Suppr超能文献

宗教在生物伦理学和医学实践中的调适

Religious Accommodation in Bioethics and the Practice of Medicine.

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2021 Apr 2;46(2):188-218. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa038.

Abstract

Debates about the ethics of health care and medical research in contemporary pluralistic democracies often arise partly from competing religious and secular values. Such disagreements raise challenges of balancing claims of religious liberty with claims to equal treatment in health care. This paper proposes several mid-level principles to help in framing sound policies for resolving such disputes. We develop and illustrate these principles, exploring their application to conscientious objection by religious providers and religious institutions, accommodation of religious priorities in biomedical research, and treatment of patients' religious views in doctor-patient encounters. Given that no sound set of guiding principles yields precise solutions for every policy dispute, we explore how morally sound democracies might deliberatively resolve such policy issues, following our proposed principles. Taken together and carefully interpreted, these principles may help in guiding difficult decision making in the indefinitely large realm where government, medical providers, and patients encounter problems concerning religion and medicine.

摘要

当代多元化民主社会中有关医疗保健和医学研究的伦理问题的争论往往部分源于相互竞争的宗教和世俗价值观。这些分歧提出了在宗教自由主张和医疗保健平等待遇主张之间进行平衡的挑战。本文提出了几项中级原则,以帮助制定解决此类争议的合理政策。我们制定并说明了这些原则,探讨了它们在宗教提供者和宗教机构的基于良心的反对、在生物医学研究中对宗教优先事项的适应以及在医患接触中对待患者宗教观点方面的应用。鉴于没有一套完善的指导原则能够为每个政策争议提供精确的解决方案,我们探讨了在遵循我们提出的原则的情况下,道德健全的民主国家如何审慎地解决这些政策问题。这些原则综合起来并经过仔细解释,可以帮助指导在政府、医疗服务提供者和患者遇到涉及宗教和医学的问题的无限广泛的领域中进行艰难的决策。

相似文献

1
Religious Accommodation in Bioethics and the Practice of Medicine.
J Med Philos. 2021 Apr 2;46(2):188-218. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa038.
2
Conscientious refusal and health professionals: does religion make a difference?
Bioethics. 2014 Jan;28(1):8-15. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12059. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
4
Conscientious Objection: A Talmudic Paradigm Shift.
J Relig Health. 2020 Apr;59(2):639-650. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00979-4.
5
How special is medical conscience?
New Bioeth. 2019 Sep;25(3):207-220. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2019.1651078. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
6
The religious character of secular arguments supporting euthanasia and what it implies for conscientious practice in medicine.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Feb;44(1):57-74. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09602-2. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
7
No conscientious objection without normative justification: Against conscientious objection in medicine.
Bioethics. 2019 Jan;33(1):146-153. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12521. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
8
Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription.
J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):841-844. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104162. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
9
Conscientious objection in healthcare: How much discretionary space best supports good medicine?
Bioethics. 2019 Jan;33(1):154-161. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12477. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Religious pluralism and the ethics of healthcare.
Bioethics. 2023 Jan;37(1):42-51. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13113. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
2
Moral expertise without moral elitism.
Bioethics. 2023 Jul;37(6):564-574. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13034. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Rapprochement and Reform: Overcoming Factionalism in Policy Making for Serious Mental Illness.
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 May;73(5):539-546. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100450. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
"You Aren't Going to Cut On Me!" Urgent Medical Decisions for Patients With Schizophrenia.
Psychosomatics. 2018 Sep-Oct;59(5):506-511. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Saving Environmental Justice From Proceduralism.
Am J Bioeth. 2018 Mar;18(3):55-56. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1418933.
3
Legitimacy in bioethics: challenging the orthodoxy.
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jun;44(6):416-423. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104559. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Treatment of individuals who cannot receive blood products for religious or other reasons.
Am J Hematol. 2017 Dec;92(12):1370-1381. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24889. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Current controversies in brain death determination.
Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Aug;13(8):505-509. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.72. Epub 2017 May 26.
6
Physicians, Not Conscripts - Conscientious Objection in Health Care.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1380-1385. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1612472.
7
Providing Appropriate End-of-Life Care to Religious and Ethnic Minorities.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.08.024.
8
Conscientious Objection, Complicity in Wrongdoing, and a Not-So-Moderate Approach.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jan;26(1):109-119. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000682.
9
Tolerance, Professional Judgment, and the Discretionary Space of the Physician.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jan;26(1):18-31. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000621.
10
Doctors Have no Right to Refuse Medical Assistance in Dying, Abortion or Contraception.
Bioethics. 2017 Mar;31(3):162-170. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12288. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验