达尔文主义需要从多个视角进行共同阐述。尽管它比这些理论更具一般性,但它借鉴了系统理论、系统生物学和层次理论先前取得的进展。系统达尔文主义将极大地推动生物工程研究,并能提供对生物现实更深入、更具批判性的理解。

相似文献

1
Systemic darwinism.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):11833-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711445105. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
2
Darwin's politics of selection.
Politics Life Sci. 2019 May 1;38(1):72-102. doi: 10.1017/pls.2019.1.
3
Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory.
Science. 1982 Apr 23;216(4544):380-7. doi: 10.1126/science.7041256.
4
William Keith Brooks and the naturalist's defense of Darwinism in the late-nineteenth century.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2015 Jun;37(2):158-79. doi: 10.1007/s40656-015-0060-3. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
5
Social Darwinism: from reality to myth and from myth to reality.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011 Mar;42(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
6
Natural Selection and Pangenesis: The Darwinian Synthesis of Evolution and Genetics.
Adv Genet. 2018;102:121-142. doi: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
Neo-darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory: A modern perspective on Charlesworth, Lande, and Slatkin (1982).
Evolution. 2021 Jun;75(6):1244-1255. doi: 10.1111/evo.14268. Epub 2021 May 30.
9
Spirited dispute: the secret split between Wallace and Romanes.
Endeavour. 2008 Jun;32(2):75-8. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
10
Probabilistic causation and the explanatory role of natural selection.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011 Sep;42(3):344-55. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Ludwig von Bertalanffy's organismic view on the theory of evolution.
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2015 Mar;324(2):77-90. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.22611. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
2
Patterns of stochastic behavior in dynamically unstable high-dimensional biochemical networks.
Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2009 Jan 29;3:1-10. doi: 10.4137/grsb.s2078.

本文引用的文献

1
Transformation Series as an Ideographic Character Concept.
Cladistics. 2004 Feb;20(1):23-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00003.x.
3
PERSPECTIVE: A CRITIQUE OF SEWALL WRIGHT'S SHIFTING BALANCE THEORY OF EVOLUTION.
Evolution. 1997 Jun;51(3):643-671. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03650.x.
6
Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):8627-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611659104. Epub 2007 May 9.
7
Group selection and kin selection: two concepts but one process.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 17;104(16):6736-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700662104. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
8
Search for organising principles: understanding in systems biology.
Syst Biol (Stevenage). 2004 Jun;1(1):19-27. doi: 10.1049/sb:20045010.
9
Fundamental issues in systems biology.
Bioessays. 2005 Dec;27(12):1270-6. doi: 10.1002/bies.20323.
10
Fisherian and Wrightian perspectives in evolutionary genetics and model-mediated imposition of theoretical assumptions.
J Theor Biol. 2006 May 21;240(2):218-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.09.010. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验