Henan Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Biological Breeding, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, China; Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Adv Genet. 2018;102:121-142. doi: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
Since the end of the 19th century, Lamarck's name has been tightly linked to the notion of the inheritance of acquired characters. Darwin regarded Lamarck as a great zoologist and a forerunner of evolution, and repeatedly expressed the opinion that "natural selection has been the main but not the exclusive means of modification." The original Darwinism not only includes natural selection, but also the inheritance of acquired characters and mutation. Neo-Darwinism considers natural selection as the one controlling process of evolution, but denies the inheritance of acquired characters. Lysenkoism accepts the inheritance of acquired characters and graft hybridization, but denies the significance of Malthusism and Mutationism. It has been suggested that the "modern synthesis", which evolved from neo-Darwinism, needs a rethink. I propose that there is a need to go back to Darwin's own synthesis which combined his theory of evolution by natural selection with his theory of heredity and variation - Pangenesis.
自 19 世纪末以来,拉马克的名字一直与获得性特征的遗传概念紧密相连。达尔文将拉马克视为伟大的动物学家和进化论的先驱,并多次表示“自然选择一直是变异的主要手段,但不是唯一手段”。最初的达尔文主义不仅包括自然选择,还包括获得性特征的遗传和突变。新达尔文主义认为自然选择是进化的唯一控制过程,但否认获得性特征的遗传。李森科主义接受获得性特征的遗传和嫁接杂交,但否认马尔萨斯主义和突变主义的意义。有人认为,从新达尔文主义进化而来的“现代综合”需要重新思考。我认为有必要回到达尔文自己的综合,即将他的自然选择进化论与他的遗传和变异理论——泛生论结合起来。