• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
When there's a heartbeat: miscarriage management in Catholic-owned hospitals.当有心跳时:天主教医院的流产管理
Am J Public Health. 2008 Oct;98(10):1774-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.126730. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
2
Referrals for Services Prohibited In Catholic Health Care Facilities.禁止向天主教医疗保健机构转介服务。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Sep;48(3):111-7. doi: 10.1363/48e10216. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns' experiences.天主教医院中的输卵管结扎术:一项关于妇产科医生经历的定性研究。
Contraception. 2014 Oct;90(4):422-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 4.
4
"Am I Going to Be in Trouble for What I'm Doing?": Providing Contraceptive Care in Religious Health Care Systems.“我这样做会有麻烦吗?”:宗教医疗保健系统提供避孕护理。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Dec;51(4):193-199. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12125. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
Anticipatory Counseling About Miscarriage Management in Catholic Hospitals: A Qualitative Exploration of Women's Preferences.天主教医院流产管理的预期咨询:对女性偏好的定性探索。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Sep;52(3):171-179. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12157.
6
Anencephaly and the interruption of pregnancy: policy proposals for HECs.无脑儿与妊娠中断:高等教育委员会的政策建议
HEC Forum. 1992;4(2):103-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00058013.
7
Integration of Catholic Values and Professional Obligations in the Provision of Family Planning Services: A Qualitative Study.天主教价值观与计划生育服务专业职责的整合:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2020297. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20297.
8
"My Hands Are Tied": Abortion Restrictions and Providers' Experiences in Religious and Nonreligious Health Care Systems.“束手无策”:宗教和非宗教医疗保健系统中的堕胎限制和提供者的经历。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;52(2):107-115. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12148. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
9
Religious freedom, reproductive health care, and hospital mergers.宗教自由、生殖健康护理与医院合并
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 1997 Spring;52(2):65-8.
10
Do religious restrictions influence ectopic pregnancy management? A national qualitative study.宗教限制是否影响异位妊娠的管理?一项全国性的定性研究。
Womens Health Issues. 2011 Mar-Apr;21(2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.11.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Personhood Begins at Birth: The Rational Foundation for Abortion Policy in a Secular State.人格始于出生:世俗国家堕胎政策的理性基础。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):751-769. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10352-0. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
Institutional Objection to Voluntary Assisted Dying in Victoria, Australia: An Analysis of Publicly Available Policies.澳大利亚维多利亚州对自愿协助死亡的制度性反对:对公开政策的分析。
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Sep;20(3):467-484. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10271-6. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Institutional objection to abortion: A mixed-methods narrative review.机构性反对堕胎:混合方法叙事性综述。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231152373. doi: 10.1177/17455057231152373.
4
Infectious Complications of Abortion.堕胎的感染并发症
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 23;9(11):ofac553. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac553. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Religious Accommodation in Bioethics and the Practice of Medicine.宗教在生物伦理学和医学实践中的调适
J Med Philos. 2021 Apr 2;46(2):188-218. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa038.
6
Ambiguities in Washington State hospital policies, irrespective of Catholic affiliation, regarding abortion and contraception service provision.华盛顿州医院政策中的模糊之处,无论是否与天主教有关联,都涉及到提供堕胎和避孕服务。
Reprod Health. 2018 Oct 19;15(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0621-5.
7
Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns' experiences.天主教医院中的输卵管结扎术:一项关于妇产科医生经历的定性研究。
Contraception. 2014 Oct;90(4):422-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 4.
8
Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies.妇产科医生、宗教机构与患者医疗政策相关的冲突。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):73.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.023. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
9
Religious hospitals and primary care physicians: conflicts over policies for patient care.宗教医院和初级保健医生:在患者护理政策上的冲突。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jul;25(7):725-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1329-6. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
10
Legal barriers to second-trimester abortion provision and public health consequences.孕中期堕胎的法律障碍及公共卫生后果。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99(4):623-30. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.127530. Epub 2009 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
A piece of my mind. A question of faith.我的一点想法。信仰问题。
JAMA. 2007 Apr 4;297(13):1412. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.13.1412.
2
Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices.宗教、良知与有争议的临床实践。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 8;356(6):593-600. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa065316.
3
Saving Roe is not enough: when religion controls healthcare.拯救罗诉韦德案是不够的:当宗教控制医疗保健时。
Fordham Urban Law J. 2004 Mar;31(3):725-49.
4
The celestial fire of conscience -- refusing to deliver medical care.良知的天火——拒绝提供医疗服务。 (此译文需结合上下文进一步理解其确切含义,从字面看表述比较奇特,不太符合常见语境)
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 16;352(24):2471-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058112.
5
The high cost of merging with a religiously-controlled hospital.与宗教控制的医院合并的高昂成本。
Berkeley Womens Law J. 2001;16:140-56.
6
Dimensions of informed consent to treatment.治疗知情同意的维度。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Jun;85(3):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.03.001.
7
Ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care services.天主教医疗服务的伦理与宗教指南。
Origins. 2001 Jul 19;31(9):153, 155-63.
8
A brief history. A summary of the development of the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.简史。《天主教医疗服务伦理与宗教指令》发展概述。
Health Prog. 2001 Nov-Dec;82(6):18-21.
9
The scope and limits of conscientious objection.良心拒服兵役的范围与限制。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000 Oct;71(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00330-1.
10
Holy owned. Is it fair for a Catholic hospital to impose its morals on patients?神圣的所有权。天主教医院将其道德观念强加于患者身上公平吗?
Time. 1999 Nov 15;154(20):85-6.

当有心跳时:天主教医院的流产管理

When there's a heartbeat: miscarriage management in Catholic-owned hospitals.

作者信息

Freedman Lori R, Landy Uta, Steinauer Jody

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UCSF Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, 1330 Broadway Street, Ste 1100, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2008 Oct;98(10):1774-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.126730. Epub 2008 Aug 13.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2007.126730
PMID:18703442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2636458/
Abstract

As Catholic-owned hospitals merge with or take over other facilities, they impose restrictions on reproductive health services, including abortion and contraceptive services. Our interviews with US obstetrician-gynecologists working in Catholic-owned hospitals revealed that they are also restricted in managing miscarriages. Catholic-owned hospital ethics committees denied approval of uterine evacuation while fetal heart tones were still present, forcing physicians to delay care or transport miscarrying patients to non-Catholic-owned facilities. Some physicians intentionally violated protocol because they felt patient safety was compromised. Although Catholic doctrine officially deems abortion permissible to preserve the life of the woman, Catholic-owned hospital ethics committees differ in their interpretation of how much health risk constitutes a threat to a woman's life and therefore how much risk must be present before they approve the intervention.

摘要

随着天主教医院与其他医疗机构合并或接管其他设施,它们对生殖健康服务施加了限制,包括堕胎和避孕服务。我们对在美国天主教医院工作的妇产科医生的访谈显示,他们在处理流产方面也受到限制。天主教医院的伦理委员会拒绝在胎儿心跳仍存在时批准子宫排空,迫使医生延迟治疗或将流产患者转运至非天主教医院。一些医生故意违反规定,因为他们觉得患者安全受到了威胁。尽管天主教教义官方认为为保护女性生命堕胎是允许的,但天主教医院的伦理委员会在对何种健康风险构成对女性生命的威胁以及因此在批准干预之前必须存在多大风险的解释上存在差异。