Maxwell Annette E, Danao Leda L, Crespi Catherine M, Antonio Cynthia, Garcia Gabriel M, Bastani Roshan
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research, School of Public Health/Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California,USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Aug;17(8):1963-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2800.
This report examines disparities associated with the type of colorectal screening test, fecal occult blood test versus endoscopy, within a particular racial/ethnic group, Filipino American immigrants.
Between July 2005 and October 2006, Filipino Americans aged 50 to 75 years from 31 community organizations in Los Angeles completed a 15-minute survey in English (65%) or Filipino (35%).
Of the 487 respondents included in this analysis, 257 (53%) had never received any type of colorectal cancer screening. Among the 230 subjects who had ever received a routine screening test, 78 had fecal occult blood test only (16% of the total sample), and 152 had endoscopy with or without fecal occult blood test (31% of the total sample). After controlling for access to care and key demographic variables in a multivariate analysis, only two characteristics distinguished between respondents who had fecal occult blood test only versus those who had endoscopy: acculturation, assessed by percent lifetime in the United States and language of interview, and income.
Our data suggest a two-tier system, fecal occult blood test for less acculturated Filipino Americans with lower income versus endoscopy for Filipino immigrants with higher levels of acculturation and income. The disparity persists after adjusting for access to care. Instead of treating minority groups as monolithic, differences within groups need to be examined so that interventions can be appropriately targeted.
本报告研究了在特定种族/族裔群体菲律宾裔美国移民中,与结直肠癌筛查测试类型(粪便潜血试验与内窥镜检查)相关的差异。
2005年7月至2006年10月期间,来自洛杉矶31个社区组织的50至75岁菲律宾裔美国人用英语(65%)或菲律宾语(35%)完成了一项15分钟的调查。
在本次分析纳入的487名受访者中,257人(53%)从未接受过任何类型的结直肠癌筛查。在230名曾接受过常规筛查测试的受试者中,78人仅进行了粪便潜血试验(占总样本的16%),152人进行了内窥镜检查,无论是否进行粪便潜血试验(占总样本的31%)。在多变量分析中控制了获得医疗服务的机会和关键人口统计学变量后,仅两个特征区分了仅进行粪便潜血试验的受访者与进行内窥镜检查的受访者:通过在美国生活的百分比和访谈语言评估的文化适应程度以及收入。
我们的数据表明存在一个两级系统,收入较低、文化适应程度较低的菲律宾裔美国人进行粪便潜血试验,而文化适应程度较高、收入较高的菲律宾移民进行内窥镜检查。在调整了获得医疗服务的机会后,这种差异仍然存在。不应将少数群体视为一个整体,而需要研究群体内部的差异,以便能够适当地确定干预目标。