Belgers J D M, Aalderink G H, Van den Brink P J
Alterra, Wageningen University and Research centre, Department of Aquatic and Water Quality Management, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2009 Feb;72(2):579-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
We tested the sensitivity of nine submersed macrophyte species to the fungicides chlorothalonil, pentachlorophenol, fluazinam, and carbendazim. Endpoints determined 3 weeks after the start of the treatment were based on shoot and root growth in water. Carbendazim proved not or only moderately toxic to these macrophytes. Pentachlorophenol and chlorothalonil were more toxic than fluazinam. Taking all endpoints into consideration, toxicity levels differed very substantially. Although root endpoints reflecting root growth were in some cases more sensitive than shoot endpoints, shoot growth endpoints like relative growth turned out to be more reliable than the root growth endpoints. Due to the large differences in the type of mode of action between fungicides, it is very difficult to predict their potential effect in the environment or even to predict whether non-target organisms like macrophytes are likely to be sensitive. Ideally, therefore, the registration of fungicides requires an extensive risk-assessment procedure, which also covers non-target groups like macrophytes.
我们测试了9种沉水大型植物对杀菌剂百菌清、五氯苯酚、氟啶胺和多菌灵的敏感性。处理开始3周后确定的终点基于水中茎和根的生长情况。结果表明,多菌灵对这些大型植物无毒或毒性较低。五氯苯酚和百菌清的毒性比氟啶胺更强。综合所有终点来看,毒性水平差异非常大。尽管反映根生长的根终点在某些情况下比茎终点更敏感,但像相对生长这样的茎生长终点比根生长终点更可靠。由于杀菌剂之间作用方式类型差异很大,很难预测它们在环境中的潜在影响,甚至难以预测像大型植物这样的非靶标生物是否可能敏感。因此,理想情况下,杀菌剂的登记需要广泛的风险评估程序,该程序还应涵盖像大型植物这样的非靶标群体。