Suppr超能文献

抗血小板治疗与抗凝治疗在颈动脉夹层中的应用:卒中研究中颈动脉夹层(CADISS)的理论依据与设计

Antiplatelet therapy vs. anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection: rationale and design of the Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS).

机构信息

Clinical Neuroscience, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London SW17 0RE, UK.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2007 Nov;2(4):292-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2007.00165.x.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Cervical artery dissection is an important cause of stroke in the young. It can present with local symptoms or stroke/transient ischaemic attacks. Following presentation there is a risk of stroke, particularly in the first month following presentation. The mechanism of stroke is believed to be thromboembolic in the majority of cases. Many clinicians anticoagulate patients with cervical dissection for 3-6 months. This is not evidence based and is supported by a paucity of data and no data from randomised control trials.

AIMS

CADISS is a prospective multicentre randomised-controlled trial in acute (within 7 days of onset) carotid and vertebral artery dissection. Intracerebral artery dissection is excluded.

DESIGN

Patients are randomised to antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, dipyridamole or clopidogrel alone or in dual combination) or anticoagulation therapy [heparin followed by warfarin aiming for an International Normalised Ratio (INR) in the range 2-3] for at least 3 months. Treatment is open-label.

STUDY OUTCOME

The primary end-point is ipsilateral stroke or death within 3 months from randomisation. Secondary end-points include any TIA or stroke, major bleeding and presence of residual stenosis at 3 months (>50%). All neuroimaging and serious adverse events will be adjudicated blinded to treatment. An initial feasibility phase of 250 subjects will allow us to determine whether *there are sufficient clinical end-points to provide the power to determine a treatment effect and *adequate numbers of patients can be recruited. The feasibility phase will be continued into a fully powered definitive treatment trial. Initial power calculations based on limited natural history data suggest a sample size of approximately 3000. Sample size calculations will be refined once the frequency of outcome events during the feasibility phase is known.

摘要

理论依据

颈内动脉夹层是年轻人中风的重要原因。它可表现为局部症状或中风/短暂性脑缺血发作。发病后存在中风风险,尤其是在发病后的第一个月。多数情况下,中风的机制被认为是血栓栓塞性的。许多临床医生对颈内动脉夹层患者进行3至6个月的抗凝治疗。这并非基于证据,且缺乏数据支持,也没有来自随机对照试验的数据。

目的

CADISS是一项针对急性(发病7天内)颈动脉和椎动脉夹层的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。排除颅内动脉夹层。

设计

患者被随机分为抗血小板治疗组(单独使用阿司匹林、双嘧达莫或氯吡格雷,或联合使用两种药物)或抗凝治疗组(先使用肝素,随后使用华法林,目标国际标准化比值[INR]在2至3之间),治疗至少3个月。治疗为开放标签。

研究结果

主要终点是随机分组后3个月内同侧中风或死亡。次要终点包括任何短暂性脑缺血发作或中风、大出血以及3个月时残余狭窄(>50%)的存在情况。所有神经影像学检查和严重不良事件将在对治疗不知情的情况下进行判定。250名受试者的初始可行性阶段将使我们能够确定是否有足够的临床终点来提供确定治疗效果的效力以及是否能够招募到足够数量的患者。可行性阶段将持续到一项充分有力的确定性治疗试验。基于有限的自然病史数据进行的初步效力计算表明样本量约为3000。一旦知道可行性阶段结局事件的发生频率,将对样本量计算进行完善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验