Ladics G S
DuPont Experimental Station, Building 353, Wilmington, DE 19880, USA.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Oct;46 Suppl 10:S20-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.07.021. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
A rigorous safety assessment process exists for GM crops. It includes evaluation of the introduced protein as well as the crop containing such protein with the goal of demonstrating the GM crop is "as-safe-as" non-transgenic crops in the food supply. One of the major issues for GM crops is the assessment of the expressed protein for allergenic potential. Currently, no single factor is recognized as an identifier for protein allergenicity. Therefore, a weight-of-evidence approach, which takes into account a variety of factors and approaches for an overall assessment of allergenic potential, is conducted [Codex Alimentarious Commission, 2003. Alinorm 03/34: Joint FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme, Codex Alimentarious Commission, Twenty-Fifth Session, Rome, Italy, 30 June-5 July, 2003. Appendix III, Guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods derived from recombinant-DNA plants, and Appendix IV, Annex on the assessment of possible allergenicity, pp. 47-60]. This assessment is based on what is known about allergens, including the history of exposure and safety of the gene(s) source; protein structure (e.g., amino acid sequence identity to human allergens); stability to pepsin digestion in vitro [Thomas, K. et al., 2004. A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 39, 87-98]; an estimate of exposure of the novel protein(s) to the gastrointestinal tract where absorption occurs (e.g., protein abundance in the crop, processing effects); and when appropriate, specific IgE binding studies or skin prick testing. Additional approaches may be considered (e.g., animal models; targeted sera screening) as the science evolves; however, such approaches have not been thoroughly evaluated or validated for predicting protein allergenicity.
对于转基因作物,存在严格的安全评估程序。该程序包括对导入蛋白质以及含有此类蛋白质的作物进行评估,目的是证明转基因作物在食品供应中与非转基因作物“同样安全”。转基因作物的主要问题之一是评估所表达蛋白质的潜在致敏性。目前,没有单一因素被公认为蛋白质致敏性的标识符。因此,采用了一种证据权重法,该方法考虑了多种因素和方法来全面评估潜在致敏性[食品法典委员会,2003年。ALINORM 03/34:粮农组织/世卫组织联合食品标准计划,食品法典委员会,第二十五届会议,意大利罗马,2003年6月30日至7月5日。附录三,重组DNA植物源性食品的食品安全评估指南,以及附录四,关于可能致敏性评估的附件,第47 - 60页]。该评估基于对过敏原的已知信息,包括基因来源的接触史和安全性;蛋白质结构(例如,与人类过敏原的氨基酸序列同一性);体外对胃蛋白酶消化的稳定性[托马斯,K.等人,2004年。用于评估新型蛋白质安全性的常见体外胃蛋白酶消化试验方案的多实验室评估。毒理学与药理学监管。39,87 - 98];对新型蛋白质在发生吸收的胃肠道中的暴露估计(例如,作物中蛋白质丰度、加工效果);以及在适当情况下,特异性IgE结合研究或皮肤点刺试验。随着科学的发展,可能会考虑其他方法(例如,动物模型;靶向血清筛查);然而,此类方法尚未经过全面评估或验证以预测蛋白质致敏性。