Tol Wietse A, Komproe Ivan H, Susanty Dessy, Jordans Mark J D, Macy Robert D, De Jong Joop T V M
HealthNet TPO, Department of Public Health and Research, Tolstraat 127, 1074 VJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
JAMA. 2008 Aug 13;300(6):655-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.6.655.
Little is known about the efficacy of mental health interventions for children exposed to armed conflicts in low- and middle-income settings. Childhood mental health problems are difficult to address in situations of ongoing poverty and political instability.
To assess the efficacy of a school-based intervention designed for conflict-exposed children, implemented in a low-income setting.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cluster randomized trial involving 495 children (81.4% inclusion rate) who were a mean (SD) age of 9.9 (1.3) years, were attending randomly selected schools in political violence-affected communities in Poso, Indonesia, and were screened for exposure (> or = 1 events), posttraumatic stress disorder, and anxiety symptoms compared with a wait-listed control group. Nonblinded assessment took place before, 1 week after, and 6 months after treatment between March and December 2006.
Fifteen sessions, over 5 weeks, of a manualized, school-based group intervention, including trauma-processing activities, cooperative play, and creative-expressive elements, implemented by locally trained paraprofessionals.
We assessed psychiatric symptoms using the Child Posttraumatic Stress Scale, Depression Self-Rating Scale, the Self-Report for Anxiety Related Disorders 5-item version, and the Children's Hope Scale, and assessed function impairment as treatment outcomes using standardized symptom checklists and locally developed rating scales.
Correcting for clustering of participants within schools, we found significantly more improvement in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (mean change difference, 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 4.53) and maintained hope (mean change difference, -2.21; 95% CI, -3.52 to -0.91) in the treatment group than in the wait-listed group. Changes in traumatic idioms (stress-related physical symptoms) (mean change difference, 0.50; 95% CI, -0.12 to 1.11), depressive symptoms (mean change difference, 0.70; 95% CI, -0.08 to 1.49), anxiety (mean change difference, 0.12; 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.56), and functioning (mean change difference, 0.52; 95% CI, -0.43 to 1.46) were not different between the treatment and wait-listed groups.
In this study of children in violence-affected communities, a school-based intervention reduced posttraumatic stress symptoms and helped maintain hope, but did not reduce traumatic-stress related symptoms, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, or functional impairment.
isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN25172408.
在低收入和中等收入环境中,针对遭受武装冲突的儿童进行心理健康干预的效果鲜为人知。在持续贫困和政治不稳定的情况下,儿童心理健康问题难以解决。
评估在低收入环境中为遭受冲突影响的儿童设计的一项基于学校的干预措施的效果。
设计、地点和参与者:一项整群随机试验,涉及495名儿童(纳入率81.4%),他们的平均(标准差)年龄为9.9(1.3)岁,就读于印度尼西亚波索受政治暴力影响社区中随机选择的学校,并与一个等待名单对照组相比,筛查了暴露情况(≥1次事件)、创伤后应激障碍和焦虑症状。在2006年3月至12月期间,在治疗前、治疗后1周和6个月进行了非盲法评估。
在5周内进行15节基于手册的、以学校为基础的小组干预,包括创伤处理活动、合作游戏和创造性表达元素,由当地培训的辅助专业人员实施。
我们使用儿童创伤后应激量表、抑郁自评量表、焦虑相关障碍自我报告5项版本和儿童希望量表评估精神症状,并使用标准化症状清单和当地制定的评定量表评估功能损害作为治疗结局。
校正学校内参与者的聚类情况后,我们发现治疗组在创伤后应激障碍症状(平均变化差异,2.78;95%置信区间[CI],1.02至4.53)和维持希望(平均变化差异,-2.21;95%CI,-3.52至-0.91)方面的改善明显多于等待名单组。治疗组和等待名单组在创伤性习语(与压力相关的身体症状)(平均变化差异,0.50;95%CI,-0.12至1.11)、抑郁症状(平均变化差异,0.70;95%CI,-0.08至1.49)、焦虑(平均变化差异,0.12;95%CI,-0.31至0.56)和功能(平均变化差异,0.52;95%CI,-0.43至1.46)方面的变化没有差异。
在这项针对受暴力影响社区儿童的研究中,一项基于学校的干预措施减轻了创伤后应激症状并有助于维持希望,但没有减轻与创伤应激相关的症状、抑郁症状、焦虑症状或功能损害。
isrctn.org标识符:ISRCTN25172408。