Pickett Kate E, Wilkinson Richard G
Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
Ethn Health. 2008 Sep;13(4):321-34. doi: 10.1080/13557850701882928.
Studies examining the effects of neighbourhood characteristics have reported what has been called a 'group density' effect on health, such that members of low status minority communities living in an area with a higher proportion of their own racial or ethnic group tend to have better health than those who live in areas with a lower proportion. In this paper we survey published research on ethnic group density and health with the aim of stimulating further research. We situate the research question in the context of contemporary social epidemiology and provide a narrative review of studies of ethnic density and health. We go on to discuss processes which may underlie ethnic density effects, and highlight gaps in the literature and opportunities for further research. Although first recognised in studies of mental illness, 'group density' effects on physical health have been shown more recently. Generally, given individual material circumstances, living in a poorer area is associated with worse health. Members of ethnic minorities who live in areas where there are few like themselves are likely to be materially better off, and living in better neighbourhoods, than those who live in areas with a higher concentration. However, through the eyes of the majority community, they may be made more aware of belonging to a low status minority group, and the psychosocial effects of stigma may offset any advantage. If the psychological effects of stigma are sometimes powerful enough to override material advantage, this may have implications for our understanding of how low social status affects health more generally. As well as highlighting the importance of low social status, cultural isolation and social support to health and quality of life, this paper shows how an understanding of group density effects also has something to offer to our understanding of issues of prejudice, segregation, assimilation and integration in diverse societies.
研究邻里特征影响的相关研究报告了所谓的“群体密度”对健康的影响,即生活在本种族或民族群体比例较高地区的低地位少数族裔社区成员,往往比生活在该比例较低地区的成员健康状况更好。在本文中,我们调查了已发表的关于族群密度与健康的研究,旨在推动进一步的研究。我们将研究问题置于当代社会流行病学的背景下,并对族群密度与健康的研究进行叙述性综述。我们接着讨论可能构成族群密度效应基础的过程,并突出文献中的空白以及进一步研究的机会。虽然“群体密度”对心理健康的影响最早在相关研究中得到确认,但最近已证明其对身体健康也有影响。一般来说,在个体物质条件相同的情况下,生活在较贫困地区与较差的健康状况相关。生活在本族群人数较少地区的少数族裔成员,相较于生活在本族群集中度较高地区的成员,在物质上可能更为富足,且居住在更好的社区。然而,从多数群体社区的视角来看,他们可能更强烈地意识到自己属于低地位少数群体,而耻辱感带来的心理社会影响可能会抵消任何优势。如果耻辱感的心理影响有时强大到足以超越物质优势,这可能会影响我们对社会地位低下如何更广泛地影响健康的理解。除了强调社会地位低下、文化孤立和社会支持对健康及生活质量的重要性之外,本文还展示了对群体密度效应的理解如何有助于我们理解多元社会中的偏见、隔离、同化和融合等问题。