Noorddin Y, Raha A R, Jaafar M Z, Rozaidi S H W, Muraly S, Marlizan M Y
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaakob Latiff, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras Kuala Lumpur.
Med J Malaysia. 2007 Jun;62(2):127-9.
The use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as an alternative to the endotracheal tube (ETT) is becoming more popular in the practice of anesthesia. It is undeniable that this device has numerous advantages over endotracheal tube, however it does not provide an airtight seal between the airway and atmospheric gases. This may lead to pollution of the operating room environment with nitrous oxide. One hundreds adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia were divided into two groups. The airway in Group I was maintained with LMA with spontaneous ventilation and ETT with intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) was used for Group II. The result demonstrated that the ETT group recorded concentrations of nitrous oxide that were well above the NIOSH recommended eight hour time weighted average of 25ppm throughout the duration of surgery when compared to patients using LMA.
在麻醉实践中,使用喉罩气道(LMA)作为气管内插管(ETT)的替代方法正变得越来越普遍。不可否认,该装置相对于气管内插管有许多优点,然而它并不能在气道与大气气体之间提供气密密封。这可能导致手术室环境被一氧化二氮污染。一百名接受全身麻醉的成年患者被分为两组。第一组使用LMA维持气道并采用自主通气,第二组使用ETT并采用间歇正压通气(IPPV)。结果表明,与使用LMA的患者相比,ETT组在整个手术过程中记录的一氧化二氮浓度远高于美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)建议的8小时时间加权平均浓度25ppm。