Massie Barry M, Krol William F, Ammon Susan E, Armstrong Paul W, Cleland John G, Collins Joseph F, Ezekowitz Michael, Jafri Syed M, O'Connor Christopher M, Packer Milton, Schulman Kevin A, Teo Koon, Warren Stuart
Cardiology Division, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CA 94121, USA.
J Card Fail. 2004 Apr;10(2):101-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2004.02.006.
The role of anticoagulation in patients with chronic heart failure has long been an area of interest and controversy. Traditionally the goal of anticoagulation has been to prevent embolic events, but recent trials also demonstrated that oral anticoagulation also prevents vascular events in patients with prior myocardial infarction, who constitute the majority of heart failure patients. Although antiplatelet agents also reduce postinfarction vascular events, few data are available in heart failure patients, and some evidence suggests that aspirin may also have the potential to worsen heart failure morbidity and mortality, possibly by interfering with the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Methods and results The Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) trial was undertaken to determine the optimal antithrombotic agent for heart failure patients. WATCH was a prospective-randomized trial in which symptomatic heart failure patients in sinus rhythm with ejection fractions < or =35% taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (unless not tolerated) and diuretics were randomized to open-label warfarin (target International Normalized Ratio 2.5-3.0) or double-blind antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 162 mg or clopidogrel 75 mg. Two primary comparisons were specified: anticoagulation with warfarin versus antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel versus antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. The primary outcome is the composite of death from all causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke analyzed as time to first event using the intent-to-treat approach. The secondary endpoint was the broader composite of death from all causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalizations for worsening heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, and systemic or pulmonary artery embolic events. Additional prespecified analyses include heart failure events, coronary events, and resource utilization.
Although the trial was designed to enter 4500 patients, it was terminated 18 months prematurely in June 2003 by the VA Cooperative Study Program because of poor enrollment with a resulting reduction of its power to achieve its original objective. This manuscript describes the study rationale, protocol design, and the baseline characteristics of the 1587 patients who were entered into the study. The WATCH trial will help define the optimal approach to antithrombotic therapy in the contemporary management of patients with chronic heart failure resulting from left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
抗凝治疗在慢性心力衰竭患者中的作用长期以来一直是一个备受关注且存在争议的领域。传统上,抗凝治疗的目标是预防栓塞事件,但近期试验还表明,口服抗凝药也可预防既往有心肌梗死患者(这类患者构成心力衰竭患者的大多数)发生血管事件。尽管抗血小板药物也能降低心肌梗死后的血管事件发生率,但针对心力衰竭患者的数据较少,而且有证据表明阿司匹林可能也有使心力衰竭发病率和死亡率恶化的潜在风险,这可能是通过干扰血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的作用实现的。
开展了慢性心力衰竭华法林与抗血小板治疗(WATCH)试验,以确定心力衰竭患者的最佳抗栓药物。WATCH是一项前瞻性随机试验,入选的是窦性心律、射血分数≤35%、正在服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(除非不耐受)和利尿剂的有症状心力衰竭患者,将其随机分为开放标签的华法林组(目标国际标准化比值为2.5 - 3.0)或双盲抗血小板治疗组,抗血小板治疗组使用162毫克阿司匹林或75毫克氯吡格雷。设定了两项主要比较:华法林抗凝治疗与阿司匹林抗血小板治疗,以及氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林抗血小板治疗。主要结局是全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和非致死性卒中的复合终点,采用意向性分析方法分析首次事件发生时间。次要终点是全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中和因心力衰竭恶化、不稳定型心绞痛以及全身性或肺动脉栓塞事件住院的更广泛复合终点。其他预先设定的分析包括心力衰竭事件、冠状动脉事件和资源利用情况。
尽管该试验计划纳入4500例患者,但由于入组情况不佳,导致其实现原定目标的效能降低,于2003年6月由美国退伍军人事务部合作研究项目提前18个月终止。本论文描述了研究原理、方案设计以及纳入研究的1587例患者的基线特征。WATCH试验将有助于确定在当代对左心室收缩功能障碍所致慢性心力衰竭患者进行抗栓治疗的最佳方法。