Roedl Johannes B, Colen Rivka R, Holalkere Nagaraj S, Fischman Alan J, Choi Noah C, Blake Michael A
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. johannes@
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Dec;89(3):278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.014. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
We determined whether evaluation of treatment response is feasible by measuring metabolic tumor volume parameters on 18F-FDG (Fluorodeoxyglucose) PET-CT (Positron emission tomography-Computed tomography). We compared the response evaluation based on metabolic tumor volume parameters to a histopathologic and clinical response evaluation (clinical response criteria: RECIST criteria=Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, and WHO criteria=World health organization).
A total of 51 study subjects with adenocarcinomas (Type I due to Siewert classification) of the esophagus underwent PET-CT scans before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Tumor volume, maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV) were assessed before and after chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the total lesion glycolysis (TLG) was calculated by multiplying the tumor volume by the mean SUV of the volume. Clinical response evaluation was performed with endoscopic ultrasound and CT using RECIST and WHO criteria. The reference standard for treatment response was the postsurgical histopathology.
The decrease of tumor volume between the pre- and post-treatment PET-CT scans was a better predictor of histopathologic response and survival than the decrease of the SUV and of the clinical response evaluation based on RECIST and WHO criteria. The highest accuracy, however, was achieved when using the TLG for the identification of treatment responders. A decrease of the TLG by > 78% between pre- and post-therapy scans predicted histopathologic response with a sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 93%, respectively.
Tumor volume and TLG can be used to assess treatment response and survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.
我们通过测量18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)上的代谢肿瘤体积参数,确定评估治疗反应是否可行。我们将基于代谢肿瘤体积参数的反应评估与组织病理学和临床反应评估进行了比较(临床反应标准:实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST标准)和世界卫生组织(WHO)标准)。
共有51例食管腺癌(根据Siewert分类为I型)患者在新辅助放化疗前后接受了PET-CT扫描。在放化疗前后评估肿瘤体积、最大和平均标准化摄取值(SUV)。此外,通过将肿瘤体积乘以该体积的平均SUV来计算总病变糖酵解(TLG)。使用RECIST和WHO标准通过内镜超声和CT进行临床反应评估。治疗反应的参考标准是术后组织病理学。
与SUV的降低以及基于RECIST和WHO标准的临床反应评估相比,治疗前后PET-CT扫描之间肿瘤体积的减小是组织病理学反应和生存的更好预测指标。然而,使用TLG识别治疗反应者时准确性最高。治疗前后扫描之间TLG降低>78%可预测组织病理学反应,敏感性和特异性分别为91%和93%。
肿瘤体积和TLG可用于评估食管腺癌患者的治疗反应和生存情况。